David C G Sainsbury, Caroline C Williams, Sophie Butterworth, Catherine de Blacam, Matthew J Fell, Joanne Mullen, William Breakey, Colm Murphy, Peter D Hodgkinson, Yvonne Wren
{"title":"影响腭裂初次修复后伶牙俐齿言语效果的患者因素:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"David C G Sainsbury, Caroline C Williams, Sophie Butterworth, Catherine de Blacam, Matthew J Fell, Joanne Mullen, William Breakey, Colm Murphy, Peter D Hodgkinson, Yvonne Wren","doi":"10.1177/10556656231191384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identification of patient factors influencing velopharyngeal function for speech following initial cleft palate repair.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A literature search of relevant databases from inception until 2018 was performed using medical subject headings and keywords related to cleft palate, palatoplasty and speech assessment. Following three stage screening data extraction was performed.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant literature.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>Three hundred and eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data on 47 658 participants.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Individuals undergoing initial palatoplasty.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Studies including participants undergoing initial cleft palate repair where the frequency of secondary speech surgery and/or velopharyngeal function for speech was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient factors reported included cleft phenotype (95% studies), biological sex (64%), syndrome diagnosis (44%), hearing loss (28%), developmental delay (16%), Robin Sequence (16%) and 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (11%). Meta-analysis provided strong evidence that rates of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal dysfunction varied according to cleft phenotype (Veau I best outcomes, Veau IV worst outcomes), Robin Sequence and syndrome diagnosis. There was no evidence that biological sex was associated with worse outcomes. Many studies were poor quality with minimal follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meta-analysis demonstrated the association of certain patient factors with speech outcome, however the quality of the evidence was low. Uniform, prospective, multi-centre documentation of preoperative characteristics and speech outcomes is required to characterise risk factors for post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency for speech.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Registered with PROSPERO CRD42017051624.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Factors Influencing Speech Outcomes in Velopharyngeal Function Following Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"David C G Sainsbury, Caroline C Williams, Sophie Butterworth, Catherine de Blacam, Matthew J Fell, Joanne Mullen, William Breakey, Colm Murphy, Peter D Hodgkinson, Yvonne Wren\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656231191384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identification of patient factors influencing velopharyngeal function for speech following initial cleft palate repair.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A literature search of relevant databases from inception until 2018 was performed using medical subject headings and keywords related to cleft palate, palatoplasty and speech assessment. Following three stage screening data extraction was performed.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant literature.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>Three hundred and eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data on 47 658 participants.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Individuals undergoing initial palatoplasty.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Studies including participants undergoing initial cleft palate repair where the frequency of secondary speech surgery and/or velopharyngeal function for speech was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient factors reported included cleft phenotype (95% studies), biological sex (64%), syndrome diagnosis (44%), hearing loss (28%), developmental delay (16%), Robin Sequence (16%) and 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (11%). Meta-analysis provided strong evidence that rates of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal dysfunction varied according to cleft phenotype (Veau I best outcomes, Veau IV worst outcomes), Robin Sequence and syndrome diagnosis. There was no evidence that biological sex was associated with worse outcomes. Many studies were poor quality with minimal follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meta-analysis demonstrated the association of certain patient factors with speech outcome, however the quality of the evidence was low. Uniform, prospective, multi-centre documentation of preoperative characteristics and speech outcomes is required to characterise risk factors for post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency for speech.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Registered with PROSPERO CRD42017051624.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231191384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231191384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的确定影响腭裂初次修复后发音的咽喉功能的患者因素:使用医学主题词和与腭裂、腭成形术和言语评估相关的关键词,对从开始到 2018 年的相关数据库进行文献检索。经过三个阶段的筛选后,进行了数据提取:对相关文献进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:383项研究符合纳入标准,包括47 658名参与者的数据:干预措施:接受初次腭裂成形术的患者:主要结果测量:包括接受初次腭裂修复的参与者的研究,其中记录了二次言语手术和/或用于言语的咽喉功能的频率:报告的患者因素包括腭裂表型(95%的研究)、生理性别(64%)、综合征诊断(44%)、听力损失(28%)、发育迟缓(16%)、罗宾序列(16%)和22q11.2微缺失综合征(11%)。Meta 分析提供了强有力的证据,证明二次手术和显喉功能障碍的发生率因裂隙表型(Veau I 最佳结果、Veau IV 最差结果)、罗宾序列和综合征诊断而异。没有证据表明生理性别与较差的结果有关。许多研究质量不高,随访次数极少:Meta分析表明,某些患者因素与语言治疗效果有关,但证据质量较低。需要对术前特征和言语效果进行统一、前瞻性、多中心的记录,以确定腭成形术后口咽发育不全对言语影响的风险因素:注册于 PROSPERO CRD42017051624。
Patient Factors Influencing Speech Outcomes in Velopharyngeal Function Following Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objective: Identification of patient factors influencing velopharyngeal function for speech following initial cleft palate repair.
Design: A literature search of relevant databases from inception until 2018 was performed using medical subject headings and keywords related to cleft palate, palatoplasty and speech assessment. Following three stage screening data extraction was performed.
Setting: Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant literature.
Patients/participants: Three hundred and eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data on 47 658 participants.
Main outcome measures: Studies including participants undergoing initial cleft palate repair where the frequency of secondary speech surgery and/or velopharyngeal function for speech was recorded.
Results: Patient factors reported included cleft phenotype (95% studies), biological sex (64%), syndrome diagnosis (44%), hearing loss (28%), developmental delay (16%), Robin Sequence (16%) and 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (11%). Meta-analysis provided strong evidence that rates of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal dysfunction varied according to cleft phenotype (Veau I best outcomes, Veau IV worst outcomes), Robin Sequence and syndrome diagnosis. There was no evidence that biological sex was associated with worse outcomes. Many studies were poor quality with minimal follow-up.
Conclusions: Meta-analysis demonstrated the association of certain patient factors with speech outcome, however the quality of the evidence was low. Uniform, prospective, multi-centre documentation of preoperative characteristics and speech outcomes is required to characterise risk factors for post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency for speech.
Systematic review registration: Registered with PROSPERO CRD42017051624.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.