用于术前规划的信息量大且可靠的韧带分段。

Frontiers in radiology Pub Date : 2022-05-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fradi.2022.866974
Oeslle Lucena, Pedro Borges, Jorge Cardoso, Keyoumars Ashkan, Rachel Sparks, Sebastien Ourselin
{"title":"用于术前规划的信息量大且可靠的韧带分段。","authors":"Oeslle Lucena, Pedro Borges, Jorge Cardoso, Keyoumars Ashkan, Rachel Sparks, Sebastien Ourselin","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2022.866974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10<i>mm</i>. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning.\",\"authors\":\"Oeslle Lucena, Pedro Borges, Jorge Cardoso, Keyoumars Ashkan, Rachel Sparks, Sebastien Ourselin\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fradi.2022.866974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10<i>mm</i>. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10365092/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2022.866974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别白质(WM)束以确定术前手术计划的有力区域是一项具有挑战性的任务。人工WM束注释经常被使用,但这种方法耗时较长,存在评分者之间和评分者内部的差异,而且弥散核磁共振成像固有的噪声可能会使人工判读变得困难。因此,在临床实践中,手术时需要直接电刺激来精确定位 WM 束。WM束分割不可靠度的测量方法对于指导手术规划和操作非常重要。在本研究中,我们利用深度学习进行可靠的束分割,并结合不确定性量化来测量分割的不可靠度。我们使用三维 U-Net 对白质束进行分割。然后,我们分别使用测试时间遗漏和测试时间增强来估计模型和数据的不确定性。我们使用基于体积的校准方法,根据估计的不确定性计算出有代表性的预测概率。在我们的研究结果中,我们得到的 Dice 值≈0.82,与多标签分割和 Hausdorff 距离 mm 的最先进水平相当。我们证明了体积方差和分割误差之间的高度正相关性,这表明对切口分割和不确定性估计的可靠性有很好的衡量标准。最后,我们表明,与未经校准的预测体积相比,校准的预测体积更有可能包含地面实况分割体积。这项研究朝着为临床决策提供更明智、更可靠的 WM 道分割迈出了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning.

Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning.

Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning.

Informative and Reliable Tract Segmentation for Preoperative Planning.

Identifying white matter (WM) tracts to locate eloquent areas for preoperative surgical planning is a challenging task. Manual WM tract annotations are often used but they are time-consuming, suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability, and noise intrinsic to diffusion MRI may make manual interpretation difficult. As a result, in clinical practice direct electrical stimulation is necessary to precisely locate WM tracts during surgery. A measure of WM tract segmentation unreliability could be important to guide surgical planning and operations. In this study, we use deep learning to perform reliable tract segmentation in combination with uncertainty quantification to measure segmentation unreliability. We use a 3D U-Net to segment white matter tracts. We then estimate model and data uncertainty using test time dropout and test time augmentation, respectively. We use a volume-based calibration approach to compute representative predicted probabilities from the estimated uncertainties. In our findings, we obtain a Dice of ≈0.82 which is comparable to the state-of-the-art for multi-label segmentation and Hausdorff distance <10mm. We demonstrate a high positive correlation between volume variance and segmentation errors, which indicates a good measure of reliability for tract segmentation ad uncertainty estimation. Finally, we show that calibrated predicted volumes are more likely to encompass the ground truth segmentation volume than uncalibrated predicted volumes. This study is a step toward more informed and reliable WM tract segmentation for clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信