Katalin Demeter, Rita Linke, Elisenda Ballesté, Georg Reischer, René E Mayer, Julia Vierheilig, Claudia Kolm, Margaret E Stevenson, Julia Derx, Alexander K T Kirschner, Regina Sommer, Orin C Shanks, Anicet R Blanch, Joan B Rose, Warish Ahmed, Andreas H Farnleitner
{"title":"用于粪便污染诊断和污染源追踪的基因靶标是否已经彻底改变了水质分析?","authors":"Katalin Demeter, Rita Linke, Elisenda Ballesté, Georg Reischer, René E Mayer, Julia Vierheilig, Claudia Kolm, Margaret E Stevenson, Julia Derx, Alexander K T Kirschner, Regina Sommer, Orin C Shanks, Anicet R Blanch, Joan B Rose, Warish Ahmed, Andreas H Farnleitner","doi":"10.1093/femsre/fuad028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impacts of nucleic acid-based methods - such as PCR and sequencing - to detect and analyze indicators, genetic markers or molecular signatures of microbial faecal pollution in health-related water quality research were assessed by rigorous literature analysis. A wide range of application areas and study designs has been identified since the first application more than 30 years ago (>1100 publications). Given the consistency of methods and assessment types, we suggest defining this emerging part of science as a new discipline: genetic faecal pollution diagnostics (GFPD) in health-related microbial water quality analysis. Undoubtedly, GFPD has already revolutionized faecal pollution detection (i.e., traditional or alternative general faecal indicator/marker analysis) and microbial source tracking (i.e., host-associated faecal indicator/marker analysis), the current core applications. GFPD is also expanding to many other research areas, including infection and health risk assessment, evaluation of microbial water treatment, and support of wastewater surveillance. In addition, storage of DNA extracts allows for biobanking, which opens up new perspectives. The tools of GFPD can be combined with cultivation-based standardized faecal indicator enumeration, pathogen detection, and various environmental data types, in an integrated data analysis approach. This comprehensive meta-analysis provides the scientific status quo of this field, including trend analyses and literature statistics, outlining identified application areas, and discusses the benefits and challenges of nucleic acid-based analysis in GFPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12201,"journal":{"name":"FEMS microbiology reviews","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Have genetic targets for faecal pollution diagnostics and source tracking revolutionized water quality analysis yet?\",\"authors\":\"Katalin Demeter, Rita Linke, Elisenda Ballesté, Georg Reischer, René E Mayer, Julia Vierheilig, Claudia Kolm, Margaret E Stevenson, Julia Derx, Alexander K T Kirschner, Regina Sommer, Orin C Shanks, Anicet R Blanch, Joan B Rose, Warish Ahmed, Andreas H Farnleitner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/femsre/fuad028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The impacts of nucleic acid-based methods - such as PCR and sequencing - to detect and analyze indicators, genetic markers or molecular signatures of microbial faecal pollution in health-related water quality research were assessed by rigorous literature analysis. A wide range of application areas and study designs has been identified since the first application more than 30 years ago (>1100 publications). Given the consistency of methods and assessment types, we suggest defining this emerging part of science as a new discipline: genetic faecal pollution diagnostics (GFPD) in health-related microbial water quality analysis. Undoubtedly, GFPD has already revolutionized faecal pollution detection (i.e., traditional or alternative general faecal indicator/marker analysis) and microbial source tracking (i.e., host-associated faecal indicator/marker analysis), the current core applications. GFPD is also expanding to many other research areas, including infection and health risk assessment, evaluation of microbial water treatment, and support of wastewater surveillance. In addition, storage of DNA extracts allows for biobanking, which opens up new perspectives. The tools of GFPD can be combined with cultivation-based standardized faecal indicator enumeration, pathogen detection, and various environmental data types, in an integrated data analysis approach. This comprehensive meta-analysis provides the scientific status quo of this field, including trend analyses and literature statistics, outlining identified application areas, and discusses the benefits and challenges of nucleic acid-based analysis in GFPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEMS microbiology reviews\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368376/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEMS microbiology reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuad028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEMS microbiology reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuad028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Have genetic targets for faecal pollution diagnostics and source tracking revolutionized water quality analysis yet?
The impacts of nucleic acid-based methods - such as PCR and sequencing - to detect and analyze indicators, genetic markers or molecular signatures of microbial faecal pollution in health-related water quality research were assessed by rigorous literature analysis. A wide range of application areas and study designs has been identified since the first application more than 30 years ago (>1100 publications). Given the consistency of methods and assessment types, we suggest defining this emerging part of science as a new discipline: genetic faecal pollution diagnostics (GFPD) in health-related microbial water quality analysis. Undoubtedly, GFPD has already revolutionized faecal pollution detection (i.e., traditional or alternative general faecal indicator/marker analysis) and microbial source tracking (i.e., host-associated faecal indicator/marker analysis), the current core applications. GFPD is also expanding to many other research areas, including infection and health risk assessment, evaluation of microbial water treatment, and support of wastewater surveillance. In addition, storage of DNA extracts allows for biobanking, which opens up new perspectives. The tools of GFPD can be combined with cultivation-based standardized faecal indicator enumeration, pathogen detection, and various environmental data types, in an integrated data analysis approach. This comprehensive meta-analysis provides the scientific status quo of this field, including trend analyses and literature statistics, outlining identified application areas, and discusses the benefits and challenges of nucleic acid-based analysis in GFPD.
期刊介绍:
Title: FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Journal Focus:
Publishes reviews covering all aspects of microbiology not recently surveyed
Reviews topics of current interest
Provides comprehensive, critical, and authoritative coverage
Offers new perspectives and critical, detailed discussions of significant trends
May contain speculative and selective elements
Aimed at both specialists and general readers
Reviews should be framed within the context of general microbiology and biology
Submission Criteria:
Manuscripts should not be unevaluated compilations of literature
Lectures delivered at symposia must review the related field to be acceptable