不同长度和压力梯度的分级压缩袜结合踝关节泵运动对股静脉血流速度的影响:一项初步研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Fan Yang, Dingyi Wang, Guohui Fan, Tingting Zhao, Wei Wang, Yaping Xu
{"title":"不同长度和压力梯度的分级压缩袜结合踝关节泵运动对股静脉血流速度的影响:一项初步研究。","authors":"Fan Yang,&nbsp;Dingyi Wang,&nbsp;Guohui Fan,&nbsp;Tingting Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Wang,&nbsp;Yaping Xu","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.23.04944-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graduated compression stocking (GCS) is one the most widely used intervention methods in decreasing venous stasis and preventing deep venous thrombosis in hospital patients. However, changes of femoral vein speed after using GCS, combining ankle pump movement or not, and the efficacy difference of GCS among brands are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center cross-sectional study, healthy participants were assigned to wear one of the three different GCSs (type A, B and C) on both legs. Type B was with lower compressions at popliteal fossa, middle thigh and upper thigh, compared with type A and C. Blood flow velocity of femoral veins was measured with a Doppler ultrasound scanner in the following four conditions: Lying, ankle pump movement, wearing GCS, and GCS combining ankle pump movement. The differences of femoral vein velocity between conditions in each GCS type, and differences of femoral vein velocity changes between GCS type B and type C were compared, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 participants enrolled and 6 wore type A, 10 wore type B and 10 wore type C GCS. Compared with lying, participants wearing type B GCS had significant higher left femoral vein peak velocity (PV<inf>L</inf>) and left femoral vein trough velocity (TV<inf>L</inf>) (absolute difference [AD] 10.63, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.17-18.09, P=0.0210; AD 8.65, 95% CI: 2.84-14.46, P=0.0171, respectively). Compared with ankle pump movement only, TV<inf>L</inf> significantly increased in participants wearing type B GCS and so did right femoral vein trough velocity (TV<inf>R</inf>) in in participants wearing type C GCS. Comparing with lying, the AD of PV<inf>L</inf> was significantly higher in participants wearing type B GCS than those wearing type C GCS (10.63±12.03 vs. -0.23±8.89, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GCS with lower compressions at popliteal fossa, middle thigh and upper thigh was related with higher femoral vein velocity. Femoral vein velocity of left leg increased much more than that of right leg in participants wearing GCS with/without ankle pump movement. Further investigations are needed to translate the herein reported hemodynamic effect of different compression dosages into a potentially different clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"42 3","pages":"239-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of graduated compression stockings of different length and pressure gradients combined with ankle pump movement on femoral vein blood velocity: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Yang,&nbsp;Dingyi Wang,&nbsp;Guohui Fan,&nbsp;Tingting Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Wang,&nbsp;Yaping Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.23.04944-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graduated compression stocking (GCS) is one the most widely used intervention methods in decreasing venous stasis and preventing deep venous thrombosis in hospital patients. However, changes of femoral vein speed after using GCS, combining ankle pump movement or not, and the efficacy difference of GCS among brands are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center cross-sectional study, healthy participants were assigned to wear one of the three different GCSs (type A, B and C) on both legs. Type B was with lower compressions at popliteal fossa, middle thigh and upper thigh, compared with type A and C. Blood flow velocity of femoral veins was measured with a Doppler ultrasound scanner in the following four conditions: Lying, ankle pump movement, wearing GCS, and GCS combining ankle pump movement. The differences of femoral vein velocity between conditions in each GCS type, and differences of femoral vein velocity changes between GCS type B and type C were compared, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 participants enrolled and 6 wore type A, 10 wore type B and 10 wore type C GCS. Compared with lying, participants wearing type B GCS had significant higher left femoral vein peak velocity (PV<inf>L</inf>) and left femoral vein trough velocity (TV<inf>L</inf>) (absolute difference [AD] 10.63, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.17-18.09, P=0.0210; AD 8.65, 95% CI: 2.84-14.46, P=0.0171, respectively). Compared with ankle pump movement only, TV<inf>L</inf> significantly increased in participants wearing type B GCS and so did right femoral vein trough velocity (TV<inf>R</inf>) in in participants wearing type C GCS. Comparing with lying, the AD of PV<inf>L</inf> was significantly higher in participants wearing type B GCS than those wearing type C GCS (10.63±12.03 vs. -0.23±8.89, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GCS with lower compressions at popliteal fossa, middle thigh and upper thigh was related with higher femoral vein velocity. Femoral vein velocity of left leg increased much more than that of right leg in participants wearing GCS with/without ankle pump movement. Further investigations are needed to translate the herein reported hemodynamic effect of different compression dosages into a potentially different clinical benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"239-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.23.04944-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.23.04944-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:渐进式加压长袜(GCS)是减少静脉淤积和预防住院患者深静脉血栓形成最广泛使用的干预方法之一。然而,使用GCS后股静脉速度的变化,是否结合踝泵运动,以及不同品牌GCS的疗效差异尚不清楚。方法:在这项单中心横断面研究中,健康参与者被分配在双腿上佩戴三种不同的gcs (A、B和C型)中的一种。B型与A型和c型相比,在腘窝、大腿中部和大腿上部有较低的压迫。在躺卧、踝关节泵运动、佩戴GCS、GCS联合踝关节泵运动四种情况下,用多普勒超声扫描仪测量股静脉血流速度。比较各GCS类型患者股静脉流速的差异,以及B型与C型GCS患者股静脉流速变化的差异。结果:共入组26人,其中A型6人,B型10人,C型10人。与躺着的受试者相比,佩戴B型GCS的受试者左股静脉峰值流速(PVL)和左股静脉谷流速(TVL)显著升高(绝对差值[AD] 10.63, 95%可信区间[95% CI] 3.17-18.09, P=0.0210;ad8.65, 95% CI: 2.84 ~ 14.46, P=0.0171)。与仅踝关节泵运动相比,佩戴B型GCS的参与者的TVL显著增加,而佩戴C型GCS的参与者的右股静脉流速(TVR)也显著增加。与躺卧者相比,佩戴B型GCS者PVL的AD显著高于佩戴C型GCS者(10.63±12.03 vs -0.23±8.89)。结论:腘窝、大腿中部和大腿上部低处压迫GCS与较高的股静脉流速相关。配戴GCS伴/不伴踝泵运动的受试者左腿股静脉流速明显高于右腿。需要进一步的研究将本文报道的不同压缩剂量的血流动力学效应转化为潜在的不同临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comparison of graduated compression stockings of different length and pressure gradients combined with ankle pump movement on femoral vein blood velocity: a pilot study.

Background: Graduated compression stocking (GCS) is one the most widely used intervention methods in decreasing venous stasis and preventing deep venous thrombosis in hospital patients. However, changes of femoral vein speed after using GCS, combining ankle pump movement or not, and the efficacy difference of GCS among brands are still unclear.

Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, healthy participants were assigned to wear one of the three different GCSs (type A, B and C) on both legs. Type B was with lower compressions at popliteal fossa, middle thigh and upper thigh, compared with type A and C. Blood flow velocity of femoral veins was measured with a Doppler ultrasound scanner in the following four conditions: Lying, ankle pump movement, wearing GCS, and GCS combining ankle pump movement. The differences of femoral vein velocity between conditions in each GCS type, and differences of femoral vein velocity changes between GCS type B and type C were compared, respectively.

Results: A total of 26 participants enrolled and 6 wore type A, 10 wore type B and 10 wore type C GCS. Compared with lying, participants wearing type B GCS had significant higher left femoral vein peak velocity (PVL) and left femoral vein trough velocity (TVL) (absolute difference [AD] 10.63, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.17-18.09, P=0.0210; AD 8.65, 95% CI: 2.84-14.46, P=0.0171, respectively). Compared with ankle pump movement only, TVL significantly increased in participants wearing type B GCS and so did right femoral vein trough velocity (TVR) in in participants wearing type C GCS. Comparing with lying, the AD of PVL was significantly higher in participants wearing type B GCS than those wearing type C GCS (10.63±12.03 vs. -0.23±8.89, P<0.05).

Conclusions: GCS with lower compressions at popliteal fossa, middle thigh and upper thigh was related with higher femoral vein velocity. Femoral vein velocity of left leg increased much more than that of right leg in participants wearing GCS with/without ankle pump movement. Further investigations are needed to translate the herein reported hemodynamic effect of different compression dosages into a potentially different clinical benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信