Ludovica Picchetta Ms.C. , Christian S. Ottolini Ph.D. , Helen C. O'Neill Ms.C., Ph.D. , Antonio Capalbo Ms.C., Ph.D.
{"title":"研究着床前胚胎节段性非整倍体的意义","authors":"Ludovica Picchetta Ms.C. , Christian S. Ottolini Ph.D. , Helen C. O'Neill Ms.C., Ph.D. , Antonio Capalbo Ms.C., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfss.2023.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Segmental aneuploidies<span> (SAs) are structural imbalances, namely, gains or losses, involving a chromosomal segment. Most preimplantation genetic testing platforms can detect segmental imbalances greater than 5–10 Mb, either full or mosaic; however, questions remain about clinical significance<span>. An in-depth review was performed to determine the accuracy, frequency, and types of SAs detected in preimplantation embryos<span><span>. A comprehensive search of the literature revealed an incidence of approximately 8.15% in preimplantation embryos, compared with a prevalence of 3.55% in prenatal diagnosis samples. Several studies have used rebiopsy analysis to validate the accuracy and reproducibility of such findings in blastocyst-stage embryos. A comparison of these studies yielded a mean confirmation rate of SAs slightly higher than 30%. This result could be attributed to their mitotic origin as well as to the technical limitations of preimplantation genetic testing. In addition, the few available studies in which embryos with a segmental finding were transferred in utero are analyzed to discuss the reproductive competence of such embryos. Except for 1 study, all outcomes were described for segmental embryos in a mosaic state. As a result, there is still insufficient evidence to provide accurate information about the effect of segmental imbalances on embryonic reproductive competence and to determine gestational and </span>newborn risks.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":73012,"journal":{"name":"F&S science","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 17-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the significance of segmental aneuploidy findings in preimplantation embryos\",\"authors\":\"Ludovica Picchetta Ms.C. , Christian S. Ottolini Ph.D. , Helen C. O'Neill Ms.C., Ph.D. , Antonio Capalbo Ms.C., Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfss.2023.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Segmental aneuploidies<span> (SAs) are structural imbalances, namely, gains or losses, involving a chromosomal segment. Most preimplantation genetic testing platforms can detect segmental imbalances greater than 5–10 Mb, either full or mosaic; however, questions remain about clinical significance<span>. An in-depth review was performed to determine the accuracy, frequency, and types of SAs detected in preimplantation embryos<span><span>. A comprehensive search of the literature revealed an incidence of approximately 8.15% in preimplantation embryos, compared with a prevalence of 3.55% in prenatal diagnosis samples. Several studies have used rebiopsy analysis to validate the accuracy and reproducibility of such findings in blastocyst-stage embryos. A comparison of these studies yielded a mean confirmation rate of SAs slightly higher than 30%. This result could be attributed to their mitotic origin as well as to the technical limitations of preimplantation genetic testing. In addition, the few available studies in which embryos with a segmental finding were transferred in utero are analyzed to discuss the reproductive competence of such embryos. Except for 1 study, all outcomes were described for segmental embryos in a mosaic state. As a result, there is still insufficient evidence to provide accurate information about the effect of segmental imbalances on embryonic reproductive competence and to determine gestational and </span>newborn risks.</span></span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F&S science\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 17-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F&S science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X23000150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X23000150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the significance of segmental aneuploidy findings in preimplantation embryos
Segmental aneuploidies (SAs) are structural imbalances, namely, gains or losses, involving a chromosomal segment. Most preimplantation genetic testing platforms can detect segmental imbalances greater than 5–10 Mb, either full or mosaic; however, questions remain about clinical significance. An in-depth review was performed to determine the accuracy, frequency, and types of SAs detected in preimplantation embryos. A comprehensive search of the literature revealed an incidence of approximately 8.15% in preimplantation embryos, compared with a prevalence of 3.55% in prenatal diagnosis samples. Several studies have used rebiopsy analysis to validate the accuracy and reproducibility of such findings in blastocyst-stage embryos. A comparison of these studies yielded a mean confirmation rate of SAs slightly higher than 30%. This result could be attributed to their mitotic origin as well as to the technical limitations of preimplantation genetic testing. In addition, the few available studies in which embryos with a segmental finding were transferred in utero are analyzed to discuss the reproductive competence of such embryos. Except for 1 study, all outcomes were described for segmental embryos in a mosaic state. As a result, there is still insufficient evidence to provide accurate information about the effect of segmental imbalances on embryonic reproductive competence and to determine gestational and newborn risks.