改变病人教育技术的案例:走向基于场景和模拟的方法。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Elizabeth A Edmiston, Heather K Hardin, Mary A Dolansky
{"title":"改变病人教育技术的案例:走向基于场景和模拟的方法。","authors":"Elizabeth A Edmiston, Heather K Hardin, Mary A Dolansky","doi":"10.1177/10547738231173754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient education has an important role in nursing. Historically, nurses were trained to provide patient education on disease and self-management using knowledge-transfer resources (Wittink & Oosterhaven, 2018). As health profession education models move toward simulation, patient education may also benefit from greater use of simulation. Simulation is a teaching method that assesses both knowledge and skill levels by placing the learner in a problemsolving scenario. Using simulation in patient education may enhance the patients’ ability to self-manage chronic disease by having them demonstrate problem-solving skills, which can illuminate gaps in knowledge, understanding, and application that can be addressed. This recommendation for greater use of simulation in patient education is supported by the results of a study (Edmiston et al., 2023a, 2023b) in which advanced heart failure patients were assessed concerning three self-management components: knowledge, ability, and problem-solving in a scenario. The people with advanced heart failure consistently scored adequate or high in heart failure knowledge; however, they performed poorly in heart failure self-management ability and problem-solving in a scenario. The patients seemed to have general heart failure self-management knowledge, such as how often to weigh themselves and the causes of heart failure but could not apply that knowledge to problem solve in a scenario about heart failure symptoms. There was a discordance among heart failure self-management knowledge, ability, and decision-making in this sample of people with advanced heart failure. General adult learning theory and principles (Bloom et al., 2001; Kennedy & Parish, 2021) emphasize a hierarchy of learning that builds on knowledge with understanding, followed by application skills. Patients are often given written reading material and are expected to read, understand, and apply the material to their chronic condition. Patients may be quizzed on chronic disease self-management (e.g., How often do you weigh yourself? How much sodium can you have each day?). However, a gap remains between patients’ self-management knowledge, understanding, and application, which results in inadequate self-management and readmissions for fluid overload or other symptoms. Patients must be able to apply knowledge and understanding for effective self-management of chronic disease. Simulation can help bridge this gap. A small number of studies have shown that patient education using scenarios and simulation are successful. Koulas et al. (2021) developed and tested virtual patient scenarios for people with rheumatic disorders and received the “best imaginable” positive reviews from participants. In a randomized controlled trial of people with type 2 diabetes, participants randomized to the group who received simulation education in addition to basic diabetes self-management education had superior glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial blood glucose level improvements at 6 months (Ji et al., 2019). Pennecot et al. (2022) piloted a Simulation in Therapeutic Patient Education intervention with adults diagnosed with diabetes and diabetes educators where the intervention included a pre-briefing, hypoglycemia simulation, and a debriefing. Participants found that both its perceived usefulness and satisfaction were high (Pennecot et al., 2022). Developing simulation and scenariobased assessment tools for patient education can assist nurses in assessing patients’ self-management knowledge, understanding, and application of skills for many chronic conditions across the life course. Prioritizing the use of simulation approaches to patient education may improve self-management of chronic conditions. Nursing can partner with medicine in this practice 1173754 CNRXXX10.1177/10547738231173754Clinical Nursing ResearchEdmiston et al. editorial2023","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the Case for a Change in Patient Education Techniques: Moving Toward Scenario and Simulation-Based Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A Edmiston, Heather K Hardin, Mary A Dolansky\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10547738231173754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patient education has an important role in nursing. Historically, nurses were trained to provide patient education on disease and self-management using knowledge-transfer resources (Wittink & Oosterhaven, 2018). As health profession education models move toward simulation, patient education may also benefit from greater use of simulation. Simulation is a teaching method that assesses both knowledge and skill levels by placing the learner in a problemsolving scenario. Using simulation in patient education may enhance the patients’ ability to self-manage chronic disease by having them demonstrate problem-solving skills, which can illuminate gaps in knowledge, understanding, and application that can be addressed. This recommendation for greater use of simulation in patient education is supported by the results of a study (Edmiston et al., 2023a, 2023b) in which advanced heart failure patients were assessed concerning three self-management components: knowledge, ability, and problem-solving in a scenario. The people with advanced heart failure consistently scored adequate or high in heart failure knowledge; however, they performed poorly in heart failure self-management ability and problem-solving in a scenario. The patients seemed to have general heart failure self-management knowledge, such as how often to weigh themselves and the causes of heart failure but could not apply that knowledge to problem solve in a scenario about heart failure symptoms. There was a discordance among heart failure self-management knowledge, ability, and decision-making in this sample of people with advanced heart failure. General adult learning theory and principles (Bloom et al., 2001; Kennedy & Parish, 2021) emphasize a hierarchy of learning that builds on knowledge with understanding, followed by application skills. Patients are often given written reading material and are expected to read, understand, and apply the material to their chronic condition. Patients may be quizzed on chronic disease self-management (e.g., How often do you weigh yourself? How much sodium can you have each day?). However, a gap remains between patients’ self-management knowledge, understanding, and application, which results in inadequate self-management and readmissions for fluid overload or other symptoms. Patients must be able to apply knowledge and understanding for effective self-management of chronic disease. Simulation can help bridge this gap. A small number of studies have shown that patient education using scenarios and simulation are successful. Koulas et al. (2021) developed and tested virtual patient scenarios for people with rheumatic disorders and received the “best imaginable” positive reviews from participants. In a randomized controlled trial of people with type 2 diabetes, participants randomized to the group who received simulation education in addition to basic diabetes self-management education had superior glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial blood glucose level improvements at 6 months (Ji et al., 2019). Pennecot et al. (2022) piloted a Simulation in Therapeutic Patient Education intervention with adults diagnosed with diabetes and diabetes educators where the intervention included a pre-briefing, hypoglycemia simulation, and a debriefing. Participants found that both its perceived usefulness and satisfaction were high (Pennecot et al., 2022). Developing simulation and scenariobased assessment tools for patient education can assist nurses in assessing patients’ self-management knowledge, understanding, and application of skills for many chronic conditions across the life course. Prioritizing the use of simulation approaches to patient education may improve self-management of chronic conditions. Nursing can partner with medicine in this practice 1173754 CNRXXX10.1177/10547738231173754Clinical Nursing ResearchEdmiston et al. editorial2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":50677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738231173754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738231173754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making the Case for a Change in Patient Education Techniques: Moving Toward Scenario and Simulation-Based Approaches.
Patient education has an important role in nursing. Historically, nurses were trained to provide patient education on disease and self-management using knowledge-transfer resources (Wittink & Oosterhaven, 2018). As health profession education models move toward simulation, patient education may also benefit from greater use of simulation. Simulation is a teaching method that assesses both knowledge and skill levels by placing the learner in a problemsolving scenario. Using simulation in patient education may enhance the patients’ ability to self-manage chronic disease by having them demonstrate problem-solving skills, which can illuminate gaps in knowledge, understanding, and application that can be addressed. This recommendation for greater use of simulation in patient education is supported by the results of a study (Edmiston et al., 2023a, 2023b) in which advanced heart failure patients were assessed concerning three self-management components: knowledge, ability, and problem-solving in a scenario. The people with advanced heart failure consistently scored adequate or high in heart failure knowledge; however, they performed poorly in heart failure self-management ability and problem-solving in a scenario. The patients seemed to have general heart failure self-management knowledge, such as how often to weigh themselves and the causes of heart failure but could not apply that knowledge to problem solve in a scenario about heart failure symptoms. There was a discordance among heart failure self-management knowledge, ability, and decision-making in this sample of people with advanced heart failure. General adult learning theory and principles (Bloom et al., 2001; Kennedy & Parish, 2021) emphasize a hierarchy of learning that builds on knowledge with understanding, followed by application skills. Patients are often given written reading material and are expected to read, understand, and apply the material to their chronic condition. Patients may be quizzed on chronic disease self-management (e.g., How often do you weigh yourself? How much sodium can you have each day?). However, a gap remains between patients’ self-management knowledge, understanding, and application, which results in inadequate self-management and readmissions for fluid overload or other symptoms. Patients must be able to apply knowledge and understanding for effective self-management of chronic disease. Simulation can help bridge this gap. A small number of studies have shown that patient education using scenarios and simulation are successful. Koulas et al. (2021) developed and tested virtual patient scenarios for people with rheumatic disorders and received the “best imaginable” positive reviews from participants. In a randomized controlled trial of people with type 2 diabetes, participants randomized to the group who received simulation education in addition to basic diabetes self-management education had superior glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial blood glucose level improvements at 6 months (Ji et al., 2019). Pennecot et al. (2022) piloted a Simulation in Therapeutic Patient Education intervention with adults diagnosed with diabetes and diabetes educators where the intervention included a pre-briefing, hypoglycemia simulation, and a debriefing. Participants found that both its perceived usefulness and satisfaction were high (Pennecot et al., 2022). Developing simulation and scenariobased assessment tools for patient education can assist nurses in assessing patients’ self-management knowledge, understanding, and application of skills for many chronic conditions across the life course. Prioritizing the use of simulation approaches to patient education may improve self-management of chronic conditions. Nursing can partner with medicine in this practice 1173754 CNRXXX10.1177/10547738231173754Clinical Nursing ResearchEdmiston et al. editorial2023
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信