甲基化相关基因在肾间质纤维化诊断和亚型分型中的意义。

IF 2.7 3区 生物学
Hanchao Zhang, Yue Yang, Zhengdao Liu, Hong Xu, Han Zhu, Peirui Wang, Guobiao Liang
{"title":"甲基化相关基因在肾间质纤维化诊断和亚型分型中的意义。","authors":"Hanchao Zhang,&nbsp;Yue Yang,&nbsp;Zhengdao Liu,&nbsp;Hong Xu,&nbsp;Han Zhu,&nbsp;Peirui Wang,&nbsp;Guobiao Liang","doi":"10.1186/s41065-023-00295-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>RNA methylation modifications, such as N1-methyladenosine/N6-methyladenosine /N5-methylcytosine (m<sup>1</sup>A/m<sup>6</sup>A/m<sup>5</sup>C), are the most common RNA modifications and are crucial for a number of biological processes. Nonetheless, the role of RNA methylation modifications of m<sup>1</sup>A/m<sup>6</sup>A/m<sup>5</sup>C in the pathogenesis of renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) remains incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firstly, we downloaded 2 expression datasets from the GEO database, namely GSE22459 and GSE76882. In a differential analysis of these datasets between patients with and without RIF, we selected 33 methylation-related genes (MRGs). We then applied a PPI network, LASSO analysis, SVM-RFE algorithm, and RF algorithm to identify key MRGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We eventually obtained five candidate MRGs (WTAP, ALKBH5, YTHDF2, RBMX, and ELAVL1) to forecast the risk of RIF. We created a nomogram model derived from five key MRGs, which revealed that the nomogram model may be advantageous to patients. Based on the selected five significant MRGs, patients with RIF were classified into two MRG patterns using consensus clustering, and the correlation between the five MRGs, the two MRG patterns, and the genetic pattern with immune cell infiltration was shown. Moreover, we conducted GO and KEGG analyses on 768 DEGs between MRG clusters A and B to look into their different involvement in RIF. To measure the MRG patterns, a PCA algorithm was developed to determine MRG scores for each sample. The MRG scores of the patients in cluster B were higher than those in cluster A.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultimately, we concluded that cluster A in the two MRG patterns identified on these five key m<sup>1</sup>A/m<sup>6</sup>A/m<sup>5</sup>C regulators may be associated with RIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12862,"journal":{"name":"Hereditas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of methylation-related genes in diagnosis and subtype classification of renal interstitial fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Hanchao Zhang,&nbsp;Yue Yang,&nbsp;Zhengdao Liu,&nbsp;Hong Xu,&nbsp;Han Zhu,&nbsp;Peirui Wang,&nbsp;Guobiao Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41065-023-00295-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>RNA methylation modifications, such as N1-methyladenosine/N6-methyladenosine /N5-methylcytosine (m<sup>1</sup>A/m<sup>6</sup>A/m<sup>5</sup>C), are the most common RNA modifications and are crucial for a number of biological processes. Nonetheless, the role of RNA methylation modifications of m<sup>1</sup>A/m<sup>6</sup>A/m<sup>5</sup>C in the pathogenesis of renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) remains incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firstly, we downloaded 2 expression datasets from the GEO database, namely GSE22459 and GSE76882. In a differential analysis of these datasets between patients with and without RIF, we selected 33 methylation-related genes (MRGs). We then applied a PPI network, LASSO analysis, SVM-RFE algorithm, and RF algorithm to identify key MRGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We eventually obtained five candidate MRGs (WTAP, ALKBH5, YTHDF2, RBMX, and ELAVL1) to forecast the risk of RIF. We created a nomogram model derived from five key MRGs, which revealed that the nomogram model may be advantageous to patients. Based on the selected five significant MRGs, patients with RIF were classified into two MRG patterns using consensus clustering, and the correlation between the five MRGs, the two MRG patterns, and the genetic pattern with immune cell infiltration was shown. Moreover, we conducted GO and KEGG analyses on 768 DEGs between MRG clusters A and B to look into their different involvement in RIF. To measure the MRG patterns, a PCA algorithm was developed to determine MRG scores for each sample. The MRG scores of the patients in cluster B were higher than those in cluster A.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultimately, we concluded that cluster A in the two MRG patterns identified on these five key m<sup>1</sup>A/m<sup>6</sup>A/m<sup>5</sup>C regulators may be associated with RIF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hereditas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373342/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hereditas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-023-00295-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditas","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-023-00295-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:RNA甲基化修饰,如n1 -甲基腺苷/ n6 -甲基腺苷/ n5 -甲基胞嘧啶(m1A/m6A/m5C),是最常见的RNA修饰,对许多生物过程至关重要。尽管如此,m1A/m6A/m5C的RNA甲基化修饰在肾间质纤维化(RIF)发病机制中的作用仍不完全清楚。方法:首先从GEO数据库中下载2个表达数据集GSE22459和GSE76882。在有和没有RIF的患者之间的数据集的差异分析中,我们选择了33个甲基化相关基因(mrg)。然后,我们应用PPI网络、LASSO分析、SVM-RFE算法和RF算法来识别关键的mrg。结果:我们最终获得了5个候选MRGs (WTAP、ALKBH5、YTHDF2、RBMX和ELAVL1)来预测RIF的风险。我们从五个关键的核磁共振图中创建了一个nomogram模型,这表明nomogram模型可能对患者有利。根据选取的5个显著MRG,采用共识聚类法将RIF患者分为2种MRG模式,并显示5种MRG、2种MRG模式和遗传模式与免疫细胞浸润的相关性。此外,我们对MRG集群A和B之间的768个deg进行了GO和KEGG分析,以了解它们对RIF的不同参与。为了测量MRG模式,开发了一个PCA算法来确定每个样本的MRG分数。B组患者的MRG评分高于A组患者。结论:最终,我们得出结论,在这五个关键的m1A/m6A/m5C调节因子上鉴定的两种MRG模式中的A组可能与RIF有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Significance of methylation-related genes in diagnosis and subtype classification of renal interstitial fibrosis.

Significance of methylation-related genes in diagnosis and subtype classification of renal interstitial fibrosis.

Significance of methylation-related genes in diagnosis and subtype classification of renal interstitial fibrosis.

Significance of methylation-related genes in diagnosis and subtype classification of renal interstitial fibrosis.

Background: RNA methylation modifications, such as N1-methyladenosine/N6-methyladenosine /N5-methylcytosine (m1A/m6A/m5C), are the most common RNA modifications and are crucial for a number of biological processes. Nonetheless, the role of RNA methylation modifications of m1A/m6A/m5C in the pathogenesis of renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) remains incompletely understood.

Methods: Firstly, we downloaded 2 expression datasets from the GEO database, namely GSE22459 and GSE76882. In a differential analysis of these datasets between patients with and without RIF, we selected 33 methylation-related genes (MRGs). We then applied a PPI network, LASSO analysis, SVM-RFE algorithm, and RF algorithm to identify key MRGs.

Results: We eventually obtained five candidate MRGs (WTAP, ALKBH5, YTHDF2, RBMX, and ELAVL1) to forecast the risk of RIF. We created a nomogram model derived from five key MRGs, which revealed that the nomogram model may be advantageous to patients. Based on the selected five significant MRGs, patients with RIF were classified into two MRG patterns using consensus clustering, and the correlation between the five MRGs, the two MRG patterns, and the genetic pattern with immune cell infiltration was shown. Moreover, we conducted GO and KEGG analyses on 768 DEGs between MRG clusters A and B to look into their different involvement in RIF. To measure the MRG patterns, a PCA algorithm was developed to determine MRG scores for each sample. The MRG scores of the patients in cluster B were higher than those in cluster A.

Conclusions: Ultimately, we concluded that cluster A in the two MRG patterns identified on these five key m1A/m6A/m5C regulators may be associated with RIF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hereditas
Hereditas Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For almost a century, Hereditas has published original cutting-edge research and reviews. As the Official journal of the Mendelian Society of Lund, the journal welcomes research from across all areas of genetics and genomics. Topics of interest include human and medical genetics, animal and plant genetics, microbial genetics, agriculture and bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信