人工老化后氧化锆结合强度耐久性:体外研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Athanasios E. Rigos , Katia Sarafidou , Eleana Kontonasaki
{"title":"人工老化后氧化锆结合强度耐久性:体外研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Athanasios E. Rigos ,&nbsp;Katia Sarafidou ,&nbsp;Eleana Kontonasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study systematically reviewed the literature regarding the bond strength durability of zirconia ceramics to resin-based luting cements after application of different bonding protocols and aging conditions. Electronic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were performed for relevant literature published between January 1st 2015 and November 15th 2022. Ninety-three (93) English language in-vitro studies were included. The percentage of the mean bond strength change was recorded prior to and after artificial aging, and the weighted mean values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Bonding protocols were classified based on the combination of MDP/non-MDP containing cement/primer and surface pretreatment, as well as the level of artificial aging performed. Alumina sandblasting (SA) was identified as the most frequently used surface pre-treatment while an insufficient number of studies was identified for each category of alternative surface treatments. The combination of MDP cement with tribochemical silica coating (TSC) or SA yielded more durable results after aging, while the application of SA and TSC improved bond durability when a non-MDP cement and a non-MDP primer were used. TSC may lead to increased bond durability compared to SA, whereas MDP cements may act similarly when combined with SA or TSC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51334,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Dental Science Review","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 138-159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/a7/main.PMC10238491.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zirconia bond strength durability following artificial aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies\",\"authors\":\"Athanasios E. Rigos ,&nbsp;Katia Sarafidou ,&nbsp;Eleana Kontonasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study systematically reviewed the literature regarding the bond strength durability of zirconia ceramics to resin-based luting cements after application of different bonding protocols and aging conditions. Electronic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were performed for relevant literature published between January 1st 2015 and November 15th 2022. Ninety-three (93) English language in-vitro studies were included. The percentage of the mean bond strength change was recorded prior to and after artificial aging, and the weighted mean values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Bonding protocols were classified based on the combination of MDP/non-MDP containing cement/primer and surface pretreatment, as well as the level of artificial aging performed. Alumina sandblasting (SA) was identified as the most frequently used surface pre-treatment while an insufficient number of studies was identified for each category of alternative surface treatments. The combination of MDP cement with tribochemical silica coating (TSC) or SA yielded more durable results after aging, while the application of SA and TSC improved bond durability when a non-MDP cement and a non-MDP primer were used. TSC may lead to increased bond durability compared to SA, whereas MDP cements may act similarly when combined with SA or TSC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Dental Science Review\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 138-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/a7/main.PMC10238491.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Dental Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761623000108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Dental Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761623000108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究系统地回顾了在应用不同的粘结方案和老化条件后,氧化锆陶瓷与树脂基粘结水泥的粘结强度耐久性的文献。在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中对2015年1月1日至2022年11月15日期间发表的相关文献进行了电子搜索。包括九十三(93)项英语体外研究。在人工老化前后记录平均粘结强度变化的百分比,并计算加权平均值和95%置信区间。根据MDP/不含MDP的水泥/底漆和表面预处理的组合,以及进行的人工老化水平,对粘合方案进行了分类。氧化铝喷砂(SA)被确定为最常用的表面预处理,而对每一类替代表面处理的研究数量不足。MDP水泥与摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层(TSC)或SA的组合在老化后产生了更持久的结果,而当使用非MDP水泥和非MDP底漆时,SA和TSC的应用提高了粘结耐久性。与SA相比,TSC可提高粘结耐久性,而MDP水泥与SA或TSC结合时可起类似作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Zirconia bond strength durability following artificial aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Zirconia bond strength durability following artificial aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Zirconia bond strength durability following artificial aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Zirconia bond strength durability following artificial aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

The present study systematically reviewed the literature regarding the bond strength durability of zirconia ceramics to resin-based luting cements after application of different bonding protocols and aging conditions. Electronic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were performed for relevant literature published between January 1st 2015 and November 15th 2022. Ninety-three (93) English language in-vitro studies were included. The percentage of the mean bond strength change was recorded prior to and after artificial aging, and the weighted mean values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Bonding protocols were classified based on the combination of MDP/non-MDP containing cement/primer and surface pretreatment, as well as the level of artificial aging performed. Alumina sandblasting (SA) was identified as the most frequently used surface pre-treatment while an insufficient number of studies was identified for each category of alternative surface treatments. The combination of MDP cement with tribochemical silica coating (TSC) or SA yielded more durable results after aging, while the application of SA and TSC improved bond durability when a non-MDP cement and a non-MDP primer were used. TSC may lead to increased bond durability compared to SA, whereas MDP cements may act similarly when combined with SA or TSC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Dental Science Review
Japanese Dental Science Review DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Japanese Dental Science Review is published by the Japanese Association for Dental Science aiming to introduce the modern aspects of the dental basic and clinical sciences in Japan, and to share and discuss the update information with foreign researchers and dentists for further development of dentistry. In principle, papers are written and submitted on the invitation of one of the Editors, although the Editors would be glad to receive suggestions. Proposals for review articles should be sent by the authors to one of the Editors by e-mail. All submitted papers are subject to the peer- refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信