人工智能建模评估肿瘤患者心血管疾病的风险。

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Samer S Al-Droubi, Eiman Jahangir, Karl M Kochendorfer, Marianna Krive, Michal Laufer-Perl, Dan Gilon, Tochukwu M Okwuosa, Christopher P Gans, Joshua H Arnold, Shakthi T Bhaskar, Hesham A Yasin, Jacob Krive
{"title":"人工智能建模评估肿瘤患者心血管疾病的风险。","authors":"Samer S Al-Droubi,&nbsp;Eiman Jahangir,&nbsp;Karl M Kochendorfer,&nbsp;Marianna Krive,&nbsp;Michal Laufer-Perl,&nbsp;Dan Gilon,&nbsp;Tochukwu M Okwuosa,&nbsp;Christopher P Gans,&nbsp;Joshua H Arnold,&nbsp;Shakthi T Bhaskar,&nbsp;Hesham A Yasin,&nbsp;Jacob Krive","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There are no comprehensive machine learning (ML) tools used by oncologists to assist with risk identification and referrals to cardio-oncology. This study applies ML algorithms to identify oncology patients at risk for cardiovascular disease for referrals to cardio-oncology and to generate risk scores to support quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>De-identified patient data were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Patients with breast, kidney, and B-cell lymphoma cancers were targeted. Additionally, the study included patients who received immunotherapy drugs for treatment of melanoma, lung cancer, or kidney cancer. Random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) ML models were applied to analyse each cohort: A total of 20 023 records were analysed (breast cancer, 6299; B-cell lymphoma, 9227; kidney cancer, 2047; and immunotherapy for three covered cancers, 2450). Data were divided randomly into training (80%) and test (20%) data sets. Random forest and ANN performed over 90% for accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). All ANN models performed better than RF models and produced accurate referrals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictive models are ready for translation into oncology practice to identify and care for patients who are at risk of cardiovascular disease. The models are being integrated with electronic health record application as a report of patients who should be referred to cardio-oncology for monitoring and/or tailored treatments. Models operationally support cardio-oncology practice. Limited validation identified 86% of the lymphoma and 58% of the kidney cancer patients with major risk for cardiotoxicity who were not referred to cardio-oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/4d/ztad031.PMC10393891.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence modelling to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients.\",\"authors\":\"Samer S Al-Droubi,&nbsp;Eiman Jahangir,&nbsp;Karl M Kochendorfer,&nbsp;Marianna Krive,&nbsp;Michal Laufer-Perl,&nbsp;Dan Gilon,&nbsp;Tochukwu M Okwuosa,&nbsp;Christopher P Gans,&nbsp;Joshua H Arnold,&nbsp;Shakthi T Bhaskar,&nbsp;Hesham A Yasin,&nbsp;Jacob Krive\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There are no comprehensive machine learning (ML) tools used by oncologists to assist with risk identification and referrals to cardio-oncology. This study applies ML algorithms to identify oncology patients at risk for cardiovascular disease for referrals to cardio-oncology and to generate risk scores to support quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>De-identified patient data were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Patients with breast, kidney, and B-cell lymphoma cancers were targeted. Additionally, the study included patients who received immunotherapy drugs for treatment of melanoma, lung cancer, or kidney cancer. Random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) ML models were applied to analyse each cohort: A total of 20 023 records were analysed (breast cancer, 6299; B-cell lymphoma, 9227; kidney cancer, 2047; and immunotherapy for three covered cancers, 2450). Data were divided randomly into training (80%) and test (20%) data sets. Random forest and ANN performed over 90% for accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). All ANN models performed better than RF models and produced accurate referrals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictive models are ready for translation into oncology practice to identify and care for patients who are at risk of cardiovascular disease. The models are being integrated with electronic health record application as a report of patients who should be referred to cardio-oncology for monitoring and/or tailored treatments. Models operationally support cardio-oncology practice. Limited validation identified 86% of the lymphoma and 58% of the kidney cancer patients with major risk for cardiotoxicity who were not referred to cardio-oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/4d/ztad031.PMC10393891.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:目前还没有全面的机器学习(ML)工具被肿瘤学家用来协助风险识别和转诊到心脏肿瘤学。本研究应用机器学习算法来识别有心血管疾病风险的肿瘤患者,以便转诊到心脏肿瘤科,并生成风险评分以支持护理质量。方法和结果:从范德比尔特大学医学中心获得去身份识别的患者数据。针对乳腺癌、肾癌和b细胞淋巴瘤患者。此外,该研究还包括接受免疫治疗药物治疗黑色素瘤、肺癌或肾癌的患者。随机森林(RF)和人工神经网络(ANN) ML模型应用于分析每个队列:共分析了20,023条记录(乳腺癌,6299;b细胞淋巴瘤,9227;肾癌,2047;三种癌症的免疫治疗(2450)。数据随机分为训练(80%)和测试(20%)数据集。随机森林和人工神经网络的准确率和曲线下面积(AUC)均超过90%。所有人工神经网络模型的表现都优于射频模型,并产生了准确的转诊。结论:预测模型已经准备好转化为肿瘤学实践,以识别和护理有心血管疾病风险的患者。这些模型正在与电子健康记录应用程序集成,作为应转介到心脏肿瘤科进行监测和/或定制治疗的患者的报告。模型操作支持心脏肿瘤学实践。有限的验证发现86%的淋巴瘤患者和58%的肾癌患者没有转诊到心脏肿瘤学,有主要的心脏毒性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence modelling to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients.

Artificial intelligence modelling to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients.

Artificial intelligence modelling to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients.

Artificial intelligence modelling to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease in oncology patients.

Aims: There are no comprehensive machine learning (ML) tools used by oncologists to assist with risk identification and referrals to cardio-oncology. This study applies ML algorithms to identify oncology patients at risk for cardiovascular disease for referrals to cardio-oncology and to generate risk scores to support quality of care.

Methods and results: De-identified patient data were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Patients with breast, kidney, and B-cell lymphoma cancers were targeted. Additionally, the study included patients who received immunotherapy drugs for treatment of melanoma, lung cancer, or kidney cancer. Random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) ML models were applied to analyse each cohort: A total of 20 023 records were analysed (breast cancer, 6299; B-cell lymphoma, 9227; kidney cancer, 2047; and immunotherapy for three covered cancers, 2450). Data were divided randomly into training (80%) and test (20%) data sets. Random forest and ANN performed over 90% for accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). All ANN models performed better than RF models and produced accurate referrals.

Conclusion: Predictive models are ready for translation into oncology practice to identify and care for patients who are at risk of cardiovascular disease. The models are being integrated with electronic health record application as a report of patients who should be referred to cardio-oncology for monitoring and/or tailored treatments. Models operationally support cardio-oncology practice. Limited validation identified 86% of the lymphoma and 58% of the kidney cancer patients with major risk for cardiotoxicity who were not referred to cardio-oncology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信