Pimavanserin和其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗帕金森病精神病的疗效、安全性和可接受性比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ismaeel Yunusa, Nazia Rashid, Roxanna Seyedin, Deepika Paratane, Krithika Rajagopalan
{"title":"Pimavanserin和其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗帕金森病精神病的疗效、安全性和可接受性比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Ismaeel Yunusa,&nbsp;Nazia Rashid,&nbsp;Roxanna Seyedin,&nbsp;Deepika Paratane,&nbsp;Krithika Rajagopalan","doi":"10.1177/08919887231154933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) in treating Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP) are not entirely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of AAPs in patients with PDP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of pimavanserin, quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, and risperidone. We estimated relative standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 19 unique studies evaluating AAPs in a total of 1,242 persons with PDP. Based on Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity, pimavanserin (SMD, -4.81; 95% CI, -5.39, -4.24) and clozapine (SMD, -4.25; 95% CI, -5.24, -3.26) significantly improved symptoms compared with placebo. Also, compared to placebo, pimavanserin (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07, 1.24) significantly improved psychotic symptoms based on Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis/Hallucinations and Delusions scores. In comparison to placebo, clozapine (SMD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.35, -0.02), pimavanserin (SMD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.56, 0.53), and quetiapine (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.68, 0.69) did not impair motor function per Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale. Based on Mini-Mental State Examination scale, quetiapine (SMD, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.07, 1.14) significantly impaired cognition compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with PDP, pimavanserin and clozapine demonstrated significant improvement in psychosis without affecting motor function. With quetiapine being associated with a significant decline in cognition and despite not impairing motor function, our findings suggest that it should be avoided in patients with PDP and reduced cognitive abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":"36 5","pages":"417-432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Pimavanserin and Other Atypical Antipsychotics for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ismaeel Yunusa,&nbsp;Nazia Rashid,&nbsp;Roxanna Seyedin,&nbsp;Deepika Paratane,&nbsp;Krithika Rajagopalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08919887231154933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) in treating Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP) are not entirely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of AAPs in patients with PDP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of pimavanserin, quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, and risperidone. We estimated relative standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 19 unique studies evaluating AAPs in a total of 1,242 persons with PDP. Based on Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity, pimavanserin (SMD, -4.81; 95% CI, -5.39, -4.24) and clozapine (SMD, -4.25; 95% CI, -5.24, -3.26) significantly improved symptoms compared with placebo. Also, compared to placebo, pimavanserin (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07, 1.24) significantly improved psychotic symptoms based on Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis/Hallucinations and Delusions scores. In comparison to placebo, clozapine (SMD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.35, -0.02), pimavanserin (SMD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.56, 0.53), and quetiapine (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.68, 0.69) did not impair motor function per Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale. Based on Mini-Mental State Examination scale, quetiapine (SMD, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.07, 1.14) significantly impaired cognition compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with PDP, pimavanserin and clozapine demonstrated significant improvement in psychosis without affecting motor function. With quetiapine being associated with a significant decline in cognition and despite not impairing motor function, our findings suggest that it should be avoided in patients with PDP and reduced cognitive abilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"417-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231154933\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231154933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:目前非典型抗精神病药物(AAP)治疗帕金森病精神病(PDP)的比较疗效、安全性和可接受性尚不完全清楚。目的:评价AAP在PDP患者中的比较疗效、安全性和可接受性。方法:我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析,以比较匹马万塞林、喹硫平、奥氮平、氯氮平、齐拉西酮和利培酮的疗效、安全性和可接受性。我们估计了连续结果的相对标准化平均差(SMD)和二元结果的比值比(OR),以及它们各自的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:我们纳入了19项独特的研究,评估了1242名PDP患者的AAP。根据严重程度的临床总体印象量表,与安慰剂相比,匹马万塞林(SMD,-4.81;95%CI,-5.39,-4.24)和氯氮平(SMD、-4.25;95%CI、-5.24,-3.26)显著改善了症状。此外,与安慰剂相比,根据帕金森病精神病/幻觉和妄想阳性症状评估量表评分,匹马万塞林(OR,1.16;95%CI,1.07,1.24)显著改善了精神病症状。与安慰剂相比,氯氮平(SMD,-0.69;95%置信区间,-1.35,-0.02)、匹马万塞林(SMD;-0.01;95%CI,-0.56,0.53)和喹硫平(SMD:0.00;95%CI:-0.68,0.69)不损害帕金森病统一评定量表中的运动功能。根据迷你精神状态检查量表,与安慰剂相比,喹硫平(SMD,0.60;95%CI,0.071.14)显著损害了认知。结论:在PDP患者中,匹马万塞林和氯氮平在不影响运动功能的情况下对精神病有显著改善。喹硫平与认知能力显著下降有关,尽管不会损害运动功能,但我们的研究结果表明,PDP和认知能力下降的患者应避免使用喹硫平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Pimavanserin and Other Atypical Antipsychotics for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Background: The current comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) in treating Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP) are not entirely understood.

Objective: To evaluate comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of AAPs in patients with PDP.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of pimavanserin, quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, and risperidone. We estimated relative standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: We included 19 unique studies evaluating AAPs in a total of 1,242 persons with PDP. Based on Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity, pimavanserin (SMD, -4.81; 95% CI, -5.39, -4.24) and clozapine (SMD, -4.25; 95% CI, -5.24, -3.26) significantly improved symptoms compared with placebo. Also, compared to placebo, pimavanserin (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07, 1.24) significantly improved psychotic symptoms based on Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis/Hallucinations and Delusions scores. In comparison to placebo, clozapine (SMD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.35, -0.02), pimavanserin (SMD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.56, 0.53), and quetiapine (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.68, 0.69) did not impair motor function per Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale. Based on Mini-Mental State Examination scale, quetiapine (SMD, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.07, 1.14) significantly impaired cognition compared to placebo.

Conclusions: In patients with PDP, pimavanserin and clozapine demonstrated significant improvement in psychosis without affecting motor function. With quetiapine being associated with a significant decline in cognition and despite not impairing motor function, our findings suggest that it should be avoided in patients with PDP and reduced cognitive abilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信