通往准确和通用应变测量之路:来自验证研究的见解。

Q2 Medicine
Goo-Yeong Cho
{"title":"通往准确和通用应变测量之路:来自验证研究的见解。","authors":"Goo-Yeong Cho","doi":"10.4250/jcvi.2023.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"https://e-jcvi.org While myocardial strain measurement is not currently considered a mandatory assessment in the guidelines of various cardiac disease, unlike left ventricular ejection fraction, it is a topic of active research among many investigators due to its potential clinical utility.1) The results of these studies have been promising, suggesting that myocardial strain measurement could become a necessary assessment in the near future. However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed before myocardial strain can be widely used in routine clinical practice. One of the main issues is that strain values can vary depending on the software used for measurement, and there is currently no standardization method for correcting these differences. As a result, it can be difficult to compare strain values obtained using different software programs, which can limit the utility of strain measurements in clinical decision-making. As such, the validation of strain measurement software is a critical step in establishing the reliability and accuracy of this tool. As these developments continue, it is likely that myocardial strain measurement will become an increasingly important tool for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of cardiac disease.","PeriodicalId":15229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"31 3","pages":"142-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/95/jcvi-31-142.PMC10374385.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Path to Accurate and Universal Strain Measurement: Insights From a Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Goo-Yeong Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.4250/jcvi.2023.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"https://e-jcvi.org While myocardial strain measurement is not currently considered a mandatory assessment in the guidelines of various cardiac disease, unlike left ventricular ejection fraction, it is a topic of active research among many investigators due to its potential clinical utility.1) The results of these studies have been promising, suggesting that myocardial strain measurement could become a necessary assessment in the near future. However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed before myocardial strain can be widely used in routine clinical practice. One of the main issues is that strain values can vary depending on the software used for measurement, and there is currently no standardization method for correcting these differences. As a result, it can be difficult to compare strain values obtained using different software programs, which can limit the utility of strain measurements in clinical decision-making. As such, the validation of strain measurement software is a critical step in establishing the reliability and accuracy of this tool. As these developments continue, it is likely that myocardial strain measurement will become an increasingly important tool for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of cardiac disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"142-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/95/jcvi-31-142.PMC10374385.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2023.0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2023.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Path to Accurate and Universal Strain Measurement: Insights From a Validation Study.
https://e-jcvi.org While myocardial strain measurement is not currently considered a mandatory assessment in the guidelines of various cardiac disease, unlike left ventricular ejection fraction, it is a topic of active research among many investigators due to its potential clinical utility.1) The results of these studies have been promising, suggesting that myocardial strain measurement could become a necessary assessment in the near future. However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed before myocardial strain can be widely used in routine clinical practice. One of the main issues is that strain values can vary depending on the software used for measurement, and there is currently no standardization method for correcting these differences. As a result, it can be difficult to compare strain values obtained using different software programs, which can limit the utility of strain measurements in clinical decision-making. As such, the validation of strain measurement software is a critical step in establishing the reliability and accuracy of this tool. As these developments continue, it is likely that myocardial strain measurement will become an increasingly important tool for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of cardiac disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信