葡萄牙猪囊异孢子虫:流行、管理和危险因素的观察性研究。

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Tiago Nunes, Vassilis Skampardonis, Francisco Costa, Maria Antónia da Conceição, Daniel Sperling
{"title":"葡萄牙猪囊异孢子虫:流行、管理和危险因素的观察性研究。","authors":"Tiago Nunes,&nbsp;Vassilis Skampardonis,&nbsp;Francisco Costa,&nbsp;Maria Antónia da Conceição,&nbsp;Daniel Sperling","doi":"10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal coccidiosis is a common and important disease of suckling piglets in modern farming caused by Cystoisospora suis. Prevalence rates are high, namely, in Portugal, although no recent data are available. The metaphylactic administration of a single dose of toltrazuril and hygienic measures are the backbone of control strategies on positive farms. However, several studies have shown that these programs are not always effective, underlining the need to revise the risk factors and control strategies currently applied. The present study evaluated C. suis prevalence on Portuguese farms and assessed the risk factors associated with facilities and farm rearing practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 27 tested farms, 23 were positive to Cystoisopora suis (85.2%). In total, 258 litters were sampled (accounting for 516 samples-2 samples per litter), with an average of 59.7% of positive litters per positive farm. Faecal pools from litters, in which liquid faeces predominated had a higher probability of containing oocysts than litter pools with mainly solid (Odds Ratio: 9.87; p < 0.0001) or pasty faeces (OR: 7.05; p = 0.001), and samples obtained from younger animals had higher oocyst counts (coefficient: - 0.0720; 95% CI - 0.125; - 0.019). No significant effect of toltrazuril administration was observed on the positivity rate, and none of the tested farms used disinfectants with official claims against parasites and known anticoccidial effects (e.g., cresol-based products).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The C. suis prevalence on Portuguese swine farms appears to be similar to the prevalence found in other European countries. Repeated sampling of the same litter and the use of autofluorescence microscopy after a modified Ritchie technique seems to have increased sensitivity and consequently the detection rate of positive litters. Finally, despite the common use of oral toltrazuril, C. suis control programs appear to not always be effective (based on the detection of oocysts in faecal samples), suggesting the need to revise the control strategies applied in the field, including management factors and choices of disinfectant products.</p>","PeriodicalId":20352,"journal":{"name":"Porcine Health Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Tiago Nunes,&nbsp;Vassilis Skampardonis,&nbsp;Francisco Costa,&nbsp;Maria Antónia da Conceição,&nbsp;Daniel Sperling\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal coccidiosis is a common and important disease of suckling piglets in modern farming caused by Cystoisospora suis. Prevalence rates are high, namely, in Portugal, although no recent data are available. The metaphylactic administration of a single dose of toltrazuril and hygienic measures are the backbone of control strategies on positive farms. However, several studies have shown that these programs are not always effective, underlining the need to revise the risk factors and control strategies currently applied. The present study evaluated C. suis prevalence on Portuguese farms and assessed the risk factors associated with facilities and farm rearing practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 27 tested farms, 23 were positive to Cystoisopora suis (85.2%). In total, 258 litters were sampled (accounting for 516 samples-2 samples per litter), with an average of 59.7% of positive litters per positive farm. Faecal pools from litters, in which liquid faeces predominated had a higher probability of containing oocysts than litter pools with mainly solid (Odds Ratio: 9.87; p < 0.0001) or pasty faeces (OR: 7.05; p = 0.001), and samples obtained from younger animals had higher oocyst counts (coefficient: - 0.0720; 95% CI - 0.125; - 0.019). No significant effect of toltrazuril administration was observed on the positivity rate, and none of the tested farms used disinfectants with official claims against parasites and known anticoccidial effects (e.g., cresol-based products).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The C. suis prevalence on Portuguese swine farms appears to be similar to the prevalence found in other European countries. Repeated sampling of the same litter and the use of autofluorescence microscopy after a modified Ritchie technique seems to have increased sensitivity and consequently the detection rate of positive litters. Finally, despite the common use of oral toltrazuril, C. suis control programs appear to not always be effective (based on the detection of oocysts in faecal samples), suggesting the need to revise the control strategies applied in the field, including management factors and choices of disinfectant products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Porcine Health Management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Porcine Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porcine Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿球虫病是现代养殖中由猪囊异孢子虫引起的哺乳仔猪常见而重要的疾病。流行率很高,即在葡萄牙,尽管没有最近的数据。单剂妥曲祖利的变态反应性施用和卫生措施是阳性农场控制策略的支柱。然而,一些研究表明,这些计划并不总是有效的,强调需要修改目前应用的风险因素和控制策略。本研究评估了葡萄牙农场猪链球菌的流行情况,并评估了与设施和农场饲养方法相关的风险因素。结果:27个养殖场猪囊异孢子菌阳性23个,阳性率85.2%;总共采集了258窝(516个样本,每窝2个样本),平均每个阳性农场的阳性窝数为59.7%。以液体粪便为主的窝粪池比以固体粪便为主的窝粪池含有卵囊的概率更高(优势比:9.87;结论:葡萄牙养猪场的猪链球菌流行率似乎与其他欧洲国家的流行率相似。在改良Ritchie技术后,对同一凋落物重复取样和使用自体荧光显微镜似乎增加了敏感性,从而提高了阳性凋落物的检出率。最后,尽管通常使用口服妥曲祖利,但猪链球菌控制方案似乎并不总是有效(基于粪便样本中卵囊的检测),这表明需要修改在该领域应用的控制策略,包括管理因素和消毒剂产品的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors.

Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors.

Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors.

Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors.

Background: Neonatal coccidiosis is a common and important disease of suckling piglets in modern farming caused by Cystoisospora suis. Prevalence rates are high, namely, in Portugal, although no recent data are available. The metaphylactic administration of a single dose of toltrazuril and hygienic measures are the backbone of control strategies on positive farms. However, several studies have shown that these programs are not always effective, underlining the need to revise the risk factors and control strategies currently applied. The present study evaluated C. suis prevalence on Portuguese farms and assessed the risk factors associated with facilities and farm rearing practices.

Results: From the 27 tested farms, 23 were positive to Cystoisopora suis (85.2%). In total, 258 litters were sampled (accounting for 516 samples-2 samples per litter), with an average of 59.7% of positive litters per positive farm. Faecal pools from litters, in which liquid faeces predominated had a higher probability of containing oocysts than litter pools with mainly solid (Odds Ratio: 9.87; p < 0.0001) or pasty faeces (OR: 7.05; p = 0.001), and samples obtained from younger animals had higher oocyst counts (coefficient: - 0.0720; 95% CI - 0.125; - 0.019). No significant effect of toltrazuril administration was observed on the positivity rate, and none of the tested farms used disinfectants with official claims against parasites and known anticoccidial effects (e.g., cresol-based products).

Conclusions: The C. suis prevalence on Portuguese swine farms appears to be similar to the prevalence found in other European countries. Repeated sampling of the same litter and the use of autofluorescence microscopy after a modified Ritchie technique seems to have increased sensitivity and consequently the detection rate of positive litters. Finally, despite the common use of oral toltrazuril, C. suis control programs appear to not always be effective (based on the detection of oocysts in faecal samples), suggesting the need to revise the control strategies applied in the field, including management factors and choices of disinfectant products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Porcine Health Management
Porcine Health Management Veterinary-Food Animals
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Porcine Health Management (PHM) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish relevant, novel and revised information regarding all aspects of swine health medicine and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信