什么是“正在进行的”临床试验?对不同来源的分析揭示了临床试验何时开始和何时结束的异质定义:一项荟萃研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sao Paulo Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0634.R2.100523
Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Rachel Riera
{"title":"什么是“正在进行的”临床试验?对不同来源的分析揭示了临床试验何时开始和何时结束的异质定义:一项荟萃研究。","authors":"Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Rachel Riera","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0634.R2.100523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the concept of an \"ongoing study\" seems self-explanatory, it is difficult to determine whether a trial is underway.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the definitions of \"ongoing clinical trial\" across different clinical trial registries, methodological guidelines, and other sources.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This meta-research study was conducted at the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of relevant clinical trial registry databases, methodological guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, and other sources that would define or regulate clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified various heterogeneous definitions used by eligible sources at both the start and end of a clinical trial. The starting criteria used were as follows: when the team is planning the protocol, when permission is given to conduct the study, or when the first participant is enrolled. Some sources used the time at which the last outcome data was collected as a criterion to determine the end of the trial. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors stated that a study is still \"ongoing\" during the analysis process. Several sources use a vague definition or present no clear criteria for defining the start or end of a study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concept of \"ongoing clinical trials\" lacks a transparent and homogeneous definition across relevant sources. A consensus on this concept is important to facilitate the evaluation of available evidence and conduct research synthesis. Further efforts are necessary to determine the best definition for the start and end of a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is an \\\"ongoing\\\" clinical trial? An analysis of different sources revealed heterogeneous definitions of when a clinical trial starts and ends: a meta-research study.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Rachel Riera\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0634.R2.100523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the concept of an \\\"ongoing study\\\" seems self-explanatory, it is difficult to determine whether a trial is underway.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the definitions of \\\"ongoing clinical trial\\\" across different clinical trial registries, methodological guidelines, and other sources.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This meta-research study was conducted at the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of relevant clinical trial registry databases, methodological guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, and other sources that would define or regulate clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified various heterogeneous definitions used by eligible sources at both the start and end of a clinical trial. The starting criteria used were as follows: when the team is planning the protocol, when permission is given to conduct the study, or when the first participant is enrolled. Some sources used the time at which the last outcome data was collected as a criterion to determine the end of the trial. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors stated that a study is still \\\"ongoing\\\" during the analysis process. Several sources use a vague definition or present no clear criteria for defining the start or end of a study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concept of \\\"ongoing clinical trials\\\" lacks a transparent and homogeneous definition across relevant sources. A consensus on this concept is important to facilitate the evaluation of available evidence and conduct research synthesis. Further efforts are necessary to determine the best definition for the start and end of a clinical trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0634.R2.100523\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0634.R2.100523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管“正在进行的研究”的概念似乎不言自明,但很难确定是否正在进行试验。目的:分析不同临床试验注册中心、方法指南和其他来源对“正在进行的临床试验”的定义。设计和设置:这项元研究在巴西圣保罗联邦大学(UNIFESP)进行。方法:我们对相关临床试验注册数据库、进行系统审查的方法指南以及定义或规范临床试验的其他来源进行了横断面分析。结果:我们确定了合格来源在临床试验开始和结束时使用的各种异质性定义。使用的起始标准如下:团队何时规划方案,何时获得进行研究的许可,或何时招募第一名参与者。一些资料来源将收集最后结果数据的时间作为确定试验结束的标准。国际医学期刊编辑委员会表示,在分析过程中,一项研究仍在“进行中”。一些来源对研究的开始或结束使用了模糊的定义或没有提出明确的标准。结论:“正在进行的临床试验”的概念在相关来源中缺乏透明和一致的定义。就这一概念达成共识对于促进对现有证据的评估和进行研究综合非常重要。需要进一步努力来确定临床试验开始和结束的最佳定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is an "ongoing" clinical trial? An analysis of different sources revealed heterogeneous definitions of when a clinical trial starts and ends: a meta-research study.

Background: Although the concept of an "ongoing study" seems self-explanatory, it is difficult to determine whether a trial is underway.

Objective: To analyze the definitions of "ongoing clinical trial" across different clinical trial registries, methodological guidelines, and other sources.

Design and setting: This meta-research study was conducted at the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of relevant clinical trial registry databases, methodological guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, and other sources that would define or regulate clinical trials.

Results: We identified various heterogeneous definitions used by eligible sources at both the start and end of a clinical trial. The starting criteria used were as follows: when the team is planning the protocol, when permission is given to conduct the study, or when the first participant is enrolled. Some sources used the time at which the last outcome data was collected as a criterion to determine the end of the trial. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors stated that a study is still "ongoing" during the analysis process. Several sources use a vague definition or present no clear criteria for defining the start or end of a study.

Conclusion: The concept of "ongoing clinical trials" lacks a transparent and homogeneous definition across relevant sources. A consensus on this concept is important to facilitate the evaluation of available evidence and conduct research synthesis. Further efforts are necessary to determine the best definition for the start and end of a clinical trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Sao Paulo Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信