免疫血液学检测在母婴ABO血型不合中的意义。

Q4 Medicine
J Novoselac, K Buzina Marić, V Rimac, I Selak, M Raos, B Golubić Ćepulić
{"title":"免疫血液学检测在母婴ABO血型不合中的意义。","authors":"J Novoselac,&nbsp;K Buzina Marić,&nbsp;V Rimac,&nbsp;I Selak,&nbsp;M Raos,&nbsp;B Golubić Ćepulić","doi":"10.21307/immunohematology-2023-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to define risk factors for jaundice and anemia in newborns with a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and/or with an incompatible crossmatch due to ABO incompatibility between mother and newborn. ABO incompatibility has become a more significant cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn since the introduction of effective anti-D prophylaxis. The condition is common and, if clinically significant at all, causes only mild jaundice, which can be treated with phototherapy (PT). However, rare and serious presentations, requiring transfusion therapy, have been noted. Clinical, laboratory, and immunohematologic data were collected retrospectively from medical records of ABO-incompatible newborns and their mothers over a 5-year period (2016-2020) from University Hospital Centre Zagreb. Two groups of newborns were compared: those who needed medical intervention because of hyperbilirubinemia or anemia and those who did not. Within the group of newborns requiring intervention, we also compared those with A and B blood groups. Over the 5-year period, 72 of 184 (39%) newborns required treatment. The treatment was PT in 71 (38%) newborns and erythrocyte transfusion in 2 (1%). In 112 (61%) newborns, ABO incompatibility was an accidental finding while performing blood group typing; these newborns did not require any therapy. In conclusion, we found a statistical, but not clinically significant, difference between the groups of treated and untreated newborns, related to the mode of delivery and DAT positivity within hours of delivery. There were no statistically significant differences in characteristics between the groups of treated newborns, except for two newborns with blood group A who received erythrocyte transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"39 2","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of immunohematologic testing in mother and newborn ABO incompatibility.\",\"authors\":\"J Novoselac,&nbsp;K Buzina Marić,&nbsp;V Rimac,&nbsp;I Selak,&nbsp;M Raos,&nbsp;B Golubić Ćepulić\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/immunohematology-2023-009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to define risk factors for jaundice and anemia in newborns with a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and/or with an incompatible crossmatch due to ABO incompatibility between mother and newborn. ABO incompatibility has become a more significant cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn since the introduction of effective anti-D prophylaxis. The condition is common and, if clinically significant at all, causes only mild jaundice, which can be treated with phototherapy (PT). However, rare and serious presentations, requiring transfusion therapy, have been noted. Clinical, laboratory, and immunohematologic data were collected retrospectively from medical records of ABO-incompatible newborns and their mothers over a 5-year period (2016-2020) from University Hospital Centre Zagreb. Two groups of newborns were compared: those who needed medical intervention because of hyperbilirubinemia or anemia and those who did not. Within the group of newborns requiring intervention, we also compared those with A and B blood groups. Over the 5-year period, 72 of 184 (39%) newborns required treatment. The treatment was PT in 71 (38%) newborns and erythrocyte transfusion in 2 (1%). In 112 (61%) newborns, ABO incompatibility was an accidental finding while performing blood group typing; these newborns did not require any therapy. In conclusion, we found a statistical, but not clinically significant, difference between the groups of treated and untreated newborns, related to the mode of delivery and DAT positivity within hours of delivery. There were no statistically significant differences in characteristics between the groups of treated newborns, except for two newborns with blood group A who received erythrocyte transfusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunohematology\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"55-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunohematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2023-009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2023-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定新生儿黄疸和贫血的危险因素,直接抗球蛋白试验(DAT)阳性和/或由于母亲和新生儿ABO不相容而不相容的交叉配型。自从引入有效的抗- d预防以来,ABO不相容已成为胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病的一个更重要的原因。这种情况很常见,如果有临床意义,只会引起轻微的黄疸,可以用光疗(PT)治疗。然而,罕见和严重的表现,需要输血治疗,已被注意到。回顾性收集萨格勒布大学医院中心5年(2016-2020年)abo血型不相容新生儿及其母亲的医疗记录中的临床、实验室和免疫血液学数据。对两组新生儿进行比较:一组因高胆红素血症或贫血而需要医疗干预,另一组不需要。在需要干预的新生儿组中,我们也比较了A和B血型的新生儿。在5年期间,184名新生儿中有72名(39%)需要治疗。71例(38%)新生儿采用PT治疗,2例(1%)新生儿采用红细胞输注。在112例(61%)新生儿中,ABO血型不合是在进行血型分型时意外发现的;这些新生儿不需要任何治疗。总之,我们发现治疗组和未治疗组新生儿在分娩方式和分娩后数小时内DAT阳性方面有统计学差异,但无临床意义。除两名A血型新生儿接受红细胞输注外,两组新生儿的特征无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Significance of immunohematologic testing in mother and newborn ABO incompatibility.

The aim of this study was to define risk factors for jaundice and anemia in newborns with a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and/or with an incompatible crossmatch due to ABO incompatibility between mother and newborn. ABO incompatibility has become a more significant cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn since the introduction of effective anti-D prophylaxis. The condition is common and, if clinically significant at all, causes only mild jaundice, which can be treated with phototherapy (PT). However, rare and serious presentations, requiring transfusion therapy, have been noted. Clinical, laboratory, and immunohematologic data were collected retrospectively from medical records of ABO-incompatible newborns and their mothers over a 5-year period (2016-2020) from University Hospital Centre Zagreb. Two groups of newborns were compared: those who needed medical intervention because of hyperbilirubinemia or anemia and those who did not. Within the group of newborns requiring intervention, we also compared those with A and B blood groups. Over the 5-year period, 72 of 184 (39%) newborns required treatment. The treatment was PT in 71 (38%) newborns and erythrocyte transfusion in 2 (1%). In 112 (61%) newborns, ABO incompatibility was an accidental finding while performing blood group typing; these newborns did not require any therapy. In conclusion, we found a statistical, but not clinically significant, difference between the groups of treated and untreated newborns, related to the mode of delivery and DAT positivity within hours of delivery. There were no statistically significant differences in characteristics between the groups of treated newborns, except for two newborns with blood group A who received erythrocyte transfusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信