基于阻抗的血液分析仪中的血小板计数:小心陷阱!

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-28 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21
Vani Krishnamurthy, Archana Shivamurthy, Pradeep V Kumar
{"title":"基于阻抗的血液分析仪中的血小板计数:小心陷阱!","authors":"Vani Krishnamurthy,&nbsp;Archana Shivamurthy,&nbsp;Pradeep V Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the blood counts, platelet count is most often reported with inconsistency. Many of the analyzers work on electrical impedance principle for red blood cell (RBC) and platelet counting. However, with this technology, factors such as fragmented RBCs, microcytes, cytoplasmic fragments of leukemic cells, lipid particles, fungal yeast forms, and bacteria are known to interfere with platelet count and give spuriously elevated platelet counts. A 72-year-old male was admitted for the treatment of dengue infection who had serial platelet count monitoring. He had an initial platelet count of 48,000/cumm which suddenly improved to 2.6 lakhs within 6 h without any platelet transfusion. Peripheral smear however did not correlate with the machine-derived count. Repeat test after 6 h yielded a result of 56,000/cumm which correlated well with the peripheral smear. This falsely elevated count was due to the presence of lipid particles as the sample was drawn in the postprandial state.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"131-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/5a/AJTS-17-131.PMC10180802.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet count in impedance-based hematology analyzer: Beware of trap!\",\"authors\":\"Vani Krishnamurthy,&nbsp;Archana Shivamurthy,&nbsp;Pradeep V Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Among the blood counts, platelet count is most often reported with inconsistency. Many of the analyzers work on electrical impedance principle for red blood cell (RBC) and platelet counting. However, with this technology, factors such as fragmented RBCs, microcytes, cytoplasmic fragments of leukemic cells, lipid particles, fungal yeast forms, and bacteria are known to interfere with platelet count and give spuriously elevated platelet counts. A 72-year-old male was admitted for the treatment of dengue infection who had serial platelet count monitoring. He had an initial platelet count of 48,000/cumm which suddenly improved to 2.6 lakhs within 6 h without any platelet transfusion. Peripheral smear however did not correlate with the machine-derived count. Repeat test after 6 h yielded a result of 56,000/cumm which correlated well with the peripheral smear. This falsely elevated count was due to the presence of lipid particles as the sample was drawn in the postprandial state.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"131-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/5a/AJTS-17-131.PMC10180802.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_65_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在血液计数中,血小板计数最常被报道为不一致。许多分析仪采用电阻抗原理进行红细胞(RBC)和血小板计数。然而,利用这项技术,已知碎片化的红细胞、微细胞、白血病细胞的细胞质片段、脂质颗粒、真菌酵母形式和细菌等因素会干扰血小板计数,并导致血小板计数虚假升高。一名72岁男性因登革热感染入院接受治疗,并进行了连续的血小板计数监测。他最初的血小板计数为48000/cumm,在没有任何血小板输注的情况下,在6小时内突然提高到260万。然而,外周涂片与机器得出的计数并不相关。6小时后重复测试得到56000/cumm的结果,这与外周涂片有很好的相关性。这种错误升高的计数是由于在餐后状态下提取样本时存在脂质颗粒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Platelet count in impedance-based hematology analyzer: Beware of trap!

Platelet count in impedance-based hematology analyzer: Beware of trap!

Among the blood counts, platelet count is most often reported with inconsistency. Many of the analyzers work on electrical impedance principle for red blood cell (RBC) and platelet counting. However, with this technology, factors such as fragmented RBCs, microcytes, cytoplasmic fragments of leukemic cells, lipid particles, fungal yeast forms, and bacteria are known to interfere with platelet count and give spuriously elevated platelet counts. A 72-year-old male was admitted for the treatment of dengue infection who had serial platelet count monitoring. He had an initial platelet count of 48,000/cumm which suddenly improved to 2.6 lakhs within 6 h without any platelet transfusion. Peripheral smear however did not correlate with the machine-derived count. Repeat test after 6 h yielded a result of 56,000/cumm which correlated well with the peripheral smear. This falsely elevated count was due to the presence of lipid particles as the sample was drawn in the postprandial state.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信