细针穿刺细胞学对经中心针活检证实的转移淋巴结术前化疗后前哨淋巴结活检的临床影响。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529721
Rikiya Nakamura, Shouko Hayama, Satoshi Yoshimura, Makiko Itami, Akinobu Araki, Akiko Odaka, Naohito Yamamoto
{"title":"细针穿刺细胞学对经中心针活检证实的转移淋巴结术前化疗后前哨淋巴结活检的临床影响。","authors":"Rikiya Nakamura, Shouko Hayama, Satoshi Yoshimura, Makiko Itami, Akinobu Araki, Akiko Odaka, Naohito Yamamoto","doi":"10.1159/000529721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been increasingly performed for patients with lymph node (LN)-positive (cN1) breast cancer that converted to LN-negative (ycN0) status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aimed to clarify the SNB avoidance rates using fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for metastatic LNs after NAC. Methods: This study included 68 patients with cN1 breast cancer undergoing NAC from April 2019 to August 2021. Patients with biopsy-proven metastatic clip-marked LNs (clipped LNs) underwent eight cycles of NAC. Ultrasonography (US) was performed to evaluate the effect of the treatment on the clipped LNs, and FNAC was performed after NAC. Patients with ycN0 status determined using FNAC underwent SNB. Those with positive results for FNAC or SNB underwent axillary LN dissection. Histopathology results and FNA were compared for clipped LNs after NAC. Results: Of the 68 cases, 53 were ycN0 and 15 were clinically positive LNs after NAC (ycN1) on US. Further, 13% (7/53) of all ycN0 and 60% (9/15) of all ycN1 cases showed residual metastasis in the LNs on FNAC. Conclusion: FNAC was diagnostically useful for patients with ycN0 status on US imaging. Using FNAC for LNs after NAC helped avoid unnecessary SNB in 13% of the cases.","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":"67 4","pages":"378-387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Impact of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology on Sentinel Node Biopsy after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Core Needle Biopsy-Proven Metastatic Lymph Nodes.\",\"authors\":\"Rikiya Nakamura, Shouko Hayama, Satoshi Yoshimura, Makiko Itami, Akinobu Araki, Akiko Odaka, Naohito Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been increasingly performed for patients with lymph node (LN)-positive (cN1) breast cancer that converted to LN-negative (ycN0) status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aimed to clarify the SNB avoidance rates using fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for metastatic LNs after NAC. Methods: This study included 68 patients with cN1 breast cancer undergoing NAC from April 2019 to August 2021. Patients with biopsy-proven metastatic clip-marked LNs (clipped LNs) underwent eight cycles of NAC. Ultrasonography (US) was performed to evaluate the effect of the treatment on the clipped LNs, and FNAC was performed after NAC. Patients with ycN0 status determined using FNAC underwent SNB. Those with positive results for FNAC or SNB underwent axillary LN dissection. Histopathology results and FNA were compared for clipped LNs after NAC. Results: Of the 68 cases, 53 were ycN0 and 15 were clinically positive LNs after NAC (ycN1) on US. Further, 13% (7/53) of all ycN0 and 60% (9/15) of all ycN1 cases showed residual metastasis in the LNs on FNAC. Conclusion: FNAC was diagnostically useful for patients with ycN0 status on US imaging. Using FNAC for LNs after NAC helped avoid unnecessary SNB in 13% of the cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"volume\":\"67 4\",\"pages\":\"378-387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529721\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)越来越多地用于淋巴结(LN)阳性(cN1)乳腺癌患者,这些患者在新辅助化疗(NAC)后转为LN阴性(ycN0)状态。本研究旨在通过细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)明确NAC后转移性LNs的SNB避免率。方法:本研究纳入了2019年4月至2021年8月接受NAC治疗的68例cN1乳腺癌患者。活检证实的转移性夹子标记的LNs (clipped LNs)患者经历了8个周期的NAC。超声检查(US)评估治疗对夹持的LNs的影响,NAC后行FNAC。使用FNAC确定ycN0状态的患者行SNB。FNAC或SNB阳性的患者行腋窝淋巴结清扫术。比较NAC后剪断的LNs的组织病理学结果和FNA。结果:68例患者中,53例为ycN0, 15例为临床阳性LNs。此外,13%(7/53)的ycN0病例和60%(9/15)的ycN1病例在FNAC的LNs上显示残留转移。结论:FNAC对ycN0患者的超声显像诊断有用。在NAC后使用FNAC可以避免13%的病例出现不必要的SNB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Impact of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology on Sentinel Node Biopsy after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Core Needle Biopsy-Proven Metastatic Lymph Nodes.
Introduction: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been increasingly performed for patients with lymph node (LN)-positive (cN1) breast cancer that converted to LN-negative (ycN0) status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aimed to clarify the SNB avoidance rates using fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for metastatic LNs after NAC. Methods: This study included 68 patients with cN1 breast cancer undergoing NAC from April 2019 to August 2021. Patients with biopsy-proven metastatic clip-marked LNs (clipped LNs) underwent eight cycles of NAC. Ultrasonography (US) was performed to evaluate the effect of the treatment on the clipped LNs, and FNAC was performed after NAC. Patients with ycN0 status determined using FNAC underwent SNB. Those with positive results for FNAC or SNB underwent axillary LN dissection. Histopathology results and FNA were compared for clipped LNs after NAC. Results: Of the 68 cases, 53 were ycN0 and 15 were clinically positive LNs after NAC (ycN1) on US. Further, 13% (7/53) of all ycN0 and 60% (9/15) of all ycN1 cases showed residual metastasis in the LNs on FNAC. Conclusion: FNAC was diagnostically useful for patients with ycN0 status on US imaging. Using FNAC for LNs after NAC helped avoid unnecessary SNB in 13% of the cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信