传统ERP与act增强ERP对强迫症的不同心理过程。

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jennifer L Buchholz, Jonathan S Abramowitz, Samantha N Hellberg, Heidi J Ojalehto, Michael Twohig
{"title":"传统ERP与act增强ERP对强迫症的不同心理过程。","authors":"Jennifer L Buchholz,&nbsp;Jonathan S Abramowitz,&nbsp;Samantha N Hellberg,&nbsp;Heidi J Ojalehto,&nbsp;Michael Twohig","doi":"10.1891/JCP-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has been shown to promote willingness to experience intrusive thoughts among individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Exposure with response prevention (ERP) delivered from an ACT framework (i.e., ACT+ERP) may facilitate changes in how patients relate to their unwanted internal experiences.<b>Aims:</b> Accordingly, the present study aimed to examine the effect of ACT+ERP on appraisals of intrusive thoughts, relative to standard ERP.<b>Methods:</b> Forty-eight adults who received 16 treatment sessions as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing standard ERP to ACT+ERP completed the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory (III) at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up.<b>Results:</b> Results showed a significant main effect of time for all III subscales, suggesting that appraisals of intrusive thoughts shift over the course of treatment. The effect of the condition × time interaction, however, differed between the III subscales. Specifically, a significant interaction emerged for the control of thoughts subscale, such that individuals who received ACT+ERP experienced greater reductions in beliefs about the need to control thoughts. The interaction term was not significant for importance of thoughts or responsibility subscales.<b>Conclusions:</b> Findings suggest that augmenting ERP with ACT enhances change in beliefs about the need to control thoughts, but not in beliefs about responsibility and the importance of thoughts. Clinical implications and future research directions will be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Psychological Processes in Traditional and ACT-Enhanced ERP for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Buchholz,&nbsp;Jonathan S Abramowitz,&nbsp;Samantha N Hellberg,&nbsp;Heidi J Ojalehto,&nbsp;Michael Twohig\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JCP-2021-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has been shown to promote willingness to experience intrusive thoughts among individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Exposure with response prevention (ERP) delivered from an ACT framework (i.e., ACT+ERP) may facilitate changes in how patients relate to their unwanted internal experiences.<b>Aims:</b> Accordingly, the present study aimed to examine the effect of ACT+ERP on appraisals of intrusive thoughts, relative to standard ERP.<b>Methods:</b> Forty-eight adults who received 16 treatment sessions as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing standard ERP to ACT+ERP completed the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory (III) at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up.<b>Results:</b> Results showed a significant main effect of time for all III subscales, suggesting that appraisals of intrusive thoughts shift over the course of treatment. The effect of the condition × time interaction, however, differed between the III subscales. Specifically, a significant interaction emerged for the control of thoughts subscale, such that individuals who received ACT+ERP experienced greater reductions in beliefs about the need to control thoughts. The interaction term was not significant for importance of thoughts or responsibility subscales.<b>Conclusions:</b> Findings suggest that augmenting ERP with ACT enhances change in beliefs about the need to control thoughts, but not in beliefs about responsibility and the importance of thoughts. Clinical implications and future research directions will be discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2021-0004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2021-0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受与承诺疗法(ACT)已被证明能促进强迫症(OCD)患者体验侵入性思想的意愿。接触ACT框架(即ACT+ERP)提供的反应预防(ERP)可能有助于改变患者与他们不想要的内部体验的关系。目的:因此,本研究旨在检验ACT+ERP相对于标准ERP对侵入性思想评价的影响。方法:48名接受16次治疗的成年人,作为比较标准ERP和ACT+ERP的随机对照试验的一部分,在治疗前、治疗后和随访时完成了入侵量表(III)的解释。结果:结果显示时间对所有III次量表都有显著的主要影响,表明对侵入性思想的评价在治疗过程中发生了变化。然而,条件×时间相互作用的效果在三个分量表之间存在差异。具体来说,在思想控制子尺度上出现了显著的相互作用,例如,接受ACT+ERP的个体对控制思想需求的信念有更大的减少。交互作用项对思想和责任分量表的重要性不显著。结论:研究结果表明,用ACT增强ERP可以增强对控制思想需要的信念的改变,但不能增强对责任和思想重要性的信念的改变。讨论临床意义及未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different Psychological Processes in Traditional and ACT-Enhanced ERP for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Background: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has been shown to promote willingness to experience intrusive thoughts among individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Exposure with response prevention (ERP) delivered from an ACT framework (i.e., ACT+ERP) may facilitate changes in how patients relate to their unwanted internal experiences.Aims: Accordingly, the present study aimed to examine the effect of ACT+ERP on appraisals of intrusive thoughts, relative to standard ERP.Methods: Forty-eight adults who received 16 treatment sessions as part of a randomized controlled trial comparing standard ERP to ACT+ERP completed the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory (III) at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up.Results: Results showed a significant main effect of time for all III subscales, suggesting that appraisals of intrusive thoughts shift over the course of treatment. The effect of the condition × time interaction, however, differed between the III subscales. Specifically, a significant interaction emerged for the control of thoughts subscale, such that individuals who received ACT+ERP experienced greater reductions in beliefs about the need to control thoughts. The interaction term was not significant for importance of thoughts or responsibility subscales.Conclusions: Findings suggest that augmenting ERP with ACT enhances change in beliefs about the need to control thoughts, but not in beliefs about responsibility and the importance of thoughts. Clinical implications and future research directions will be discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy is devoted to advancing the science and clinical practice of cognitive-behavior therapy. This includes a range of interventions including cognitive therapy, rational-emotive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness approaches. The journal publishes empirical papers, including case studies, along with review articles, papers that integrate cognitive-behavior therapy with other systems, and practical "how to" articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信