Lena G Becker, Shayan Asadi, Mark Zimmerman, Theresa A Morgan, Craig Rodriguez-Seijas
{"title":"在少数民族患者中边缘型人格障碍的诊断是否存在偏见?","authors":"Lena G Becker, Shayan Asadi, Mark Zimmerman, Theresa A Morgan, Craig Rodriguez-Seijas","doi":"10.1037/per0000579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Empirical evidence documents disparities in the diagnosis of severe forms of psychopathology among racial/ethnic minority persons. However, research on diagnostic differences in personality disorders is equivocal: Some suggest higher prevalence of personality disorders among racial/ethnic minority persons, whereas other results suggest the opposite. The goal of the current study was to investigate (a) differences in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a mostly cisgender, heterosexual sample among racial/ethnic minority patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients and (b) whether any observed differences were attributable to differences in underlying maladaptive personality domains. Using data from partial hospital patients (<i>N</i> = 2,657), we found few differences in the diagnosis of BPD based on racial/ethnic group membership. We also conducted measurement invariance analyses of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5-</i>Brief Form (PID-5-BF), finding evidence of invariance across White and non-White participants in these data. Any instances of diagnostic disparity were explained by group differences in maladaptive personality domains. These results provide context to the extant literature documenting mixed results about racial/ethnic differences in prevalence of personality disorders. In addition, they suggest relative specificity in BPD diagnostic bias related to sexual minority populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a bias in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder among racially minoritized patients?\",\"authors\":\"Lena G Becker, Shayan Asadi, Mark Zimmerman, Theresa A Morgan, Craig Rodriguez-Seijas\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/per0000579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Empirical evidence documents disparities in the diagnosis of severe forms of psychopathology among racial/ethnic minority persons. However, research on diagnostic differences in personality disorders is equivocal: Some suggest higher prevalence of personality disorders among racial/ethnic minority persons, whereas other results suggest the opposite. The goal of the current study was to investigate (a) differences in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a mostly cisgender, heterosexual sample among racial/ethnic minority patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients and (b) whether any observed differences were attributable to differences in underlying maladaptive personality domains. Using data from partial hospital patients (<i>N</i> = 2,657), we found few differences in the diagnosis of BPD based on racial/ethnic group membership. We also conducted measurement invariance analyses of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5-</i>Brief Form (PID-5-BF), finding evidence of invariance across White and non-White participants in these data. Any instances of diagnostic disparity were explained by group differences in maladaptive personality domains. These results provide context to the extant literature documenting mixed results about racial/ethnic differences in prevalence of personality disorders. In addition, they suggest relative specificity in BPD diagnostic bias related to sexual minority populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
经验证据证明,在种族/少数民族人群中,严重精神病理形式的诊断存在差异。然而,关于人格障碍诊断差异的研究是模棱两可的:一些研究表明,少数民族/种族人群中人格障碍的患病率较高,而另一些研究结果则相反。本研究的目的是调查(a)与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,在多数为异性恋的种族/少数族裔患者中,边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的诊断差异,以及(b)观察到的差异是否可归因于潜在的适应不良人格领域的差异。使用部分医院患者的数据(N = 2657),我们发现基于种族/民族成员的BPD诊断差异不大。我们还对DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF)的人格量表(Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form, PID-5-BF)进行了测量不变性分析,发现这些数据在白人和非白人参与者之间存在不变性。任何诊断差异的例子都可以用不适应人格领域的群体差异来解释。这些结果为现有文献提供了背景,这些文献记录了关于人格障碍患病率的种族/民族差异的混合结果。此外,他们还提出了与性少数人群相关的BPD诊断偏差的相对特异性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
Is there a bias in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder among racially minoritized patients?
Empirical evidence documents disparities in the diagnosis of severe forms of psychopathology among racial/ethnic minority persons. However, research on diagnostic differences in personality disorders is equivocal: Some suggest higher prevalence of personality disorders among racial/ethnic minority persons, whereas other results suggest the opposite. The goal of the current study was to investigate (a) differences in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a mostly cisgender, heterosexual sample among racial/ethnic minority patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients and (b) whether any observed differences were attributable to differences in underlying maladaptive personality domains. Using data from partial hospital patients (N = 2,657), we found few differences in the diagnosis of BPD based on racial/ethnic group membership. We also conducted measurement invariance analyses of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF), finding evidence of invariance across White and non-White participants in these data. Any instances of diagnostic disparity were explained by group differences in maladaptive personality domains. These results provide context to the extant literature documenting mixed results about racial/ethnic differences in prevalence of personality disorders. In addition, they suggest relative specificity in BPD diagnostic bias related to sexual minority populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).