跨栏高度对男子运动员跨栏时下肢关节运动学和动力学的影响。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sports Biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1080/14763141.2023.2241852
Keitaro Seki, Shingo Hondo
{"title":"跨栏高度对男子运动员跨栏时下肢关节运动学和动力学的影响。","authors":"Keitaro Seki, Shingo Hondo","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2023.2241852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hurdle jumps are frequently practiced in the field of sports training. The present study aimed to clarify the effect of hurdle heights on jumping height and joint kinematics, and kinetics during hurdle jumps. Ten male Japanese trainee sprinters performed at three heights (0.76, 0.91 and 1.06 m) of hurdle jumps and maximum countermovement jump (CMJ). Sagittal plane kinematics and ground reaction force were measured. Jump height significantly increased with hurdle heights (<i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.65), but the difference in jump heights was small as compared to the difference in the hurdle heights. The contact time and mechanical work of the lower limb joints did not differ between different hurdle heights. The minimal angles of the knee (<i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup> <i> = 0.47</i>) and hip (<i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup> <i> = 0.70</i>) joints during the flight phase significantly decreased with higher hurdle heights. The load characteristics of the lower limb joint with higher hurdle heights would be similar to those with lower hurdle heights. In higher hurdle heights, since the increase in jump height was smaller than the increase in hurdle height, the legs were more flexed to clear the hurdle. Therefore, the hurdle height which is similar to the maximum CMJ height would be appropriate as a training load.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"3131-3140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of hurdle height on lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics of male trainee sprinters during hurdle jumps.\",\"authors\":\"Keitaro Seki, Shingo Hondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14763141.2023.2241852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hurdle jumps are frequently practiced in the field of sports training. The present study aimed to clarify the effect of hurdle heights on jumping height and joint kinematics, and kinetics during hurdle jumps. Ten male Japanese trainee sprinters performed at three heights (0.76, 0.91 and 1.06 m) of hurdle jumps and maximum countermovement jump (CMJ). Sagittal plane kinematics and ground reaction force were measured. Jump height significantly increased with hurdle heights (<i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.65), but the difference in jump heights was small as compared to the difference in the hurdle heights. The contact time and mechanical work of the lower limb joints did not differ between different hurdle heights. The minimal angles of the knee (<i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup> <i> = 0.47</i>) and hip (<i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup><i>2</i></sup> <i> = 0.70</i>) joints during the flight phase significantly decreased with higher hurdle heights. The load characteristics of the lower limb joint with higher hurdle heights would be similar to those with lower hurdle heights. In higher hurdle heights, since the increase in jump height was smaller than the increase in hurdle height, the legs were more flexed to clear the hurdle. Therefore, the hurdle height which is similar to the maximum CMJ height would be appropriate as a training load.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3131-3140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2241852\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2241852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨栏是体育训练中经常练习的项目。本研究旨在阐明跨栏高度对跳跃高度和跨栏运动中关节运动学和动力学的影响。10名日本男子短跑练习生在3个高度(0.76、0.91和1.06米)上进行了跨栏和最大反向跳跃(CMJ)。测量了矢状面运动学和地面反作用力。跳跃高度随跨栏高度的增加而显著增加(ηp2 = 0.65),但与跨栏高度的差异相比,跳跃高度的差异很小。不同跨栏高度的运动员下肢关节接触时间和机械功无显著差异。随着跨栏高度的增加,飞行阶段膝关节(ηp2 = 0.47)和髋关节(ηp2 = 0.70)的最小角度明显减小。跨栏高度较高时下肢关节的负荷特性与跨栏高度较低时相似。在跨栏高度较高的情况下,由于跳跃高度的增加小于跨栏高度的增加,因此腿的屈曲度更大。因此,与最大CMJ高度相似的跨栏高度作为训练负荷是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of hurdle height on lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics of male trainee sprinters during hurdle jumps.

Hurdle jumps are frequently practiced in the field of sports training. The present study aimed to clarify the effect of hurdle heights on jumping height and joint kinematics, and kinetics during hurdle jumps. Ten male Japanese trainee sprinters performed at three heights (0.76, 0.91 and 1.06 m) of hurdle jumps and maximum countermovement jump (CMJ). Sagittal plane kinematics and ground reaction force were measured. Jump height significantly increased with hurdle heights (ηp2 = 0.65), but the difference in jump heights was small as compared to the difference in the hurdle heights. The contact time and mechanical work of the lower limb joints did not differ between different hurdle heights. The minimal angles of the knee (ηp2  = 0.47) and hip (ηp2  = 0.70) joints during the flight phase significantly decreased with higher hurdle heights. The load characteristics of the lower limb joint with higher hurdle heights would be similar to those with lower hurdle heights. In higher hurdle heights, since the increase in jump height was smaller than the increase in hurdle height, the legs were more flexed to clear the hurdle. Therefore, the hurdle height which is similar to the maximum CMJ height would be appropriate as a training load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic). Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly. Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信