在年轻活跃的成年人中,低到中等强度血流受限的步行与不受限制的慢跑并不是急性等效物。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Thomas P Walden, Olivier Girard, Brendan R Scott, Andrew M Jonson, Jeremiah J Peiffer
{"title":"在年轻活跃的成年人中,低到中等强度血流受限的步行与不受限制的慢跑并不是急性等效物。","authors":"Thomas P Walden,&nbsp;Olivier Girard,&nbsp;Brendan R Scott,&nbsp;Andrew M Jonson,&nbsp;Jeremiah J Peiffer","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2107436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated whether walking with blood flow restriction (BFR) increases acute cardio-respiratory demands to the point that it can be considered an alternative for jogging. Sixteen physically active adults completed five experimental sessions (order randomised), comprising 10 min of treadmill exercise. Two sessions included unrestricted walking, two sessions required walking with BFR cuffs positioned on the lower limbs inflated to 60% of individualised arterial occlusion pressure, and one session was conducted at a jogging pace. Comfortable walking and jogging speeds were calculated during the familiarisation session. Walking speeds were individualised to either 100% (speed: 6.0 ± 0.3km·h-1[low-intensity]) or 120% (speed: 7.2 ± 0.3km·h-1[moderate-intensity]) of comfortable walking speed. The jogging session was unrestricted (speed: 9.1 ± 0.7km·h-1). Initial analysis compared walking conditions across heart rate, left cardiac work index, systolic blood pressure, relative oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, rating of perceived exertion and limb discomfort. Secondary analysis compared the walking session with the highest cardio-respiratory demands to jogging. Initial analysis identified that moderate-intensity with BFR induced the highest cardio-respiratory and perceptual responses compared with any other walking sessions (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Secondary analysis revealed that all cardio-respiratory measures were higher during jogging when compared with moderate-intensity with BFR (<i>p</i> < 0.01), except systolic blood pressure (<i>p</i> = 0.10). All perceptual measures were higher during moderate-intensity with BFR (<i>p</i> < 0.01) compared with jogging. Low- to moderate-intensity BFR-walking produces lower acute cardio-respiratory responses at higher ratings of perceived exertion and discomfort compared with jogging. Overall, BFR-walking does not seem to provide an equivalent exercise modality for unrestricted jogging in physically active adults.<b>Highlights</b>In young active adults, walking with blood flow restriction increases cardio-respiratory demands, yet not to a level equivalent to jogging.Moderate-intensity blood flow restricted walking elicits higher exercise-related sensation of exertion and leg discomfort than jogging.Blood flow restriction application increases exercise severity whereby moderate-intensity BFR-walking and jogging are both considered vigorous-intensity exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low- to moderate-intensity blood flow restricted walking is not an acute equivalent for unrestricted jogging in young active adults.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P Walden,&nbsp;Olivier Girard,&nbsp;Brendan R Scott,&nbsp;Andrew M Jonson,&nbsp;Jeremiah J Peiffer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17461391.2022.2107436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated whether walking with blood flow restriction (BFR) increases acute cardio-respiratory demands to the point that it can be considered an alternative for jogging. Sixteen physically active adults completed five experimental sessions (order randomised), comprising 10 min of treadmill exercise. Two sessions included unrestricted walking, two sessions required walking with BFR cuffs positioned on the lower limbs inflated to 60% of individualised arterial occlusion pressure, and one session was conducted at a jogging pace. Comfortable walking and jogging speeds were calculated during the familiarisation session. Walking speeds were individualised to either 100% (speed: 6.0 ± 0.3km·h-1[low-intensity]) or 120% (speed: 7.2 ± 0.3km·h-1[moderate-intensity]) of comfortable walking speed. The jogging session was unrestricted (speed: 9.1 ± 0.7km·h-1). Initial analysis compared walking conditions across heart rate, left cardiac work index, systolic blood pressure, relative oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, rating of perceived exertion and limb discomfort. Secondary analysis compared the walking session with the highest cardio-respiratory demands to jogging. Initial analysis identified that moderate-intensity with BFR induced the highest cardio-respiratory and perceptual responses compared with any other walking sessions (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Secondary analysis revealed that all cardio-respiratory measures were higher during jogging when compared with moderate-intensity with BFR (<i>p</i> < 0.01), except systolic blood pressure (<i>p</i> = 0.10). All perceptual measures were higher during moderate-intensity with BFR (<i>p</i> < 0.01) compared with jogging. Low- to moderate-intensity BFR-walking produces lower acute cardio-respiratory responses at higher ratings of perceived exertion and discomfort compared with jogging. Overall, BFR-walking does not seem to provide an equivalent exercise modality for unrestricted jogging in physically active adults.<b>Highlights</b>In young active adults, walking with blood flow restriction increases cardio-respiratory demands, yet not to a level equivalent to jogging.Moderate-intensity blood flow restricted walking elicits higher exercise-related sensation of exertion and leg discomfort than jogging.Blood flow restriction application increases exercise severity whereby moderate-intensity BFR-walking and jogging are both considered vigorous-intensity exercise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2022.2107436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2022.2107436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究调查了血流量限制步行(BFR)是否会增加急性心肺需求,以至于可以考虑将其视为慢跑的替代方案。16名身体活跃的成年人完成了5次实验(顺序随机),包括10分钟的跑步机锻炼。两个阶段包括不受限制的步行,两个阶段需要在下肢放置BFR袖口,膨胀到个例动脉闭塞压力的60%,一个阶段以慢跑速度进行。在熟悉阶段计算舒适步行和慢跑速度。将步行速度个性化到100%(速度:6.0±0.3km·h-1[低强度])或120%(速度:7.2±0.3km·h-1[中强度])的舒适步行速度。慢跑不受限制(速度:9.1±0.7km·h-1)。初步分析比较了不同步行条件下的心率、左心功指数、收缩压、相对耗氧量、分钟通气量、感知劳累等级和肢体不适。第二次分析比较了心肺需求最高的步行和慢跑。初步分析发现,与任何其他步行训练相比,中等强度的BFR可诱导最高的心肺和知觉反应(p p p = 0.10)。在中等强度的BFR中,所有知觉测量值都更高(p)。在年轻的活跃成年人中,限制血流的步行会增加心肺需求,但不会达到与慢跑相当的水平。与慢跑相比,中等强度的血流量限制步行会引起更高的运动相关的用力感和腿部不适感。血流限制应用会增加运动强度,因此中等强度的bfr -步行和慢跑都被认为是高强度运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low- to moderate-intensity blood flow restricted walking is not an acute equivalent for unrestricted jogging in young active adults.

This study investigated whether walking with blood flow restriction (BFR) increases acute cardio-respiratory demands to the point that it can be considered an alternative for jogging. Sixteen physically active adults completed five experimental sessions (order randomised), comprising 10 min of treadmill exercise. Two sessions included unrestricted walking, two sessions required walking with BFR cuffs positioned on the lower limbs inflated to 60% of individualised arterial occlusion pressure, and one session was conducted at a jogging pace. Comfortable walking and jogging speeds were calculated during the familiarisation session. Walking speeds were individualised to either 100% (speed: 6.0 ± 0.3km·h-1[low-intensity]) or 120% (speed: 7.2 ± 0.3km·h-1[moderate-intensity]) of comfortable walking speed. The jogging session was unrestricted (speed: 9.1 ± 0.7km·h-1). Initial analysis compared walking conditions across heart rate, left cardiac work index, systolic blood pressure, relative oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, rating of perceived exertion and limb discomfort. Secondary analysis compared the walking session with the highest cardio-respiratory demands to jogging. Initial analysis identified that moderate-intensity with BFR induced the highest cardio-respiratory and perceptual responses compared with any other walking sessions (p < 0.01). Secondary analysis revealed that all cardio-respiratory measures were higher during jogging when compared with moderate-intensity with BFR (p < 0.01), except systolic blood pressure (p = 0.10). All perceptual measures were higher during moderate-intensity with BFR (p < 0.01) compared with jogging. Low- to moderate-intensity BFR-walking produces lower acute cardio-respiratory responses at higher ratings of perceived exertion and discomfort compared with jogging. Overall, BFR-walking does not seem to provide an equivalent exercise modality for unrestricted jogging in physically active adults.HighlightsIn young active adults, walking with blood flow restriction increases cardio-respiratory demands, yet not to a level equivalent to jogging.Moderate-intensity blood flow restricted walking elicits higher exercise-related sensation of exertion and leg discomfort than jogging.Blood flow restriction application increases exercise severity whereby moderate-intensity BFR-walking and jogging are both considered vigorous-intensity exercise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信