纠正:测量流产的红心方法:在七种情况下实施标准化的比较分析方法。

IF 3.2 2区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Population Health Metrics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1186/s12963-023-00311-z

Onikepe O Owolabi, Margaret Giorgio, Ellie Leong, Elizabeth Sully

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Correction: The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Correction: The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

29 weeks

期刊介绍： Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.