哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇和长效β2激动剂的依从性:一项MASK-air研究。

IF 10.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.07.004
B Sousa-Pinto, R Louis, J M Anto, R Amaral, A Sá-Sousa, W Czarlewski, L Brussino, G W Canonica, C Chaves Loureiro, A A Cruz, B Gemicioglu, T Haahtela, M Kupczyk, V Kvedariene, D E Larenas-Linnemann, Y Okamoto, M Ollert, O Pfaar, N Pham-Thi, F Puggioni, F S Regateiro, J Romantowski, J Sastre, N Scichilone, L Taborda-Barata, M T Ventura, I Agache, A Bedbrook, S Becker, K C Bergmann, S Bosnic-Anticevich, M Bonini, L-P Boulet, G Brusselle, R Buhl, L Cecchi, D Charpin, F de Blay, S Del Giacco, J C Ivancevich, M Jutel, L Klimek, H Kraxner, P Kuna, D Laune, M Makela, M Morais-Almeida, R Nadif, M Niedoszytko, N G Papadopoulos, A Papi, V Patella, B Pétré, D Rivero Yeverino, C Robalo Cordeiro, N Roche, P W Rouadi, B Samolinski, M Savouré, M H Shamji, A Sheikh, C Suppli Ulrik, O S Usmani, A Valiulis, A Yorgancioglu, T Zuberbier, J A Fonseca, E M Costa, J Bousquet
{"title":"哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇和长效β2激动剂的依从性:一项MASK-air研究。","authors":"B Sousa-Pinto, R Louis, J M Anto, R Amaral, A Sá-Sousa, W Czarlewski, L Brussino, G W Canonica, C Chaves Loureiro, A A Cruz, B Gemicioglu, T Haahtela, M Kupczyk, V Kvedariene, D E Larenas-Linnemann, Y Okamoto, M Ollert, O Pfaar, N Pham-Thi, F Puggioni, F S Regateiro, J Romantowski, J Sastre, N Scichilone, L Taborda-Barata, M T Ventura, I Agache, A Bedbrook, S Becker, K C Bergmann, S Bosnic-Anticevich, M Bonini, L-P Boulet, G Brusselle, R Buhl, L Cecchi, D Charpin, F de Blay, S Del Giacco, J C Ivancevich, M Jutel, L Klimek, H Kraxner, P Kuna, D Laune, M Makela, M Morais-Almeida, R Nadif, M Niedoszytko, N G Papadopoulos, A Papi, V Patella, B Pétré, D Rivero Yeverino, C Robalo Cordeiro, N Roche, P W Rouadi, B Samolinski, M Savouré, M H Shamji, A Sheikh, C Suppli Ulrik, O S Usmani, A Valiulis, A Yorgancioglu, T Zuberbier, J A Fonseca, E M Costa, J Bousquet","doi":"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to controller medication is a major problem in asthma management, being difficult to assess and tackle. mHealth apps can be used to assess adherence. We aimed to assess the adherence to inhaled corticosteroids+long-acting β2-agonists (ICS+LABA) in users of the MASK-air® app, comparing the adherence to ICS+formoterol (ICS+F) with that to ICS+other LABA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analysed complete weeks of MASK-air® data (2015-2022; 27 countries) from patients with self-reported asthma and ICS+LABA use. We compared patients reporting ICS+F versus ICS+other LABA on adherence levels, symptoms and symptom-medication scores. We built regression models to assess whether adherence to ICS+LABA was associated with asthma control or short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use. Sensitivity analyses were performed considering the weeks with no more than one missing day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2598 ICS+LABA users, 621 (23.9%) reported 4824 complete weeks and 866 (33.3%) reported weeks with at most one missing day. Higher adherence (use of medication ≥80% of weekly days) was observed for ICS+other LABA (75.1%) when compared to ICS+F (59.3%), despite both groups displaying similar asthma control and work productivity. The ICS+other LABA group was associated with more days of SABA use than the ICS+F group (median=71.4% versus 57.1% days). Each additional weekly day of ICS+F use was associated with a 4.1% less risk in weekly SABA use (95%CI=-6.5;-1.6%;<i>p</i>=0.001). For ICS+other LABA, the percentage was 8.2 (95%CI=-11.6;-5.0%;<i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In asthma patients adherent to the MASK-air app, adherence to ICS+LABA was high. ICS+F users reported lower adherence but also a lower SABA use and a similar level of control.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"2416869"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists in asthma: A MASK-air study.\",\"authors\":\"B Sousa-Pinto, R Louis, J M Anto, R Amaral, A Sá-Sousa, W Czarlewski, L Brussino, G W Canonica, C Chaves Loureiro, A A Cruz, B Gemicioglu, T Haahtela, M Kupczyk, V Kvedariene, D E Larenas-Linnemann, Y Okamoto, M Ollert, O Pfaar, N Pham-Thi, F Puggioni, F S Regateiro, J Romantowski, J Sastre, N Scichilone, L Taborda-Barata, M T Ventura, I Agache, A Bedbrook, S Becker, K C Bergmann, S Bosnic-Anticevich, M Bonini, L-P Boulet, G Brusselle, R Buhl, L Cecchi, D Charpin, F de Blay, S Del Giacco, J C Ivancevich, M Jutel, L Klimek, H Kraxner, P Kuna, D Laune, M Makela, M Morais-Almeida, R Nadif, M Niedoszytko, N G Papadopoulos, A Papi, V Patella, B Pétré, D Rivero Yeverino, C Robalo Cordeiro, N Roche, P W Rouadi, B Samolinski, M Savouré, M H Shamji, A Sheikh, C Suppli Ulrik, O S Usmani, A Valiulis, A Yorgancioglu, T Zuberbier, J A Fonseca, E M Costa, J Bousquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adherence to controller medication is a major problem in asthma management, being difficult to assess and tackle. mHealth apps can be used to assess adherence. We aimed to assess the adherence to inhaled corticosteroids+long-acting β2-agonists (ICS+LABA) in users of the MASK-air® app, comparing the adherence to ICS+formoterol (ICS+F) with that to ICS+other LABA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analysed complete weeks of MASK-air® data (2015-2022; 27 countries) from patients with self-reported asthma and ICS+LABA use. We compared patients reporting ICS+F versus ICS+other LABA on adherence levels, symptoms and symptom-medication scores. We built regression models to assess whether adherence to ICS+LABA was associated with asthma control or short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use. Sensitivity analyses were performed considering the weeks with no more than one missing day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2598 ICS+LABA users, 621 (23.9%) reported 4824 complete weeks and 866 (33.3%) reported weeks with at most one missing day. Higher adherence (use of medication ≥80% of weekly days) was observed for ICS+other LABA (75.1%) when compared to ICS+F (59.3%), despite both groups displaying similar asthma control and work productivity. The ICS+other LABA group was associated with more days of SABA use than the ICS+F group (median=71.4% versus 57.1% days). Each additional weekly day of ICS+F use was associated with a 4.1% less risk in weekly SABA use (95%CI=-6.5;-1.6%;<i>p</i>=0.001). For ICS+other LABA, the percentage was 8.2 (95%CI=-11.6;-5.0%;<i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In asthma patients adherent to the MASK-air app, adherence to ICS+LABA was high. ICS+F users reported lower adherence but also a lower SABA use and a similar level of control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2416869\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.07.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:依从性控制药物是哮喘管理的一个主要问题,很难评估和解决。移动健康应用程序可以用来评估依从性。我们旨在评估MASK-air®应用程序用户对吸入皮质类固醇+长效β2激动剂(ICS+LABA)的依从性,比较ICS+福莫特罗(ICS+F)与ICS+其他LABA的依从性。材料和方法:我们分析了完整周的MASK-air®数据(2015-2022;27个国家)患者自我报告的哮喘和ICS+LABA使用。我们比较了报告ICS+F和ICS+其他LABA的患者在依从性水平、症状和症状药物评分方面的差异。我们建立了回归模型来评估ICS+LABA依从性是否与哮喘控制或短效β受体激动剂(SABA)的使用相关。考虑失踪天数不超过一天的周数,进行敏感性分析。结果:在2598例ICS+LABA使用者中,621例(23.9%)报告了4824个完整周,866例(33.3%)报告了最多缺失一天的周。与ICS+F组(59.3%)相比,ICS+其他LABA组(75.1%)的依从性更高(每周用药≥80%),尽管两组的哮喘控制和工作效率相似。ICS+其他LABA组比ICS+F组使用SABA的天数更长(中位数=71.4%对57.1%)。ICS+F每周多使用一天,每周SABA使用风险降低4.1% (95%CI=-6.5;-1.6%;p=0.001)。对于ICS+其他LABA,百分比为8.2% (95%CI=-11.6;-5.0%)。结论:在坚持使用MASK-air应用程序的哮喘患者中,ICS+LABA的依从性较高。ICS+F使用者报告的依从性较低,但SABA的使用也较低,控制水平相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists in asthma: A MASK-air study.

Introduction: Adherence to controller medication is a major problem in asthma management, being difficult to assess and tackle. mHealth apps can be used to assess adherence. We aimed to assess the adherence to inhaled corticosteroids+long-acting β2-agonists (ICS+LABA) in users of the MASK-air® app, comparing the adherence to ICS+formoterol (ICS+F) with that to ICS+other LABA.

Materials and methods: We analysed complete weeks of MASK-air® data (2015-2022; 27 countries) from patients with self-reported asthma and ICS+LABA use. We compared patients reporting ICS+F versus ICS+other LABA on adherence levels, symptoms and symptom-medication scores. We built regression models to assess whether adherence to ICS+LABA was associated with asthma control or short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use. Sensitivity analyses were performed considering the weeks with no more than one missing day.

Results: In 2598 ICS+LABA users, 621 (23.9%) reported 4824 complete weeks and 866 (33.3%) reported weeks with at most one missing day. Higher adherence (use of medication ≥80% of weekly days) was observed for ICS+other LABA (75.1%) when compared to ICS+F (59.3%), despite both groups displaying similar asthma control and work productivity. The ICS+other LABA group was associated with more days of SABA use than the ICS+F group (median=71.4% versus 57.1% days). Each additional weekly day of ICS+F use was associated with a 4.1% less risk in weekly SABA use (95%CI=-6.5;-1.6%;p=0.001). For ICS+other LABA, the percentage was 8.2 (95%CI=-11.6;-5.0%;p<0.001).

Conclusions: In asthma patients adherent to the MASK-air app, adherence to ICS+LABA was high. ICS+F users reported lower adherence but also a lower SABA use and a similar level of control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信