Andrey Markus , David Manor , Daffy Konis , Zohar Eviatar
{"title":"视觉信息的半球间转移:意义和反应形成","authors":"Andrey Markus , David Manor , Daffy Konis , Zohar Eviatar","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examined whether Redundancy Gain (RG) can be dissociated from the response stage of a go/nogo paradigm, and whether the meaningfulness of a stimulus modulates the stage at which interhemispheric transfer occurs. Experiment 1 used a lateralized match-to-category paradigm, taken from categories with varying meaningfulness. Experiment 2 presented a novel design, which separates the perceptual stage from response formation, in examination of RG. A sequence of two stimuli was presented. Participants responded by matching the category of the second stimulus to that of the first. The redundant stimulus could appear at the first or the second stage, thus redundancy gain could be separated from the response. Experiment 1 revealed that redundancy gain occurs earlier in the process of stimulus identification for highly meaningful stimuli than for less meaningful stimuli. The results of Experiment 2 support the hypothesis that redundancy gain results from interhemispheric integration of perceptual information, rather than response-formation. Results from both experiments suggest that redundancy gain arises from interhemispheric integration in the perceptual stage, and the efficiency of this integration depends on the meaningfulness of the stimulus. These results are relevant to current hypotheses about the physiological mechanisms underlying RG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 106003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interhemispheric transfer of visual information: Meaningfulness and response formation\",\"authors\":\"Andrey Markus , David Manor , Daffy Konis , Zohar Eviatar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We examined whether Redundancy Gain (RG) can be dissociated from the response stage of a go/nogo paradigm, and whether the meaningfulness of a stimulus modulates the stage at which interhemispheric transfer occurs. Experiment 1 used a lateralized match-to-category paradigm, taken from categories with varying meaningfulness. Experiment 2 presented a novel design, which separates the perceptual stage from response formation, in examination of RG. A sequence of two stimuli was presented. Participants responded by matching the category of the second stimulus to that of the first. The redundant stimulus could appear at the first or the second stage, thus redundancy gain could be separated from the response. Experiment 1 revealed that redundancy gain occurs earlier in the process of stimulus identification for highly meaningful stimuli than for less meaningful stimuli. The results of Experiment 2 support the hypothesis that redundancy gain results from interhemispheric integration of perceptual information, rather than response-formation. Results from both experiments suggest that redundancy gain arises from interhemispheric integration in the perceptual stage, and the efficiency of this integration depends on the meaningfulness of the stimulus. These results are relevant to current hypotheses about the physiological mechanisms underlying RG.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027826262300060X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027826262300060X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interhemispheric transfer of visual information: Meaningfulness and response formation
We examined whether Redundancy Gain (RG) can be dissociated from the response stage of a go/nogo paradigm, and whether the meaningfulness of a stimulus modulates the stage at which interhemispheric transfer occurs. Experiment 1 used a lateralized match-to-category paradigm, taken from categories with varying meaningfulness. Experiment 2 presented a novel design, which separates the perceptual stage from response formation, in examination of RG. A sequence of two stimuli was presented. Participants responded by matching the category of the second stimulus to that of the first. The redundant stimulus could appear at the first or the second stage, thus redundancy gain could be separated from the response. Experiment 1 revealed that redundancy gain occurs earlier in the process of stimulus identification for highly meaningful stimuli than for less meaningful stimuli. The results of Experiment 2 support the hypothesis that redundancy gain results from interhemispheric integration of perceptual information, rather than response-formation. Results from both experiments suggest that redundancy gain arises from interhemispheric integration in the perceptual stage, and the efficiency of this integration depends on the meaningfulness of the stimulus. These results are relevant to current hypotheses about the physiological mechanisms underlying RG.
期刊介绍:
Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.