狗在急诊室的耳部和直肠温度的比较

IF 1.7 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Rebecca Smith, Alicia Mastrocco, Jennifer Prittie, Joel Weltman
{"title":"狗在急诊室的耳部和直肠温度的比较","authors":"Rebecca Smith,&nbsp;Alicia Mastrocco,&nbsp;Jennifer Prittie,&nbsp;Joel Weltman","doi":"10.2147/VMRR.S411935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare rectal and aural temperatures in canines presenting to a small animal emergency room.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cohort study conducted between June 2022 and October 2022. One hundred and fifty-two dogs were evaluated that were presented to a private practice emergency room. Temperatures were obtained on presentation using both an aural Braun ExacTemp and a rectal Vet-Temp Rapid Digital Thermometer. The order of temperature measurement was randomized and recorded. Dogs were classified into three groups based on recorded temperature; normothermic (n = 105), hypothermic (n = 24), and hyperthermic (n = 23). Additional recorded parameters included: patient signalment, heart rate, respiratory rate, presence or absence of aural debris, coat length (classified as short, medium or long), body weight, body condition score, pain score, as well as venous lactate and non-invasive blood pressure, if performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall aural temperatures were significantly lower than rectal temperatures. The average rectal and aural temperatures were 38.7°C (range 36.6-40.7°C) and 38.3°C (range 35.7°C-40.4°C), respectively. Among all canines, there was a moderate, statistically significant relationship between rectal and aural temperatures (r = 0.636; p < 0.001) and this relationship remained significant with a weaker relationship for normothermic dogs (r = 0.411; p < 0.001). For hyperthermic and hypothermic dogs, there was not a statistically significant relationship between rectal and aural temperatures. Hyperthermic dogs had a significantly higher respiratory rate than other groups and hypothermic dogs were more likely to have a short haircoat. Lastly, ambient temperature, but not humidity, influenced patient temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found aural temperatures were consistently lower than rectal temperatures in dogs with both normal and abnormal rectal temperatures. Aural thermometry may not be an acceptable method of temperature measurement in the emergency patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":75300,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/43/vmrr-14-125.PMC10387255.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Aural and Rectal Temperature in Dogs Presenting to an Emergency Room.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Smith,&nbsp;Alicia Mastrocco,&nbsp;Jennifer Prittie,&nbsp;Joel Weltman\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/VMRR.S411935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare rectal and aural temperatures in canines presenting to a small animal emergency room.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cohort study conducted between June 2022 and October 2022. One hundred and fifty-two dogs were evaluated that were presented to a private practice emergency room. Temperatures were obtained on presentation using both an aural Braun ExacTemp and a rectal Vet-Temp Rapid Digital Thermometer. The order of temperature measurement was randomized and recorded. Dogs were classified into three groups based on recorded temperature; normothermic (n = 105), hypothermic (n = 24), and hyperthermic (n = 23). Additional recorded parameters included: patient signalment, heart rate, respiratory rate, presence or absence of aural debris, coat length (classified as short, medium or long), body weight, body condition score, pain score, as well as venous lactate and non-invasive blood pressure, if performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall aural temperatures were significantly lower than rectal temperatures. The average rectal and aural temperatures were 38.7°C (range 36.6-40.7°C) and 38.3°C (range 35.7°C-40.4°C), respectively. Among all canines, there was a moderate, statistically significant relationship between rectal and aural temperatures (r = 0.636; p < 0.001) and this relationship remained significant with a weaker relationship for normothermic dogs (r = 0.411; p < 0.001). For hyperthermic and hypothermic dogs, there was not a statistically significant relationship between rectal and aural temperatures. Hyperthermic dogs had a significantly higher respiratory rate than other groups and hypothermic dogs were more likely to have a short haircoat. Lastly, ambient temperature, but not humidity, influenced patient temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found aural temperatures were consistently lower than rectal temperatures in dogs with both normal and abnormal rectal temperatures. Aural thermometry may not be an acceptable method of temperature measurement in the emergency patient cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/43/vmrr-14-125.PMC10387255.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S411935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S411935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较在小型动物急诊室就诊的犬的直肠和耳部温度。患者和方法:我们在2022年6月至2022年10月期间进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。152只狗被送到私人诊所急诊室接受评估。在就诊时使用耳部博朗ExacTemp和直肠Vet-Temp快速数字温度计获得温度。随机记录测温顺序。根据记录的温度将狗分为三组;常温(n = 105)、低温(n = 24)和高温(n = 23)。其他记录的参数包括:患者信号、心率、呼吸频率、有无听觉碎片、被毛长度(分为短、中或长)、体重、身体状况评分、疼痛评分以及静脉乳酸和无创血压(如果进行的话)。结果:整体耳温明显低于直肠温。直肠和耳部平均温度分别为38.7°C(范围36.6-40.7°C)和38.3°C(范围35.7 -40.4°C)。在所有犬科动物中,直肠和耳部温度之间存在中度的、有统计学意义的关系(r = 0.636;P < 0.001),这种关系仍然显著,但正常母狗的关系较弱(r = 0.411;P < 0.001)。对于体温过高和体温过低的狗,直肠和耳部温度之间没有统计学上显著的关系。体温过高的狗的呼吸频率明显高于其他组,而体温过低的狗更有可能有短毛。最后,环境温度,而不是湿度,影响患者的体温。结论:我们的研究发现,无论是直肠温度正常还是异常的狗,其耳部温度始终低于直肠温度。在急诊患者队列中,听觉测温可能不是一种可接受的测温方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Aural and Rectal Temperature in Dogs Presenting to an Emergency Room.

Comparison of Aural and Rectal Temperature in Dogs Presenting to an Emergency Room.

Purpose: To compare rectal and aural temperatures in canines presenting to a small animal emergency room.

Patients and methods: We performed a prospective cohort study conducted between June 2022 and October 2022. One hundred and fifty-two dogs were evaluated that were presented to a private practice emergency room. Temperatures were obtained on presentation using both an aural Braun ExacTemp and a rectal Vet-Temp Rapid Digital Thermometer. The order of temperature measurement was randomized and recorded. Dogs were classified into three groups based on recorded temperature; normothermic (n = 105), hypothermic (n = 24), and hyperthermic (n = 23). Additional recorded parameters included: patient signalment, heart rate, respiratory rate, presence or absence of aural debris, coat length (classified as short, medium or long), body weight, body condition score, pain score, as well as venous lactate and non-invasive blood pressure, if performed.

Results: The overall aural temperatures were significantly lower than rectal temperatures. The average rectal and aural temperatures were 38.7°C (range 36.6-40.7°C) and 38.3°C (range 35.7°C-40.4°C), respectively. Among all canines, there was a moderate, statistically significant relationship between rectal and aural temperatures (r = 0.636; p < 0.001) and this relationship remained significant with a weaker relationship for normothermic dogs (r = 0.411; p < 0.001). For hyperthermic and hypothermic dogs, there was not a statistically significant relationship between rectal and aural temperatures. Hyperthermic dogs had a significantly higher respiratory rate than other groups and hypothermic dogs were more likely to have a short haircoat. Lastly, ambient temperature, but not humidity, influenced patient temperature.

Conclusion: Our study found aural temperatures were consistently lower than rectal temperatures in dogs with both normal and abnormal rectal temperatures. Aural thermometry may not be an acceptable method of temperature measurement in the emergency patient cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信