脂蛋白(a)与冠心病患者长期出血风险的反向关系:来自亚洲多中心队列的启示。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Thrombosis and haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771188
Peizhi Wang, Deshan Yuan, Xueyan Zhao, Pei Zhu, Xiaogang Guo, Lin Jiang, Na Xu, Zhifang Wang, Ru Liu, Qingsheng Wang, Yan Chen, Yongzhen Zhang, Jingjing Xu, Zhenyu Liu, Ying Song, Zheng Zhang, Yi Yao, Yingqing Feng, Xiaofang Tang, Xiaozeng Wang, Runlin Gao, Yaling Han, Jinqing Yuan
{"title":"脂蛋白(a)与冠心病患者长期出血风险的反向关系:来自亚洲多中心队列的启示。","authors":"Peizhi Wang, Deshan Yuan, Xueyan Zhao, Pei Zhu, Xiaogang Guo, Lin Jiang, Na Xu, Zhifang Wang, Ru Liu, Qingsheng Wang, Yan Chen, Yongzhen Zhang, Jingjing Xu, Zhenyu Liu, Ying Song, Zheng Zhang, Yi Yao, Yingqing Feng, Xiaofang Tang, Xiaozeng Wang, Runlin Gao, Yaling Han, Jinqing Yuan","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), has been recognized as a strong risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between Lp(a) and bleeding remains indistinct, especially in the secondary prevention population of coronary artery disease (CAD). This investigation aimed to evaluate the association of Lp(a) with long-term bleeding among patients with CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Based on a prospective multicenter cohort of patients with CAD consecutively enrolled from January 2015 to May 2019 in China, the current analysis included 16,150 participants. Thus, according to Lp(a) quintiles, all subjects were divided into five groups. The primary endpoint was bleeding at 2-year follow-up, and the secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 2,747 (17.0%) bleeding and 525 (3.3%) major bleeding were recorded during a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the highest bleeding incidence in Lp(a) quintile 1, compared with patients in Lp(a) quintiles 2 to 5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while the incidence of major bleeding seemed similar between the two groups. Moreover, restricted cubic spline analysis suggested that there was an L-shaped association between Lp(a) and 2-year bleeding after adjustment for potential confounding factors, whereas there was no significant association between Lp(a) and 2-year major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There was an inverse and L-shaped association of Lp(a) with bleeding at 2-year follow-up in patients with CAD. More attention and effort should be made to increase the clinician awareness of Lp(a)'s role, as a novel marker for bleeding risk to better guide shared-decision making in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23036,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":"684-694"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inverse Association of Lipoprotein(a) on Long-Term Bleeding Risk in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Insight from a Multicenter Cohort in Asia.\",\"authors\":\"Peizhi Wang, Deshan Yuan, Xueyan Zhao, Pei Zhu, Xiaogang Guo, Lin Jiang, Na Xu, Zhifang Wang, Ru Liu, Qingsheng Wang, Yan Chen, Yongzhen Zhang, Jingjing Xu, Zhenyu Liu, Ying Song, Zheng Zhang, Yi Yao, Yingqing Feng, Xiaofang Tang, Xiaozeng Wang, Runlin Gao, Yaling Han, Jinqing Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), has been recognized as a strong risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between Lp(a) and bleeding remains indistinct, especially in the secondary prevention population of coronary artery disease (CAD). This investigation aimed to evaluate the association of Lp(a) with long-term bleeding among patients with CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Based on a prospective multicenter cohort of patients with CAD consecutively enrolled from January 2015 to May 2019 in China, the current analysis included 16,150 participants. Thus, according to Lp(a) quintiles, all subjects were divided into five groups. The primary endpoint was bleeding at 2-year follow-up, and the secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 2,747 (17.0%) bleeding and 525 (3.3%) major bleeding were recorded during a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the highest bleeding incidence in Lp(a) quintile 1, compared with patients in Lp(a) quintiles 2 to 5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while the incidence of major bleeding seemed similar between the two groups. Moreover, restricted cubic spline analysis suggested that there was an L-shaped association between Lp(a) and 2-year bleeding after adjustment for potential confounding factors, whereas there was no significant association between Lp(a) and 2-year major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There was an inverse and L-shaped association of Lp(a) with bleeding at 2-year follow-up in patients with CAD. More attention and effort should be made to increase the clinician awareness of Lp(a)'s role, as a novel marker for bleeding risk to better guide shared-decision making in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"684-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脂蛋白(a)或 Lp(a)被认为是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的一个重要危险因素。然而,脂蛋白(a)与出血之间的关系仍不明确,尤其是在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的二级预防人群中。本研究旨在评估脂蛋白(a)与冠心病患者长期出血的关系:本次分析基于 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 5 月在中国连续入组的前瞻性多中心队列,共纳入 16150 名 CAD 患者。因此,根据脂蛋白(a)五分位数,所有受试者被分为五组。主要终点为随访2年的出血量,次要终点为随访2年的大出血量:中位随访 2.0 年期间,共记录了 2,747 例(17.0%)出血和 525 例(3.3%)大出血。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,与 Lp(a) 五分位数 2 至 5 的患者相比,Lp(a) 五分位数 1 的患者出血发生率最高(p 结论:Lp(a) 五分位数 1 和 Lp(a) 五分位数 2 的患者出血发生率呈反比和 L 型:在对 CAD 患者的 2 年随访中,Lp(a) 与出血呈反向 L 型关系。临床医生应更加重视并努力提高对脂蛋白(a)作为出血风险新标志物的作用的认识,以更好地指导临床实践中的共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inverse Association of Lipoprotein(a) on Long-Term Bleeding Risk in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Insight from a Multicenter Cohort in Asia.

Background:  Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), has been recognized as a strong risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between Lp(a) and bleeding remains indistinct, especially in the secondary prevention population of coronary artery disease (CAD). This investigation aimed to evaluate the association of Lp(a) with long-term bleeding among patients with CAD.

Methods:  Based on a prospective multicenter cohort of patients with CAD consecutively enrolled from January 2015 to May 2019 in China, the current analysis included 16,150 participants. Thus, according to Lp(a) quintiles, all subjects were divided into five groups. The primary endpoint was bleeding at 2-year follow-up, and the secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 2-year follow-up.

Results:  A total of 2,747 (17.0%) bleeding and 525 (3.3%) major bleeding were recorded during a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the highest bleeding incidence in Lp(a) quintile 1, compared with patients in Lp(a) quintiles 2 to 5 (p < 0.001), while the incidence of major bleeding seemed similar between the two groups. Moreover, restricted cubic spline analysis suggested that there was an L-shaped association between Lp(a) and 2-year bleeding after adjustment for potential confounding factors, whereas there was no significant association between Lp(a) and 2-year major bleeding.

Conclusion:  There was an inverse and L-shaped association of Lp(a) with bleeding at 2-year follow-up in patients with CAD. More attention and effort should be made to increase the clinician awareness of Lp(a)'s role, as a novel marker for bleeding risk to better guide shared-decision making in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Thrombosis and haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thrombosis and Haemostasis publishes reports on basic, translational and clinical research dedicated to novel results and highest quality in any area of thrombosis and haemostasis, vascular biology and medicine, inflammation and infection, platelet and leukocyte biology, from genetic, molecular & cellular studies, diagnostic, therapeutic & preventative studies to high-level translational and clinical research. The journal provides position and guideline papers, state-of-the-art papers, expert analysis and commentaries, and dedicated theme issues covering recent developments and key topics in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信