低剂量CBCT采集方案在干人头骨术前植入部位评估中的比较评价。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Aditya Tadinada
{"title":"低剂量CBCT采集方案在干人头骨术前植入部位评估中的比较评价。","authors":"Aditya Tadinada","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restoration of edentulous sites with dental implants is increasingly becoming a popular choice. Cross-sectional 3D imaging using CBCT provides a superior view of the implant site to help the clinician plan the procedure better. In spite of the advantages, radiation dose remains a concern. The evolution of lower dose protocols is ongoing but whether those acquisition protocols yield comparable diagnostic information is still not well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a low dose, 180˚ rotational CBCT acquisition protocol for evaluating a potential implant site in comparison with a conventional 360˚ rotational acquisition. Ten dentate and partially edentulous dry human skulls were chosen for this study. Each skull was imaged using a 360˚ and a 180˚ rotational acquisition on a J. Morita's Accuitomo CBCT scanner. 82 randomized implant sites, 40 in the maxilla and 42 in the mandible were analyzed. Evaluation of cortical and trabecular bone, proximity to crucial structures such as the inferior alveolar nerve canal and the maxillary sinus, and width of the potential placement site were measured. An oral surgeon and an oral radiologist rated the diagnostic efficacy of the scans by evaluating the above characteristics. Statistical evaluation of the data with linear regression showed significant agreement between both protocol measurements. Kappa analyses yielded a good inter-observer agreement. In this ex-vivo study, there was no significant difference in both the qualitative and quantitate evaluation between the conventional 36 0˚ acquisition protocol and  the modified lower dose 180˚ rotational protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":50101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of a lower dose CBCT acquisition protocol for preoperative implant site assessment in dry human skulls.\",\"authors\":\"Aditya Tadinada\",\"doi\":\"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Restoration of edentulous sites with dental implants is increasingly becoming a popular choice. Cross-sectional 3D imaging using CBCT provides a superior view of the implant site to help the clinician plan the procedure better. In spite of the advantages, radiation dose remains a concern. The evolution of lower dose protocols is ongoing but whether those acquisition protocols yield comparable diagnostic information is still not well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a low dose, 180˚ rotational CBCT acquisition protocol for evaluating a potential implant site in comparison with a conventional 360˚ rotational acquisition. Ten dentate and partially edentulous dry human skulls were chosen for this study. Each skull was imaged using a 360˚ and a 180˚ rotational acquisition on a J. Morita's Accuitomo CBCT scanner. 82 randomized implant sites, 40 in the maxilla and 42 in the mandible were analyzed. Evaluation of cortical and trabecular bone, proximity to crucial structures such as the inferior alveolar nerve canal and the maxillary sinus, and width of the potential placement site were measured. An oral surgeon and an oral radiologist rated the diagnostic efficacy of the scans by evaluating the above characteristics. Statistical evaluation of the data with linear regression showed significant agreement between both protocol measurements. Kappa analyses yielded a good inter-observer agreement. In this ex-vivo study, there was no significant difference in both the qualitative and quantitate evaluation between the conventional 36 0˚ acquisition protocol and  the modified lower dose 180˚ rotational protocol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙种植体修复无牙部位越来越成为一种流行的选择。使用CBCT的横断面3D成像提供了植入部位的优越视图,以帮助临床医生更好地计划手术。尽管有这些优点,但辐射剂量仍然是一个问题。低剂量方案的发展正在进行中,但这些获取方案是否产生可比的诊断信息仍未得到很好的确定。本研究的目的是评估低剂量、180˚旋转CBCT采集方案与传统360˚旋转采集方案在评估潜在种植部位方面的诊断效果。本研究选择了10个有齿和部分无齿的干人头骨。每个颅骨在J. Morita’s Accuitomo CBCT扫描仪上使用360°和180°旋转采集成像。随机选择种植体82个,上颌40个,下颌骨42个。评估皮质骨和骨小梁,是否接近关键结构,如下牙槽神经管和上颌窦,以及潜在放置位置的宽度。口腔外科医生和口腔放射科医生通过评估上述特征来评估扫描的诊断效果。用线性回归对数据进行统计评估,结果显示两种方案测量结果之间存在显著的一致性。Kappa分析产生了良好的观察者间协议。在离体研究中,常规的360˚获取方案与改进的低剂量180˚旋转方案在定性和定量评价上均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of a lower dose CBCT acquisition protocol for preoperative implant site assessment in dry human skulls.

Restoration of edentulous sites with dental implants is increasingly becoming a popular choice. Cross-sectional 3D imaging using CBCT provides a superior view of the implant site to help the clinician plan the procedure better. In spite of the advantages, radiation dose remains a concern. The evolution of lower dose protocols is ongoing but whether those acquisition protocols yield comparable diagnostic information is still not well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a low dose, 180˚ rotational CBCT acquisition protocol for evaluating a potential implant site in comparison with a conventional 360˚ rotational acquisition. Ten dentate and partially edentulous dry human skulls were chosen for this study. Each skull was imaged using a 360˚ and a 180˚ rotational acquisition on a J. Morita's Accuitomo CBCT scanner. 82 randomized implant sites, 40 in the maxilla and 42 in the mandible were analyzed. Evaluation of cortical and trabecular bone, proximity to crucial structures such as the inferior alveolar nerve canal and the maxillary sinus, and width of the potential placement site were measured. An oral surgeon and an oral radiologist rated the diagnostic efficacy of the scans by evaluating the above characteristics. Statistical evaluation of the data with linear regression showed significant agreement between both protocol measurements. Kappa analyses yielded a good inter-observer agreement. In this ex-vivo study, there was no significant difference in both the qualitative and quantitate evaluation between the conventional 36 0˚ acquisition protocol and  the modified lower dose 180˚ rotational protocol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Implantology
Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and of the American Academy of Implant Prosthodontics, is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. Implant basics, prosthetics, pharmaceuticals, the latest research in implantology, implant surgery, and advanced implant procedures are just some of the topics covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信