Markus Knuf, Marie-Laure Charkaluk, Phung Nguyen The Nguyen, Ignacio Salamanca de la Cueva, Petra Köbrunner, Lauren Mason, Maurine Duchenne, Valérie Berlaimont
{"title":"34周以下和/或1500克以下出生的极重度和极中度早产儿的五价和六价疫苗接种:一项系统文献综述。","authors":"Markus Knuf, Marie-Laure Charkaluk, Phung Nguyen The Nguyen, Ignacio Salamanca de la Cueva, Petra Köbrunner, Lauren Mason, Maurine Duchenne, Valérie Berlaimont","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2191575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debate regarding vaccinating high-risk infants with penta- and hexavalent vaccines persists, despite their good immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile in healthy full-term infants. We report the findings of a systematic literature search that aimed to present data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, impact, compliance and completion of penta- and hexavalent vaccination in high-risk infants, including premature newborns. Data from the 14 studies included in the review showed that the immunogenicity and the safety profile of penta- and hexavalent vaccines in preterm infants was generally similar to those seen in full-term infants, with the exception of an increase in cardiorespiratory adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia and desaturation following vaccination in preterm infants. Despite recommendations of vaccinating preterm infants according to their actual age, and the relatively high completion rate of the primary immunization schedule, vaccination was often delayed, increasing the vulnerability of this high-risk population to vaccine-preventable diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2191575"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/b3/KHVI_19_2191575.PMC10120554.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penta- and hexavalent vaccination of extremely and very-to-moderate preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks and/or under 1500 g: A systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Knuf, Marie-Laure Charkaluk, Phung Nguyen The Nguyen, Ignacio Salamanca de la Cueva, Petra Köbrunner, Lauren Mason, Maurine Duchenne, Valérie Berlaimont\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21645515.2023.2191575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Debate regarding vaccinating high-risk infants with penta- and hexavalent vaccines persists, despite their good immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile in healthy full-term infants. We report the findings of a systematic literature search that aimed to present data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, impact, compliance and completion of penta- and hexavalent vaccination in high-risk infants, including premature newborns. Data from the 14 studies included in the review showed that the immunogenicity and the safety profile of penta- and hexavalent vaccines in preterm infants was generally similar to those seen in full-term infants, with the exception of an increase in cardiorespiratory adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia and desaturation following vaccination in preterm infants. Despite recommendations of vaccinating preterm infants according to their actual age, and the relatively high completion rate of the primary immunization schedule, vaccination was often delayed, increasing the vulnerability of this high-risk population to vaccine-preventable diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"2191575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/b3/KHVI_19_2191575.PMC10120554.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2191575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2191575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Penta- and hexavalent vaccination of extremely and very-to-moderate preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks and/or under 1500 g: A systematic literature review.
Debate regarding vaccinating high-risk infants with penta- and hexavalent vaccines persists, despite their good immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile in healthy full-term infants. We report the findings of a systematic literature search that aimed to present data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, impact, compliance and completion of penta- and hexavalent vaccination in high-risk infants, including premature newborns. Data from the 14 studies included in the review showed that the immunogenicity and the safety profile of penta- and hexavalent vaccines in preterm infants was generally similar to those seen in full-term infants, with the exception of an increase in cardiorespiratory adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia and desaturation following vaccination in preterm infants. Despite recommendations of vaccinating preterm infants according to their actual age, and the relatively high completion rate of the primary immunization schedule, vaccination was often delayed, increasing the vulnerability of this high-risk population to vaccine-preventable diseases.
期刊介绍:
(formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619)
Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.