急诊科肾绞痛评估与处理临床实践指南的实施。

Cecile T Pham, Nicholas Hui, Regine Yan, Emma Richardson, Salonee Phanse, Jordan E Cohen, George McClintock, Ahilan Parameswaran, Matthew Smith, Andrew Mitterdorfer, John Boulas, Paul Gassner, Dinesh Patel, Paul Sved
{"title":"急诊科肾绞痛评估与处理临床实践指南的实施。","authors":"Cecile T Pham, Nicholas Hui, Regine Yan, Emma Richardson, Salonee Phanse, Jordan E Cohen, George McClintock, Ahilan Parameswaran, Matthew Smith, Andrew Mitterdorfer, John Boulas, Paul Gassner, Dinesh Patel, Paul Sved","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nRenal colic is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. Variations in assessment and management of suspected renal colic may have significant implications on patient and hospital outcomes. We developed a clinical practice guideline to standardize the assessment and management of renal colic in the ED. We subsequently compared outcomes before and after guideline implementation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe guidelines standardized the analgesia regimen, urology consult criteria, imaging modality, patient education, and followup instructions. This is a single-center, observational cohort study of patients presenting to the ED with renal colic prospectively collected after guideline implementation (December 2018 to May 2019), compared to a control group retrospectively collected before guideline implementation (December 2017 to May 2018). A total of 528 patients (pre-guideline n=283, post-guideline n=245) were included. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS using multivariate linear regression.\n\n\nRESULTS\nED length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter after guideline implementation (preguideline 295.82±178.8 minutes vs. post-guideline 253.2±118.2 minutes, p=0.017). The number of computed tomography (CT) scans patients received was significantly less after guideline implementation (pre guideline 1.35±1.34 vs. post-guideline 1.00±0.68, p=0.034). Patients discharged for conservative management had a lower re-presentation rate in the post-guideline group (12.6%) than the pre-guideline group (17.2%); however, this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.18).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nImplementation of a clinical practice guideline for ureteric stones reduces the ED LOS and the total number of CT scan in patients who present with renal colic. Standardizing assessment and management of ureteric stones can potentially improve patient and hospital outcomes without compromising the quality of care.","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":"17 7","pages":"E176-E181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382218/pdf/cuaj-7-176.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for assessment and management of renal colic in the emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Cecile T Pham, Nicholas Hui, Regine Yan, Emma Richardson, Salonee Phanse, Jordan E Cohen, George McClintock, Ahilan Parameswaran, Matthew Smith, Andrew Mitterdorfer, John Boulas, Paul Gassner, Dinesh Patel, Paul Sved\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nRenal colic is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. Variations in assessment and management of suspected renal colic may have significant implications on patient and hospital outcomes. We developed a clinical practice guideline to standardize the assessment and management of renal colic in the ED. We subsequently compared outcomes before and after guideline implementation.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe guidelines standardized the analgesia regimen, urology consult criteria, imaging modality, patient education, and followup instructions. This is a single-center, observational cohort study of patients presenting to the ED with renal colic prospectively collected after guideline implementation (December 2018 to May 2019), compared to a control group retrospectively collected before guideline implementation (December 2017 to May 2018). A total of 528 patients (pre-guideline n=283, post-guideline n=245) were included. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS using multivariate linear regression.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nED length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter after guideline implementation (preguideline 295.82±178.8 minutes vs. post-guideline 253.2±118.2 minutes, p=0.017). The number of computed tomography (CT) scans patients received was significantly less after guideline implementation (pre guideline 1.35±1.34 vs. post-guideline 1.00±0.68, p=0.034). Patients discharged for conservative management had a lower re-presentation rate in the post-guideline group (12.6%) than the pre-guideline group (17.2%); however, this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.18).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nImplementation of a clinical practice guideline for ureteric stones reduces the ED LOS and the total number of CT scan in patients who present with renal colic. Standardizing assessment and management of ureteric stones can potentially improve patient and hospital outcomes without compromising the quality of care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"E176-E181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382218/pdf/cuaj-7-176.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肾绞痛是一种常见的急诊科表现。评估和处理疑似肾绞痛的差异可能对患者和医院的预后有重大影响。我们制定了一项临床实践指南,以规范急诊科肾绞痛的评估和管理。我们随后比较了指南实施前后的结果。方法:该指南规范了镇痛方案、泌尿外科会诊标准、影像学方式、患者教育和随访指导。这是一项单中心、观察性队列研究,将指南实施后(2018年12月至2019年5月)前瞻性收集的肾绞痛患者与指南实施前(2017年12月至2018年5月)回顾性收集的对照组进行比较。共纳入528例患者(指南前n=283,指南后n=245)。采用SPSS多元线性回归进行统计学分析。结果:实施指南后ED停留时间(LOS)明显缩短(指南前295.82±178.8分钟vs指南后253.2±118.2分钟,p=0.017)。实施指南后,患者接受计算机断层扫描(CT)的次数显著减少(指南前1.35±1.34次vs指南后1.00±0.68次,p=0.034)。出院后接受保守治疗的患者,指南后组的再就诊率(12.6%)低于指南前组(17.2%);然而,这没有达到统计学意义(p=0.18)。结论:输尿管结石临床实践指南的实施减少了肾绞痛患者ED LOS和CT扫描的总次数。输尿管结石的标准化评估和管理可以在不影响护理质量的情况下潜在地改善患者和医院的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for assessment and management of renal colic in the emergency department.
INTRODUCTION Renal colic is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. Variations in assessment and management of suspected renal colic may have significant implications on patient and hospital outcomes. We developed a clinical practice guideline to standardize the assessment and management of renal colic in the ED. We subsequently compared outcomes before and after guideline implementation. METHODS The guidelines standardized the analgesia regimen, urology consult criteria, imaging modality, patient education, and followup instructions. This is a single-center, observational cohort study of patients presenting to the ED with renal colic prospectively collected after guideline implementation (December 2018 to May 2019), compared to a control group retrospectively collected before guideline implementation (December 2017 to May 2018). A total of 528 patients (pre-guideline n=283, post-guideline n=245) were included. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS ED length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter after guideline implementation (preguideline 295.82±178.8 minutes vs. post-guideline 253.2±118.2 minutes, p=0.017). The number of computed tomography (CT) scans patients received was significantly less after guideline implementation (pre guideline 1.35±1.34 vs. post-guideline 1.00±0.68, p=0.034). Patients discharged for conservative management had a lower re-presentation rate in the post-guideline group (12.6%) than the pre-guideline group (17.2%); however, this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for ureteric stones reduces the ED LOS and the total number of CT scan in patients who present with renal colic. Standardizing assessment and management of ureteric stones can potentially improve patient and hospital outcomes without compromising the quality of care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信