经验吸附动力学:比较线性和非线性回归分析,强调需要高通量分析。

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fernando H do Nascimento, Carlos M C Infante, Erico A O Pereira, Samara T Leite, Jorge C Masini
{"title":"经验吸附动力学:比较线性和非线性回归分析,强调需要高通量分析。","authors":"Fernando H do Nascimento,&nbsp;Carlos M C Infante,&nbsp;Erico A O Pereira,&nbsp;Samara T Leite,&nbsp;Jorge C Masini","doi":"10.1080/03601234.2023.2238591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper evaluates linear and nonlinear regression analysis to describe the empirical adsorption kinetics using pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) models. These models have been used to characterize the performance of adsorbents for environmental remediation and environmental modeling. Data were simulated using the PFO and PSO models with 1, 2, and 5% noise levels and fitted by nonlinear and linearized PFO and PSO equations. Nonlinear regression analysis provided rate constants and adsorption capacities with better accuracy than linearization. Besides the correlation coefficient, Chi-square and residual plot analysis helped choose the proper model to describe the adsorbent efficiency and validate the results. Both models and the NLR fitting were employed to reevaluate data obtained in our research group, including the adsorption of Hg(II) on thiol-modified vermiculite, glyphosate on soils rich in aluminum and iron oxides, phosphate on Fe(III) polyhydroxy cations modified montmorillonite, and paraquat on soil and vermiculite. While fitting the simulated data indicates an unequivocal and correct kinetic model, fitting the experimental data is not straightforward, suggesting mixed models rule the adsorption and that a large number of data points, especially at the initial steps of adsorption, provided by high throughput analysis, help to improve the kinetic modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":15720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical adsorption kinetics: comparing linear and nonlinear regression analysis emphasizing the need for high throughput analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fernando H do Nascimento,&nbsp;Carlos M C Infante,&nbsp;Erico A O Pereira,&nbsp;Samara T Leite,&nbsp;Jorge C Masini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03601234.2023.2238591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper evaluates linear and nonlinear regression analysis to describe the empirical adsorption kinetics using pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) models. These models have been used to characterize the performance of adsorbents for environmental remediation and environmental modeling. Data were simulated using the PFO and PSO models with 1, 2, and 5% noise levels and fitted by nonlinear and linearized PFO and PSO equations. Nonlinear regression analysis provided rate constants and adsorption capacities with better accuracy than linearization. Besides the correlation coefficient, Chi-square and residual plot analysis helped choose the proper model to describe the adsorbent efficiency and validate the results. Both models and the NLR fitting were employed to reevaluate data obtained in our research group, including the adsorption of Hg(II) on thiol-modified vermiculite, glyphosate on soils rich in aluminum and iron oxides, phosphate on Fe(III) polyhydroxy cations modified montmorillonite, and paraquat on soil and vermiculite. While fitting the simulated data indicates an unequivocal and correct kinetic model, fitting the experimental data is not straightforward, suggesting mixed models rule the adsorption and that a large number of data points, especially at the initial steps of adsorption, provided by high throughput analysis, help to improve the kinetic modeling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2023.2238591\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2023.2238591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文用拟一阶(PFO)和拟二阶(PSO)模型对描述经验吸附动力学的线性和非线性回归分析进行了评价。这些模型已被用于表征吸附剂的环境修复和环境建模的性能。采用噪声水平分别为1、2和5%的PFO和PSO模型对数据进行模拟,并采用非线性和线性化的PFO和PSO方程进行拟合。非线性回归分析提供了比线性化更好的速率常数和吸附量。除相关系数外,卡方分析和残差图分析有助于选择合适的模型来描述吸附剂效率并验证结果。我们使用模型和NLR拟合来重新评估我们研究小组获得的数据,包括汞(II)在硫醇改性蛭石上的吸附,草甘膦在富含铝和铁氧化物的土壤上的吸附,磷酸盐在铁(III)多羟基阳离子改性蒙脱土上的吸附,以及百草枯在土壤和蛭石上的吸附。虽然模拟数据的拟合表明了一个明确而正确的动力学模型,但拟合实验数据并不简单,这表明混合模型统治了吸附,并且高通量分析提供的大量数据点,特别是在吸附的初始步骤,有助于改进动力学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical adsorption kinetics: comparing linear and nonlinear regression analysis emphasizing the need for high throughput analysis.

This paper evaluates linear and nonlinear regression analysis to describe the empirical adsorption kinetics using pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) models. These models have been used to characterize the performance of adsorbents for environmental remediation and environmental modeling. Data were simulated using the PFO and PSO models with 1, 2, and 5% noise levels and fitted by nonlinear and linearized PFO and PSO equations. Nonlinear regression analysis provided rate constants and adsorption capacities with better accuracy than linearization. Besides the correlation coefficient, Chi-square and residual plot analysis helped choose the proper model to describe the adsorbent efficiency and validate the results. Both models and the NLR fitting were employed to reevaluate data obtained in our research group, including the adsorption of Hg(II) on thiol-modified vermiculite, glyphosate on soils rich in aluminum and iron oxides, phosphate on Fe(III) polyhydroxy cations modified montmorillonite, and paraquat on soil and vermiculite. While fitting the simulated data indicates an unequivocal and correct kinetic model, fitting the experimental data is not straightforward, suggesting mixed models rule the adsorption and that a large number of data points, especially at the initial steps of adsorption, provided by high throughput analysis, help to improve the kinetic modeling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: 12 issues per year Abstracted/indexed in: Agricola; Analytical Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; BioSciences Information Service of Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS); CAB Abstracts; CAB AGBiotech News and Information; CAB Irrigation & Drainage Abstracts; CAB Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts; Chemical Abstracts Service Plus; CSA Aluminum Industry Abstracts; CSA ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology and Engineering; CSA ASFA 3 Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Quality; CSA ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts; CSA Ecology Abstracts; CSA Entomology Abstracts; CSA Environmental Engineering Abstracts; CSA Health & Safety Science Abstracts; CSA Pollution Abstracts; CSA Toxicology Abstracts; CSA Water Resource Abstracts; EBSCOhost Online Research Databases; Elsevier BIOBASE/Current Awareness in Biological Sciences; Elsevier Engineering Information: EMBASE/Excerpta Medica/ Engineering Index/COMPENDEX PLUS; Environment Abstracts; Environmental Knowledge; Food Science and Technology Abstracts; Geo Abstracts; Geobase; Food Science; Index Medicus/ MEDLINE; INIST-Pascal/ CNRS; NIOSHTIC; ISI BIOSIS Previews; Pesticides; Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes: Analytical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; PubSCIENCE; Reference Update; Research Alert; Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE); and Water Resources Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信