Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip微阵列上DNA甲基化探针可靠性的关键评估。

Wei Zhang, Juan I Young, Lissette Gomez, Michael A Schmidt, David Lukacsovich, Achintya Varma, X Steven Chen, Brian Kunkle, Eden R Martin, Lily Wang
{"title":"Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip微阵列上DNA甲基化探针可靠性的关键评估。","authors":"Wei Zhang, Juan I Young, Lissette Gomez, Michael A Schmidt, David Lukacsovich, Achintya Varma, X Steven Chen, Brian Kunkle, Eden R Martin, Lily Wang","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3068938/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA methylation (DNAm) plays a crucial role in a number of complex diseases. However, the reliability of DNAm levels measured using Illumina arrays varies across different probes. Previous research primarily assessed probe reliability by comparing duplicate samples between the 450k-450k or 450k-EPIC platforms, with limited investigations on Illumina EPIC arrays. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of the EPIC array probe reliability using 138 duplicated blood DNAm samples generated by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We introduced a novel statistical measure, the modified intraclass correlation, to better account for the disagreement in duplicate measurements. We observed higher reliability in probes with average methylation beta values of 0.2 to 0.8, and lower reliability in type I probes or those within the promoter and CpG island regions. Importantly, we found that probe reliability has significant implications in the analyses of Epigenome-wide Association Studies (EWAS). Higher reliability is associated with more consistent effect sizes in different studies, the identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and methylation quantitative trait locus (mQTLs), and significant correlations with downstream gene expression. Moreover, blood DNAm measurements obtained from probes with higher reliability are more likely to show concordance with brain DNAm measurements. Our findings, which provide crucial reliable information for probes on the EPIC array, will serve as a valuable resource for future DNAm studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21039,"journal":{"name":"Research Square","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarrays.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Zhang, Juan I Young, Lissette Gomez, Michael A Schmidt, David Lukacsovich, Achintya Varma, X Steven Chen, Brian Kunkle, Eden R Martin, Lily Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3068938/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>DNA methylation (DNAm) plays a crucial role in a number of complex diseases. However, the reliability of DNAm levels measured using Illumina arrays varies across different probes. Previous research primarily assessed probe reliability by comparing duplicate samples between the 450k-450k or 450k-EPIC platforms, with limited investigations on Illumina EPIC arrays. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of the EPIC array probe reliability using 138 duplicated blood DNAm samples generated by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We introduced a novel statistical measure, the modified intraclass correlation, to better account for the disagreement in duplicate measurements. We observed higher reliability in probes with average methylation beta values of 0.2 to 0.8, and lower reliability in type I probes or those within the promoter and CpG island regions. Importantly, we found that probe reliability has significant implications in the analyses of Epigenome-wide Association Studies (EWAS). Higher reliability is associated with more consistent effect sizes in different studies, the identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and methylation quantitative trait locus (mQTLs), and significant correlations with downstream gene expression. Moreover, blood DNAm measurements obtained from probes with higher reliability are more likely to show concordance with brain DNAm measurements. Our findings, which provide crucial reliable information for probes on the EPIC array, will serve as a valuable resource for future DNAm studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3068938/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3068938/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

DNA甲基化(DNAm)在许多复杂疾病中起着至关重要的作用。然而,使用Illumina阵列测量的DNAm水平的可靠性因不同探针而异。先前的研究主要通过比较450k-450k或450k EPIC平台之间的重复样本来评估探针的可靠性,而对Illumina EPIC阵列的研究有限。我们使用阿尔茨海默病神经成像倡议研究产生的138个重复血液DNAm样本对EPIC阵列探针的可靠性进行了全面评估。我们引入了一种新的统计测量方法,即改进的组内相关性,以更好地解释重复测量中的差异。我们在平均甲基化β值为0.2至0.8的探针中观察到更高的可靠性,而在I型探针或启动子和CpG岛区内的探针中则观察到更低的可靠性。重要的是,我们发现探针的可靠性在全表基因组关联研究(EWAS)的分析中具有重要意义。更高的可靠性与不同研究中更一致的效应大小、差异甲基化区域(DMRs)和甲基化定量性状基因座(mQTL)的鉴定以及与下游基因表达的显著相关性有关。此外,从具有更高可靠性的探针获得的血液DNAm测量更有可能显示出与大脑DNA测量的一致性。我们的发现为EPIC阵列上的探针提供了至关重要的可靠信息,将为未来的DNAm研究提供宝贵的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarrays.

Critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarrays.

Critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarrays.

Critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarrays.

DNA methylation (DNAm) plays a crucial role in a number of complex diseases. However, the reliability of DNAm levels measured using Illumina arrays varies across different probes. Previous research primarily assessed probe reliability by comparing duplicate samples between the 450k-450k or 450k-EPIC platforms, with limited investigations on Illumina EPIC arrays. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of the EPIC array probe reliability using 138 duplicated blood DNAm samples generated by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We introduced a novel statistical measure, the modified intraclass correlation, to better account for the disagreement in duplicate measurements. We observed higher reliability in probes with average methylation beta values of 0.2 to 0.8, and lower reliability in type I probes or those within the promoter and CpG island regions. Importantly, we found that probe reliability has significant implications in the analyses of Epigenome-wide Association Studies (EWAS). Higher reliability is associated with more consistent effect sizes in different studies, the identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and methylation quantitative trait locus (mQTLs), and significant correlations with downstream gene expression. Moreover, blood DNAm measurements obtained from probes with higher reliability are more likely to show concordance with brain DNAm measurements. Our findings, which provide crucial reliable information for probes on the EPIC array, will serve as a valuable resource for future DNAm studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信