一种新颖的精神健康护理人员在线计划的可行性和可接受性。

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E Fitzgeraldson, Z Triandafilidis, Y Franklin, K Palazzi, F Kay-Lambkin, S Fitzpatrick
{"title":"一种新颖的精神健康护理人员在线计划的可行性和可接受性。","authors":"E Fitzgeraldson,&nbsp;Z Triandafilidis,&nbsp;Y Franklin,&nbsp;K Palazzi,&nbsp;F Kay-Lambkin,&nbsp;S Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a new online program (<i>Minds Together</i> ) for carers of a person with depressive or anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a two-arm randomised controlled trial design, 108 carers of a person with depressive or anxiety symptomology aged 16 years or over (89% female; mean age 50 years) received immediate or delayed access to the <i>Minds Together</i> program. Feasibility was measured using program activation and survey completion rates. Acceptability was measured using a project-specific satisfaction scale, semi-structured interviews, and program completion metadata. The study used intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis for participant-reported outcomes (carer burden, coping self-efficacy) across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility and acceptability thresholds were consistent with similar studies: 59% activated their program account, 47% met the program completion threshold, and almost all reported satisfaction with the program. The ITT indicated trends in increased coping self-efficacy and reduced carer burden for the Intervention group, compared to the Waitlist control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The <i>Minds Together</i> program is a feasible and acceptable program for carers supporting a person with depressive or anxiety symptomology. Results support exploration of the program's efficacy in a full-scale RCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/8e/2011-2084-ijpr-16-01-41.PMC10402641.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Online Program for Mental Health Carers.\",\"authors\":\"E Fitzgeraldson,&nbsp;Z Triandafilidis,&nbsp;Y Franklin,&nbsp;K Palazzi,&nbsp;F Kay-Lambkin,&nbsp;S Fitzpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.21500/20112084.5733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a new online program (<i>Minds Together</i> ) for carers of a person with depressive or anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a two-arm randomised controlled trial design, 108 carers of a person with depressive or anxiety symptomology aged 16 years or over (89% female; mean age 50 years) received immediate or delayed access to the <i>Minds Together</i> program. Feasibility was measured using program activation and survey completion rates. Acceptability was measured using a project-specific satisfaction scale, semi-structured interviews, and program completion metadata. The study used intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis for participant-reported outcomes (carer burden, coping self-efficacy) across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility and acceptability thresholds were consistent with similar studies: 59% activated their program account, 47% met the program completion threshold, and almost all reported satisfaction with the program. The ITT indicated trends in increased coping self-efficacy and reduced carer burden for the Intervention group, compared to the Waitlist control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The <i>Minds Together</i> program is a feasible and acceptable program for carers supporting a person with depressive or anxiety symptomology. Results support exploration of the program's efficacy in a full-scale RCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychological Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/8e/2011-2084-ijpr-16-01-41.PMC10402641.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5733\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评估一个新的在线项目(Minds Together)对抑郁或焦虑症状患者的护理人员的可行性和可接受性。方法:采用双臂随机对照试验设计,108名16岁及以上抑郁或焦虑症状患者的护理人员(89%为女性;平均年龄50岁)立即或延迟获得“心灵汇聚”计划的机会。可行性通过程序激活和调查完成率来衡量。可接受性是使用项目特定满意度量表、半结构化访谈和项目完成元数据来测量的。该研究使用意向治疗(ITT)分析参与者报告的结果(照顾者负担、应对自我效能)。结果:可行性和可接受性阈值与类似研究一致:59%的人激活了他们的计划账户,47%的人达到了计划完成阈值,几乎所有人都对计划表示满意。与候补名单组相比,ITT显示了干预组在应对自我效能和减轻照顾者负担方面的趋势。结论:对于护理人员支持抑郁或焦虑症状的患者而言,“心在一起”项目是一个可行且可接受的项目。结果支持在一项全面的随机对照试验中探索该方案的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Online Program for Mental Health Carers.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a new online program (Minds Together ) for carers of a person with depressive or anxiety symptoms.

Methods: Using a two-arm randomised controlled trial design, 108 carers of a person with depressive or anxiety symptomology aged 16 years or over (89% female; mean age 50 years) received immediate or delayed access to the Minds Together program. Feasibility was measured using program activation and survey completion rates. Acceptability was measured using a project-specific satisfaction scale, semi-structured interviews, and program completion metadata. The study used intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis for participant-reported outcomes (carer burden, coping self-efficacy) across groups.

Results: Feasibility and acceptability thresholds were consistent with similar studies: 59% activated their program account, 47% met the program completion threshold, and almost all reported satisfaction with the program. The ITT indicated trends in increased coping self-efficacy and reduced carer burden for the Intervention group, compared to the Waitlist control.

Conclusions: The Minds Together program is a feasible and acceptable program for carers supporting a person with depressive or anxiety symptomology. Results support exploration of the program's efficacy in a full-scale RCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信