Pietro Canzi, Elena Carlotto, Anna Simoncelli, Elvis Lafe, Andrea Scribante, Domenico Minervini, Matteo Nardo, Stefano Malpede, Luisa Chiapparini, Marco Benazzo
{"title":"O-MAR算法在MRI颅底评估中处理人工耳蜗相关伪影的有效性。","authors":"Pietro Canzi, Elena Carlotto, Anna Simoncelli, Elvis Lafe, Andrea Scribante, Domenico Minervini, Matteo Nardo, Stefano Malpede, Luisa Chiapparini, Marco Benazzo","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-N2434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess artifact size and MRI visibility when applying the \"Orthopedic-Metal Artifact Reduction\" (O-MAR) algorithm for cochlear implant (CI) scanning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two volunteers were submitted to 1.5 T MRI with an Ultra 3D CI receiver stimulator placed on their head. Four angular CI orientations were adopted: 90, 120, 135 and 160 degrees. Volunteers were scanned in each condition using T1w and T2w TSE sequences, as well as O-MAR sequences, in both axial and coronal planes. Quantitative comparisons were made of signal void and penumbra extent. Additionally, qualitative evaluations of global image quality, MRI readability with respect to 12 anatomical structures and visibility through the penumbra were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After application of the O-MAR protocol, the radius of the signal void reduced from 50.76 mm to 45.43 mm and from 49.22 mm to 40.15 mm on T1w and T2w TSE axial sequences, respectively (p < 0.05). Qualitatively, sequences acquired with O-MAR produced better outcomes in terms of image quality and anatomical depiction. Despite the area of the penumbra being increased for the O-MAR protocol, visibility through penumbra was improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of O-MAR may provide a complementary strategy to those already in use to obtain diagnostically useful MRI examinations in the presence of a CI, especially in case of skull base diseases requiring MRI monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"43 4","pages":"273-282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/9d/aoi-2023-04-273.PMC10366562.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The usefulness of the O-MAR algorithm in MRI skull base assessment to manage cochlear implant-related artifacts.\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Canzi, Elena Carlotto, Anna Simoncelli, Elvis Lafe, Andrea Scribante, Domenico Minervini, Matteo Nardo, Stefano Malpede, Luisa Chiapparini, Marco Benazzo\",\"doi\":\"10.14639/0392-100X-N2434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess artifact size and MRI visibility when applying the \\\"Orthopedic-Metal Artifact Reduction\\\" (O-MAR) algorithm for cochlear implant (CI) scanning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two volunteers were submitted to 1.5 T MRI with an Ultra 3D CI receiver stimulator placed on their head. Four angular CI orientations were adopted: 90, 120, 135 and 160 degrees. Volunteers were scanned in each condition using T1w and T2w TSE sequences, as well as O-MAR sequences, in both axial and coronal planes. Quantitative comparisons were made of signal void and penumbra extent. Additionally, qualitative evaluations of global image quality, MRI readability with respect to 12 anatomical structures and visibility through the penumbra were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After application of the O-MAR protocol, the radius of the signal void reduced from 50.76 mm to 45.43 mm and from 49.22 mm to 40.15 mm on T1w and T2w TSE axial sequences, respectively (p < 0.05). Qualitatively, sequences acquired with O-MAR produced better outcomes in terms of image quality and anatomical depiction. Despite the area of the penumbra being increased for the O-MAR protocol, visibility through penumbra was improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of O-MAR may provide a complementary strategy to those already in use to obtain diagnostically useful MRI examinations in the presence of a CI, especially in case of skull base diseases requiring MRI monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"273-282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/9d/aoi-2023-04-273.PMC10366562.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估人工耳蜗(CI)扫描应用“矫形-金属伪影还原”(O-MAR)算法时伪影大小和MRI可见性。方法:2名志愿者接受1.5 T MRI,头部放置Ultra 3D CI接收器刺激器。采用四种角度CI方向:90度、120度、135度和160度。在每一种情况下,对志愿者进行轴位和冠状面T1w和T2w TSE序列以及O-MAR序列扫描。对信号空洞和半影范围进行了定量比较。此外,还进行了总体图像质量、12个解剖结构的MRI可读性和半影可见性的定性评估。结果:应用O-MAR方案后,T1w和T2w的信号空洞半径分别从50.76 mm减小到45.43 mm和49.22 mm减小到40.15 mm (p < 0.05)。定性地说,用O-MAR获得的序列在图像质量和解剖描述方面产生了更好的结果。尽管O-MAR协议增加了半影的面积,但通过半影的可见性得到了提高。结论:O-MAR的应用可以为已经使用的在CI存在时获得诊断有用的MRI检查提供补充策略,特别是在需要MRI监测的颅底疾病的情况下。
The usefulness of the O-MAR algorithm in MRI skull base assessment to manage cochlear implant-related artifacts.
Objective: To assess artifact size and MRI visibility when applying the "Orthopedic-Metal Artifact Reduction" (O-MAR) algorithm for cochlear implant (CI) scanning.
Methods: Two volunteers were submitted to 1.5 T MRI with an Ultra 3D CI receiver stimulator placed on their head. Four angular CI orientations were adopted: 90, 120, 135 and 160 degrees. Volunteers were scanned in each condition using T1w and T2w TSE sequences, as well as O-MAR sequences, in both axial and coronal planes. Quantitative comparisons were made of signal void and penumbra extent. Additionally, qualitative evaluations of global image quality, MRI readability with respect to 12 anatomical structures and visibility through the penumbra were undertaken.
Results: After application of the O-MAR protocol, the radius of the signal void reduced from 50.76 mm to 45.43 mm and from 49.22 mm to 40.15 mm on T1w and T2w TSE axial sequences, respectively (p < 0.05). Qualitatively, sequences acquired with O-MAR produced better outcomes in terms of image quality and anatomical depiction. Despite the area of the penumbra being increased for the O-MAR protocol, visibility through penumbra was improved.
Conclusions: Application of O-MAR may provide a complementary strategy to those already in use to obtain diagnostically useful MRI examinations in the presence of a CI, especially in case of skull base diseases requiring MRI monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini.
It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.).
The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief.
Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.