低强度游泳限制血流量超过5周增加VO2peak:使用贝叶斯信息先验分布的随机对照试验。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Steffen Held, Ludwig Rappelt, Jan-Philip Deutsch, Robert Rein, Tim Wiedenmann, Anton Schiffer, Andreas Bieder, Ilka Staub, Lars Donath
{"title":"低强度游泳限制血流量超过5周增加VO2peak:使用贝叶斯信息先验分布的随机对照试验。","authors":"Steffen Held,&nbsp;Ludwig Rappelt,&nbsp;Jan-Philip Deutsch,&nbsp;Robert Rein,&nbsp;Tim Wiedenmann,&nbsp;Anton Schiffer,&nbsp;Andreas Bieder,&nbsp;Ilka Staub,&nbsp;Lars Donath","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2023.2180671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>peak) and speed at first (LT1, minimal lactate equivalent) and second lactate threshold (LT2 = LT1 +1.5 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>) are crucial swimming performance surrogates. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) during low-intensity swimming (LiT) on VO<sub>2</sub>peak, LT1, and LT2. Eighteen male swimmers (22.7 ±3.0 yrs; 69.9 ±8.5 kg; 1.8 ±0.1 m) were either assigned to the BFR or control (noBFR) group. While BFR was applied during LiT, noBFR completed the identical LIT without BFR application. BFR of the upper limb was applied via customized pneumatic cuffs (75% of occlusion pressure: 135 ±10 mmHg; 8 cm cuff width). BFR training took place three times a week over 5 weeks (accumulated weekly net BFR training: 60 min·week<sup>-1</sup>; occlusion per session: 2-times 10 min·session<sup>-1</sup>) and was used exclusively at low intensities. VO<sub>2</sub>peak, LT1, and LT2 diagnostics were employed. Bayesian credible intervals revealed notable VO<sub>2</sub>peak improvements by +0.29 L·min<sup>-1</sup> kg<sup>-1</sup> (95% credible interval: -0.26 to +0.85 L·min<sup>-1</sup> kg<sup>-1</sup>) when comparing BFR vs. noBFR. Speed at LT1 -0.01 m·s<sup>-1</sup> (-0.04 to +0.02 m·s<sup>-1</sup>) and LT2 -0.01 m·s<sup>-1</sup> (-0.03 to +0.02 m·s<sup>-1</sup>) did not change meaningfully when BFR was employed. Fifteen sessions of LIT swimming (macrocycle of 5 h over 5 weeks) with a weekly volume of 60 min with BFR application adds additional impact on VO<sub>2</sub>peak improvement compared to noBFR LIT swimming. Occasional BFR applications should be considered as a promising means to improve relevant performance surrogates in trained swimmers.<b>Highlights</b>Low-intensity swimming with blood flow restricted (BFR) induced superior peak oxygen consumption adaptations compared to non-restricted swimming training over a 5-week lasting training periodBFR and non-BFR swimming training-induced similar adaptations regarding swimming speed at first and second lactate thresholdIn conclusion, BFR served as a feasible, promising and beneficial complementary training stimuli to traditional swimming training regarding oxygen consumption adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-intensity swimming with blood flow restriction over 5 weeks increases VO<sub>2</sub>peak: A randomized controlled trial using Bayesian informative prior distribution.\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Held,&nbsp;Ludwig Rappelt,&nbsp;Jan-Philip Deutsch,&nbsp;Robert Rein,&nbsp;Tim Wiedenmann,&nbsp;Anton Schiffer,&nbsp;Andreas Bieder,&nbsp;Ilka Staub,&nbsp;Lars Donath\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17461391.2023.2180671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>peak) and speed at first (LT1, minimal lactate equivalent) and second lactate threshold (LT2 = LT1 +1.5 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>) are crucial swimming performance surrogates. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) during low-intensity swimming (LiT) on VO<sub>2</sub>peak, LT1, and LT2. Eighteen male swimmers (22.7 ±3.0 yrs; 69.9 ±8.5 kg; 1.8 ±0.1 m) were either assigned to the BFR or control (noBFR) group. While BFR was applied during LiT, noBFR completed the identical LIT without BFR application. BFR of the upper limb was applied via customized pneumatic cuffs (75% of occlusion pressure: 135 ±10 mmHg; 8 cm cuff width). BFR training took place three times a week over 5 weeks (accumulated weekly net BFR training: 60 min·week<sup>-1</sup>; occlusion per session: 2-times 10 min·session<sup>-1</sup>) and was used exclusively at low intensities. VO<sub>2</sub>peak, LT1, and LT2 diagnostics were employed. Bayesian credible intervals revealed notable VO<sub>2</sub>peak improvements by +0.29 L·min<sup>-1</sup> kg<sup>-1</sup> (95% credible interval: -0.26 to +0.85 L·min<sup>-1</sup> kg<sup>-1</sup>) when comparing BFR vs. noBFR. Speed at LT1 -0.01 m·s<sup>-1</sup> (-0.04 to +0.02 m·s<sup>-1</sup>) and LT2 -0.01 m·s<sup>-1</sup> (-0.03 to +0.02 m·s<sup>-1</sup>) did not change meaningfully when BFR was employed. Fifteen sessions of LIT swimming (macrocycle of 5 h over 5 weeks) with a weekly volume of 60 min with BFR application adds additional impact on VO<sub>2</sub>peak improvement compared to noBFR LIT swimming. Occasional BFR applications should be considered as a promising means to improve relevant performance surrogates in trained swimmers.<b>Highlights</b>Low-intensity swimming with blood flow restricted (BFR) induced superior peak oxygen consumption adaptations compared to non-restricted swimming training over a 5-week lasting training periodBFR and non-BFR swimming training-induced similar adaptations regarding swimming speed at first and second lactate thresholdIn conclusion, BFR served as a feasible, promising and beneficial complementary training stimuli to traditional swimming training regarding oxygen consumption adaptations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2023.2180671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2023.2180671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)和第一次速度(LT1,最低乳酸当量)和第二次乳酸阈值(LT2 = LT1 +1.5 mmol·L-1)是关键的游泳性能替代指标。本随机对照研究探讨了低强度游泳(LiT)时血流量限制(BFR)对vo2峰值、LT1和LT2的影响。男子游泳18人(22.7±3.0岁);69.9±8.5 kg;1.8±0.1 m)分为BFR组和对照组(无BFR组)。在LiT期间使用BFR,未使用BFR完成相同的LiT。上肢BFR通过定制的气动袖带施加(75%的闭塞压力:135±10 mmHg;8厘米袖宽)。5周内每周进行3次BFR训练(累计每周净BFR训练:60分钟·第1周;每次闭塞:2次,每次10分钟·每次-1次),只在低强度下使用。使用了VO2peak、LT1和LT2诊断。贝叶斯可信区间显示,当比较BFR和noBFR时,vo2峰值显著提高了+0.29 L·min-1 kg-1(95%可信区间:-0.26至+0.85 L·min-1 kg-1)。当采用BFR时,LT1 -0.01 m·s-1 (-0.04 ~ +0.02 m·s-1)和LT2 -0.01 m·s-1 (-0.03 ~ +0.02 m·s-1)速度无显著变化。与不使用BFR的LIT游泳相比,使用BFR进行15次LIT游泳(5周内5小时的大周期),每周60分钟的量增加了对vo2峰值改善的额外影响。偶尔应用BFR应该被认为是一种有希望的手段,以提高训练有素的游泳运动员的相关表现。在为期5周的持续训练期间,低强度血流量限制游泳(BFR)比无限制游泳训练诱导了更好的峰值耗氧量适应,dbfr和非BFR游泳训练在第一和第二乳酸阈值游泳速度方面诱导了相似的适应。综上所述,在耗氧量适应方面,BFR是传统游泳训练的一种可行、有希望和有益的补充训练刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-intensity swimming with blood flow restriction over 5 weeks increases VO2peak: A randomized controlled trial using Bayesian informative prior distribution.

Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and speed at first (LT1, minimal lactate equivalent) and second lactate threshold (LT2 = LT1 +1.5 mmol·L-1) are crucial swimming performance surrogates. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) during low-intensity swimming (LiT) on VO2peak, LT1, and LT2. Eighteen male swimmers (22.7 ±3.0 yrs; 69.9 ±8.5 kg; 1.8 ±0.1 m) were either assigned to the BFR or control (noBFR) group. While BFR was applied during LiT, noBFR completed the identical LIT without BFR application. BFR of the upper limb was applied via customized pneumatic cuffs (75% of occlusion pressure: 135 ±10 mmHg; 8 cm cuff width). BFR training took place three times a week over 5 weeks (accumulated weekly net BFR training: 60 min·week-1; occlusion per session: 2-times 10 min·session-1) and was used exclusively at low intensities. VO2peak, LT1, and LT2 diagnostics were employed. Bayesian credible intervals revealed notable VO2peak improvements by +0.29 L·min-1 kg-1 (95% credible interval: -0.26 to +0.85 L·min-1 kg-1) when comparing BFR vs. noBFR. Speed at LT1 -0.01 m·s-1 (-0.04 to +0.02 m·s-1) and LT2 -0.01 m·s-1 (-0.03 to +0.02 m·s-1) did not change meaningfully when BFR was employed. Fifteen sessions of LIT swimming (macrocycle of 5 h over 5 weeks) with a weekly volume of 60 min with BFR application adds additional impact on VO2peak improvement compared to noBFR LIT swimming. Occasional BFR applications should be considered as a promising means to improve relevant performance surrogates in trained swimmers.HighlightsLow-intensity swimming with blood flow restricted (BFR) induced superior peak oxygen consumption adaptations compared to non-restricted swimming training over a 5-week lasting training periodBFR and non-BFR swimming training-induced similar adaptations regarding swimming speed at first and second lactate thresholdIn conclusion, BFR served as a feasible, promising and beneficial complementary training stimuli to traditional swimming training regarding oxygen consumption adaptations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信