单纯后腹膜镜供肾切除术学习曲线的累积和分析。

Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek, Ender Ozden, Murat Gulsen, Onur Kalayci, Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu, Yakup Bostanci, Saban Sarikaya
{"title":"单纯后腹膜镜供肾切除术学习曲线的累积和分析。","authors":"Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek, Ender Ozden, Murat Gulsen, Onur Kalayci, Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu, Yakup Bostanci, Saban Sarikaya","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and BINSEG method. The cohort was divided into three groups - group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11-48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E369-E373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek, Ender Ozden, Murat Gulsen, Onur Kalayci, Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu, Yakup Bostanci, Saban Sarikaya\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and BINSEG method. The cohort was divided into three groups - group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11-48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E369-E373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657224/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定纯后腹膜镜供体肾切除术(RDN)的精确学习曲线。方法:前瞻性收集和评估2010年1月至2019年7月期间接受纯RDN的172名连续肾供者的数据。采用累积和(CUSUM)分析法对手术时间进行检验。使用r程序和BINSEG方法确定变化点。该队列分为三组:第一组:胜任,包括前10例;第二组:熟练11-48例;第三组:后续124例为专家级。使用单因素方差分析评估连续变量,使用卡方检验评估分类数据。结果:39例(22.7%)供者进行了正确的RDN。第8例患者因腔静脉损伤转入开放手术,排除在CUSUM分析之外。根据纯RDN的经验,手术时间明显减少(p结论:在我们的研究中,在执行了50例纯RDN后观察到专业知识的获得。经腹膜技术是一种可行的替代方法,其应用范围远比纯RDN广泛。我们相信,了解与纯RDN相关的学习曲线可以促进采用这种方法作为经腹膜入路的可行替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysis.

Introduction: This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN).

Methods: Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and BINSEG method. The cohort was divided into three groups - group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11-48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test.

Results: Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable.

Conclusions: In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信