美国握力不对称的流行率和趋势。

Advances in geriatric medicine and research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-25 DOI:10.20900/agmr20230006
Ryan McGrath, Justin J Lang, Brian C Clark, Peggy M Cawthon, Kennedy Black, Jacob Kieser, Brooklyn J Fraser, Grant R Tomkinson
{"title":"美国握力不对称的流行率和趋势。","authors":"Ryan McGrath,&nbsp;Justin J Lang,&nbsp;Brian C Clark,&nbsp;Peggy M Cawthon,&nbsp;Kennedy Black,&nbsp;Jacob Kieser,&nbsp;Brooklyn J Fraser,&nbsp;Grant R Tomkinson","doi":"10.20900/agmr20230006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strength asymmetries are a type of muscle function impairment that is associated with several health conditions. However, the prevalence of these asymmetries among adults from the United States remains unknown. We sought to estimate the prevalence and trends of handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry in American adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The unweighted analytic sample included 23,056 persons aged at least 50-years with information on HGS for both hands from the 2006-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. A handgrip dynamometer measured HGS, with the highest recorded values for each hand used to calculate asymmetry. Persons were categorized into the following asymmetry severity categories: (1) >10%, (2) >20.0%, and (3) >30.0%. Survey weights were used to generate nationally-representative asymmetry estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there were no statistically significant trends in HGS asymmetry categories over time. The prevalence of HGS asymmetry in the 2014-2016 wave was 53.4% (CI: 52.2-54.4), 26.0% (CI: 25.0-26.9), and 11.7% (CI: 10.9-12.3) for asymmetry at >10%, >20%, and >30%, respectively. HGS asymmetry was generally higher in older Americans compared to middle-aged adults at each wave. In the 2014-2016 wave, >30% asymmetry prevalence was 13.7% (CI: 12.7-14.6) in females and 9.3% (CI: 8.4-10.2) in males. Some differences in asymmetry prevalence by race and ethnicity were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of asymmetry was generally high, especially in women and older adults. Ongoing surveillance of strength asymmetry will help monitor trends in muscle dysfunction, guide screening for disablement, identify subpopulations at risk for asymmetry, and inform relevant interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72094,"journal":{"name":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Trends of Handgrip Strength Asymmetry in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan McGrath,&nbsp;Justin J Lang,&nbsp;Brian C Clark,&nbsp;Peggy M Cawthon,&nbsp;Kennedy Black,&nbsp;Jacob Kieser,&nbsp;Brooklyn J Fraser,&nbsp;Grant R Tomkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.20900/agmr20230006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strength asymmetries are a type of muscle function impairment that is associated with several health conditions. However, the prevalence of these asymmetries among adults from the United States remains unknown. We sought to estimate the prevalence and trends of handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry in American adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The unweighted analytic sample included 23,056 persons aged at least 50-years with information on HGS for both hands from the 2006-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. A handgrip dynamometer measured HGS, with the highest recorded values for each hand used to calculate asymmetry. Persons were categorized into the following asymmetry severity categories: (1) >10%, (2) >20.0%, and (3) >30.0%. Survey weights were used to generate nationally-representative asymmetry estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there were no statistically significant trends in HGS asymmetry categories over time. The prevalence of HGS asymmetry in the 2014-2016 wave was 53.4% (CI: 52.2-54.4), 26.0% (CI: 25.0-26.9), and 11.7% (CI: 10.9-12.3) for asymmetry at >10%, >20%, and >30%, respectively. HGS asymmetry was generally higher in older Americans compared to middle-aged adults at each wave. In the 2014-2016 wave, >30% asymmetry prevalence was 13.7% (CI: 12.7-14.6) in females and 9.3% (CI: 8.4-10.2) in males. Some differences in asymmetry prevalence by race and ethnicity were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of asymmetry was generally high, especially in women and older adults. Ongoing surveillance of strength asymmetry will help monitor trends in muscle dysfunction, guide screening for disablement, identify subpopulations at risk for asymmetry, and inform relevant interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in geriatric medicine and research\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in geriatric medicine and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20230006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in geriatric medicine and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20230006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:力量不对称是一种与多种健康状况相关的肌肉功能损伤。然而,这些不对称现象在美国成年人中的普遍性仍然未知。我们试图估计美国成年人握力不对称的患病率和趋势。方法:未加权分析样本包括23056名年龄在50岁以上的人,他们的双手都有2006-2016年健康与退休研究浪潮中的HGS信息。手柄测力计测量HGS,每只手的最高记录值用于计算不对称性。人们被分为以下不对称严重程度类别:(1)>10%,(2)>2.0%,和(3)>30.0%。调查权重用于生成具有全国代表性的不对称估计值。结果:总体而言,随着时间的推移,HGS不对称类别没有统计学上显著的趋势。2014-2016年,HGS不对称的发生率分别为53.4%(CI:52.2-54.4)、26.0%(CI:25.0-26.9)和11.7%(CI:10.9-12.3),不对称率分别为>10%、>20%和>30%。在每一波中,美国老年人的HGS不对称性通常高于中年人。在2014-2016年的浪潮中,>30%的不对称患病率女性为13.7%(CI:12.7-14.6),男性为9.3%(CI:8.4-10.2)。观察到不同种族和民族的不对称患病率存在一些差异。结论:不对称的患病率普遍较高,尤其是在女性和老年人中。持续监测力量不对称将有助于监测肌肉功能障碍的趋势,指导残疾筛查,识别有不对称风险的亚群,并为相关干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevalence and Trends of Handgrip Strength Asymmetry in the United States.

Prevalence and Trends of Handgrip Strength Asymmetry in the United States.

Background: Strength asymmetries are a type of muscle function impairment that is associated with several health conditions. However, the prevalence of these asymmetries among adults from the United States remains unknown. We sought to estimate the prevalence and trends of handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry in American adults.

Methods: The unweighted analytic sample included 23,056 persons aged at least 50-years with information on HGS for both hands from the 2006-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. A handgrip dynamometer measured HGS, with the highest recorded values for each hand used to calculate asymmetry. Persons were categorized into the following asymmetry severity categories: (1) >10%, (2) >20.0%, and (3) >30.0%. Survey weights were used to generate nationally-representative asymmetry estimates.

Results: Overall, there were no statistically significant trends in HGS asymmetry categories over time. The prevalence of HGS asymmetry in the 2014-2016 wave was 53.4% (CI: 52.2-54.4), 26.0% (CI: 25.0-26.9), and 11.7% (CI: 10.9-12.3) for asymmetry at >10%, >20%, and >30%, respectively. HGS asymmetry was generally higher in older Americans compared to middle-aged adults at each wave. In the 2014-2016 wave, >30% asymmetry prevalence was 13.7% (CI: 12.7-14.6) in females and 9.3% (CI: 8.4-10.2) in males. Some differences in asymmetry prevalence by race and ethnicity were observed.

Conclusions: The prevalence of asymmetry was generally high, especially in women and older adults. Ongoing surveillance of strength asymmetry will help monitor trends in muscle dysfunction, guide screening for disablement, identify subpopulations at risk for asymmetry, and inform relevant interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信