不同类型微种植体辅助腭快速扩张对骨骼和牙槽的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hyeong-Yoon Choi, Sang-Min Lee, Jin-Woo Lee, Dong-Hwa Chung, Mo-Hyeon Lee
{"title":"不同类型微种植体辅助腭快速扩张对骨骼和牙槽的影响。","authors":"Hyeong-Yoon Choi,&nbsp;Sang-Min Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Woo Lee,&nbsp;Dong-Hwa Chung,&nbsp;Mo-Hyeon Lee","doi":"10.4041/kjod23.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the following null hypothesis: the skeletal and dentoalveolar expansion patterns in the coronal and axial planes are not different with two different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pretreatment (T0) and post-MARPE (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 32 patients (14 males and 18 females; mean age, 19.37) were analyzed. We compared two different MARPE systems. One MARPE system included the maxillary first premolars, maxillary first molars, and four microimplants as anchors (U46 type, n = 16), while the other included only the maxillary first molars and microimplants as anchors (U6 type, n = 16).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the molar region of the U6 and U46 groups, the transverse expansion at the midnasal, basal, alveolar, and dental levels was 2.64, 3.52, 4.46, and 6.32 mm and 2.17, 2.56, 2.73, and 5.71 mm, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the posterior alveolar-level expansion (<i>p</i> = 0.036) and posterior basal-bone-level expansion (<i>p</i> = 0.043) between the groups, with greater posterior skeletal and alveolar expansion in the U6 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the U46 group, the U6 group showed greater posterior expansion at the alveolar and basal-bone levels, with an almost parallel split. Both groups showed a pyramidal expansion pattern in the coronal view.</p>","PeriodicalId":51260,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"53 4","pages":"241-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/0f/kjod-53-4-241.PMC10387429.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeong-Yoon Choi,&nbsp;Sang-Min Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Woo Lee,&nbsp;Dong-Hwa Chung,&nbsp;Mo-Hyeon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4041/kjod23.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the following null hypothesis: the skeletal and dentoalveolar expansion patterns in the coronal and axial planes are not different with two different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pretreatment (T0) and post-MARPE (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 32 patients (14 males and 18 females; mean age, 19.37) were analyzed. We compared two different MARPE systems. One MARPE system included the maxillary first premolars, maxillary first molars, and four microimplants as anchors (U46 type, n = 16), while the other included only the maxillary first molars and microimplants as anchors (U6 type, n = 16).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the molar region of the U6 and U46 groups, the transverse expansion at the midnasal, basal, alveolar, and dental levels was 2.64, 3.52, 4.46, and 6.32 mm and 2.17, 2.56, 2.73, and 5.71 mm, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the posterior alveolar-level expansion (<i>p</i> = 0.036) and posterior basal-bone-level expansion (<i>p</i> = 0.043) between the groups, with greater posterior skeletal and alveolar expansion in the U6 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the U46 group, the U6 group showed greater posterior expansion at the alveolar and basal-bone levels, with an almost parallel split. Both groups showed a pyramidal expansion pattern in the coronal view.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"241-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/0f/kjod-53-4-241.PMC10387429.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod23.036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod23.036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:验证两种不同类型的微种植体辅助腭快速扩张(MARPE)系统在冠状面和轴向面的骨骼和牙槽骨扩张模式没有差异的零假设。方法:对32例患者(男14例,女18例)进行预处理(T0)和marpe后(T1) ct扫描(CBCT);平均年龄19.37岁)。我们比较了两种不同的MARPE系统。一种MARPE系统包括上颌第一前磨牙、上颌第一磨牙和4颗微种植体作为锚定体(U46型,n = 16),另一种MARPE系统仅包括上颌第一磨牙和微种植体作为锚定体(U6型,n = 16)。结果:U6组和U46组磨牙区在鼻中、基牙、牙槽和牙面水平的横向扩张分别为2.64、3.52、4.46、6.32 mm和2.17、2.56、2.73、5.71 mm。两组间后牙槽水平扩张(p = 0.036)和后基底骨水平扩张(p = 0.043)差异有统计学意义,U6组后骨和牙槽水平扩张较大。结论:与U46组相比,U6组在牙槽骨和基底骨水平表现出更大的后部扩张,几乎平行裂开。两组冠状面均呈锥体状扩张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

Objective: To evaluate the following null hypothesis: the skeletal and dentoalveolar expansion patterns in the coronal and axial planes are not different with two different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) systems.

Methods: Pretreatment (T0) and post-MARPE (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 32 patients (14 males and 18 females; mean age, 19.37) were analyzed. We compared two different MARPE systems. One MARPE system included the maxillary first premolars, maxillary first molars, and four microimplants as anchors (U46 type, n = 16), while the other included only the maxillary first molars and microimplants as anchors (U6 type, n = 16).

Results: In the molar region of the U6 and U46 groups, the transverse expansion at the midnasal, basal, alveolar, and dental levels was 2.64, 3.52, 4.46, and 6.32 mm and 2.17, 2.56, 2.73, and 5.71 mm, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the posterior alveolar-level expansion (p = 0.036) and posterior basal-bone-level expansion (p = 0.043) between the groups, with greater posterior skeletal and alveolar expansion in the U6 group.

Conclusions: Compared with the U46 group, the U6 group showed greater posterior expansion at the alveolar and basal-bone levels, with an almost parallel split. Both groups showed a pyramidal expansion pattern in the coronal view.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Korean Journal of Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Orthodontics (KJO) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal published in January, March, May, July, September, and November each year. It was first launched in 1970 and, as the official scientific publication of Korean Association of Orthodontists, KJO aims to publish high quality clinical and scientific original research papers in all areas related to orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Specifically, its interest focuses on evidence-based investigations of contemporary diagnostic procedures and treatment techniques, expanding to significant clinical reports of diverse treatment approaches. The scope of KJO covers all areas of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics including successful diagnostic procedures and treatment planning, growth and development of the face and its clinical implications, appliance designs, biomechanics, TMJ disorders and adult treatment. Specifically, its latest interest focuses on skeletal anchorage devices, orthodontic appliance and biomaterials, 3 dimensional imaging techniques utilized for dentofacial diagnosis and treatment planning, and orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal disharmony in association of orthodontic treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信