三种药用植物荆芥、柽柳五种DNA提取方法的比较。和Potentilla reptans L。

IF 1.5 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Zahra Salehi, Atefe Amirahmadi, Arezou Rezaei, Parisa Farrokh, Javad Ghasemian
{"title":"三种药用植物荆芥、柽柳五种DNA提取方法的比较。和Potentilla reptans L。","authors":"Zahra Salehi,&nbsp;Atefe Amirahmadi,&nbsp;Arezou Rezaei,&nbsp;Parisa Farrokh,&nbsp;Javad Ghasemian","doi":"10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson method, and the Gene All kit were statistically compared based on the quantity and quality of the total DNA (tDNA) extracted from fresh and dried leaves of three medicinal herbs <i>P. harmala</i>, <i>T. ramosissima</i>, and <i>P. reptans</i>. The suitability of the tDNAs for molecular studies was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in nuclear DNA and the <i>trn</i>L-F region in chloroplast DNA. Some significant differences were found between the tDNAs extracted by five extraction methods. With the exception of <i>P. harmala</i>, where the PCR of both the ITS fragments and the <i>trn</i>L-F region worked successfully in all DNA samples, but only the ITS fragments, not the chloroplast <i>trn</i>L-F region, were amplified in the DNA samples of <i>T. ramosissima</i> and <i>P. reptans</i>. The chloroplast <i>trn</i>L-F region was amplified only in DNA samples extracted from fresh and dried leaves of the three studied herbs using the commercial kit. Gene All kit, the main CTAB method, and its modified protocols were the less time-consuming protocols that yielded DNA suitable for downstream PCR vis-a-vis the modified Murray and Thompson method.</p>","PeriodicalId":19025,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Biology Research Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186858/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: <i>Peganum harmala</i> L., <i>Tamarix ramosissima</i> Ledeb., and <i>Potentilla reptans</i> L.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Salehi,&nbsp;Atefe Amirahmadi,&nbsp;Arezou Rezaei,&nbsp;Parisa Farrokh,&nbsp;Javad Ghasemian\",\"doi\":\"10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson method, and the Gene All kit were statistically compared based on the quantity and quality of the total DNA (tDNA) extracted from fresh and dried leaves of three medicinal herbs <i>P. harmala</i>, <i>T. ramosissima</i>, and <i>P. reptans</i>. The suitability of the tDNAs for molecular studies was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in nuclear DNA and the <i>trn</i>L-F region in chloroplast DNA. Some significant differences were found between the tDNAs extracted by five extraction methods. With the exception of <i>P. harmala</i>, where the PCR of both the ITS fragments and the <i>trn</i>L-F region worked successfully in all DNA samples, but only the ITS fragments, not the chloroplast <i>trn</i>L-F region, were amplified in the DNA samples of <i>T. ramosissima</i> and <i>P. reptans</i>. The chloroplast <i>trn</i>L-F region was amplified only in DNA samples extracted from fresh and dried leaves of the three studied herbs using the commercial kit. Gene All kit, the main CTAB method, and its modified protocols were the less time-consuming protocols that yielded DNA suitable for downstream PCR vis-a-vis the modified Murray and Thompson method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Biology Research Communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Biology Research Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Biology Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22099/mbrc.2023.45131.1798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于细胞壁、色素和一些次生代谢物的存在,从植物样品中提取高产量、高质量的DNA具有挑战性。对主要的CTAB法及其两种改进方案(β -巯基乙醇或乙酸铵)、改进的Murray和Thompson法以及Gene All试剂盒从三种药材的鲜叶和干叶中提取的总DNA (tDNA)的数量和质量进行统计比较。利用核DNA内转录间隔段(ITS)片段和叶绿体DNA trl - f区片段的聚合酶链反应(PCR)对tdna进行分子研究的适宜性评价。五种提取方法提取的tdna存在显著差异。除甘蓝花(P. harmala)的ITS片段和trnL-F区域的PCR在所有DNA样品中都成功扩增外,但在毛毛田鼠(T. ramosissima)和爬行田鼠(P. reptans)的DNA样品中只能扩增ITS片段,而不能扩增叶绿体trnL-F区域。叶绿体trnL-F区域仅在使用商业试剂盒从三种研究草药的新鲜和干燥叶片中提取的DNA样本中扩增。与改进的Murray和Thompson方法相比,主要的CTAB方法Gene All kit及其改进方案是产生适合下游PCR的DNA所需时间较少的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: <i>Peganum harmala</i> L., <i>Tamarix ramosissima</i> Ledeb., and <i>Potentilla reptans</i> L.

Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: <i>Peganum harmala</i> L., <i>Tamarix ramosissima</i> Ledeb., and <i>Potentilla reptans</i> L.

Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in three medicinal plants: Peganum harmala L., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., and Potentilla reptans L.

Extracting high-yield, high-quality DNA from plant samples is challenging due to the presence of the cell wall, pigments, and some secondary metabolites. The main CTAB method, two of its modified protocols (beta-mercaptoethanol or ammonium acetate were eliminated), the modified Murray and Thompson method, and the Gene All kit were statistically compared based on the quantity and quality of the total DNA (tDNA) extracted from fresh and dried leaves of three medicinal herbs P. harmala, T. ramosissima, and P. reptans. The suitability of the tDNAs for molecular studies was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in nuclear DNA and the trnL-F region in chloroplast DNA. Some significant differences were found between the tDNAs extracted by five extraction methods. With the exception of P. harmala, where the PCR of both the ITS fragments and the trnL-F region worked successfully in all DNA samples, but only the ITS fragments, not the chloroplast trnL-F region, were amplified in the DNA samples of T. ramosissima and P. reptans. The chloroplast trnL-F region was amplified only in DNA samples extracted from fresh and dried leaves of the three studied herbs using the commercial kit. Gene All kit, the main CTAB method, and its modified protocols were the less time-consuming protocols that yielded DNA suitable for downstream PCR vis-a-vis the modified Murray and Thompson method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Biology Research Communications
Molecular Biology Research Communications BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: “Molecular Biology Research Communications” (MBRC) is an international journal of Molecular Biology. It is published quarterly by Shiraz University (Iran). The MBRC is a fully peer-reviewed journal. The journal welcomes submission of Original articles, Short communications, Invited review articles, and Letters to the Editor which meets the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence in all fields of “Molecular Biology”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信