Janis D. Harse , Ross J. Marriott , Kun Zhu , Kevin Murray , Romola S. Bucks
{"title":"社区居住成人维生素D状态和认知表现:观察性研究的剂量-反应荟萃分析","authors":"Janis D. Harse , Ross J. Marriott , Kun Zhu , Kevin Murray , Romola S. Bucks","doi":"10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Low vitamin D status is linked with poorer cognition in adults while findings in relation to high levels are mixed.<!--> <!-->We performed a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analyses to examine dose–response associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels<!--> <!-->and cognitive performance in community-dwelling adults. Thirty-eight observational studies were included in dose–response <em>meta</em>-analyses. Positive, nonlinear associations were identified between baseline<!--> <!-->25OHD levels and global cognition in<!--> <!-->cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, and for performance in memory and executive function in longitudinal analyses. When restricted to studies involving older adults, the<!--> <!-->pattern emerged for<!--> <!-->specific domains in cross-sectional analyses. Poorer performance was associated with low 25OHD levels, while a sharp improvement was associated with<!--> <!-->levels up to 60–70 nM/L. Further improvement was observed only for longitudinal global cognition. Our findings support the association between low vitamin D and poorer cognition and suggest levels of at least 60 nM/L are associated with better cognition during ageing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12469,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101080"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin D status and cognitive performance in community-dwelling adults: A dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies\",\"authors\":\"Janis D. Harse , Ross J. Marriott , Kun Zhu , Kevin Murray , Romola S. Bucks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Low vitamin D status is linked with poorer cognition in adults while findings in relation to high levels are mixed.<!--> <!-->We performed a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analyses to examine dose–response associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels<!--> <!-->and cognitive performance in community-dwelling adults. Thirty-eight observational studies were included in dose–response <em>meta</em>-analyses. Positive, nonlinear associations were identified between baseline<!--> <!-->25OHD levels and global cognition in<!--> <!-->cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, and for performance in memory and executive function in longitudinal analyses. When restricted to studies involving older adults, the<!--> <!-->pattern emerged for<!--> <!-->specific domains in cross-sectional analyses. Poorer performance was associated with low 25OHD levels, while a sharp improvement was associated with<!--> <!-->levels up to 60–70 nM/L. Further improvement was observed only for longitudinal global cognition. Our findings support the association between low vitamin D and poorer cognition and suggest levels of at least 60 nM/L are associated with better cognition during ageing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091302223000286\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091302223000286","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vitamin D status and cognitive performance in community-dwelling adults: A dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies
Low vitamin D status is linked with poorer cognition in adults while findings in relation to high levels are mixed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to examine dose–response associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels and cognitive performance in community-dwelling adults. Thirty-eight observational studies were included in dose–response meta-analyses. Positive, nonlinear associations were identified between baseline 25OHD levels and global cognition in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, and for performance in memory and executive function in longitudinal analyses. When restricted to studies involving older adults, the pattern emerged for specific domains in cross-sectional analyses. Poorer performance was associated with low 25OHD levels, while a sharp improvement was associated with levels up to 60–70 nM/L. Further improvement was observed only for longitudinal global cognition. Our findings support the association between low vitamin D and poorer cognition and suggest levels of at least 60 nM/L are associated with better cognition during ageing.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (FIN) publishes a wide range of informative articles including comprehensive reviews, systematic reviews, opinion pieces, and meta-analyses. While the majority of reviews are invited, we also embrace unsolicited reviews and meta-analyses, as well as proposals for thematic special issues, provided they meet our rigorous quality standards. In addition, we encourage authors to submit commentaries that concisely present fresh ideas or offer further analysis to delve deeper into the implications of an article published in our journal.