老年性黄斑变性导致的地理萎缩患者的康复方法以及康复对生活质量的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-07-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/3389750
Damla Erginturk Acar, Figen Batioglu, Aysun Idil, Esra Sahli, Dincer Goksuluk
{"title":"老年性黄斑变性导致的地理萎缩患者的康复方法以及康复对生活质量的影响。","authors":"Damla Erginturk Acar, Figen Batioglu, Aysun Idil, Esra Sahli, Dincer Goksuluk","doi":"10.1155/2023/3389750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study is to evaluate the low vision rehabilitation methods and to investigate the effect of visual rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with low vision due to geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration (ARMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The better-seeing eye of 78 patients with geographic atrophy due to ARMD were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, ophthalmological examination findings, and preferred low vision aids for near and distant were recorded. Fifty-seven patients who preferred to use a low vision aid device in daily life were considered as a rehabilitation group, whereas 21 patients who did not use any device were considered as a control group. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) was applied to all patients at the initial examination and at least 6 months after the initial examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the rehabilitation group, statistically significant increases were found in the overall composite score, and general vision, near and distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, and dependency subscale scores of the NEI-VFQ-25 quality of life scale after low vision rehabilitation (<i>p</i>=0.009 for general vision, <i>p</i> < 0.001; for others). In the control group, there was no statistically significant change in any of the subscale scores or the overall score of the scale (<i>p</i> > 0.05). All patients (<i>n</i> = 78) were recommended to use at least one low vision aid for near vision. Hyperocular glasses were recommended for 77 patients (98.72%), magnifiers for 15 patients (19.23%), electro-optical devices for 2 patients (2.56%), and telemicroscope for one patient (1.28%). Furthermore, 17 patients (21.8%) were prescribed more than one low vision aids. However, for distance vision, only 29 patients (37.18%) received a recommendation for a low vision aid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low vision patients with ARMD-related geographic atrophy should meet with low vision aids as soon as possible and should be included in low vision rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabilitation Methods for Patients with Geographic Atrophy due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Effects of Rehabilitation on Quality of Life.\",\"authors\":\"Damla Erginturk Acar, Figen Batioglu, Aysun Idil, Esra Sahli, Dincer Goksuluk\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/3389750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study is to evaluate the low vision rehabilitation methods and to investigate the effect of visual rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with low vision due to geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration (ARMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The better-seeing eye of 78 patients with geographic atrophy due to ARMD were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, ophthalmological examination findings, and preferred low vision aids for near and distant were recorded. Fifty-seven patients who preferred to use a low vision aid device in daily life were considered as a rehabilitation group, whereas 21 patients who did not use any device were considered as a control group. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) was applied to all patients at the initial examination and at least 6 months after the initial examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the rehabilitation group, statistically significant increases were found in the overall composite score, and general vision, near and distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, and dependency subscale scores of the NEI-VFQ-25 quality of life scale after low vision rehabilitation (<i>p</i>=0.009 for general vision, <i>p</i> < 0.001; for others). In the control group, there was no statistically significant change in any of the subscale scores or the overall score of the scale (<i>p</i> > 0.05). All patients (<i>n</i> = 78) were recommended to use at least one low vision aid for near vision. Hyperocular glasses were recommended for 77 patients (98.72%), magnifiers for 15 patients (19.23%), electro-optical devices for 2 patients (2.56%), and telemicroscope for one patient (1.28%). Furthermore, 17 patients (21.8%) were prescribed more than one low vision aids. However, for distance vision, only 29 patients (37.18%) received a recommendation for a low vision aid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low vision patients with ARMD-related geographic atrophy should meet with low vision aids as soon as possible and should be included in low vision rehabilitation programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10349670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3389750\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3389750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估低视力康复方法,并探讨视觉康复对年龄相关性黄斑变性(ARMD)地理萎缩低视力患者生活质量的影响:方法:研究纳入了78名因年龄相关性黄斑变性(ARMD)导致的地理萎缩患者的较好视力眼。研究记录了患者的社会人口学特征、眼科检查结果以及首选的近距离和远距离低视力助视器。其中 57 名患者选择在日常生活中使用低视力助视器,被视为康复组;21 名患者不使用任何助视器,被视为对照组。所有患者在初次检查时和初次检查后至少 6 个月都接受了美国国家眼科研究所的视觉功能问卷调查(NEI-VFQ-25):结果:康复组患者在接受低视力康复治疗后,生活质量量表(NEI-VFQ-25)中的总体综合得分、一般视力、近距离和远距离活动、社会功能、心理健康、角色困难和依赖性分量表得分均有显著提高(一般视力方面,P=0.009;其他方面,P<0.001)。在对照组中,任何分量表得分或量表总分均无统计学意义上的显著变化(P > 0.05)。所有患者(78 人)都被建议使用至少一种低视力辅助近视眼镜。其中,77 名患者(98.72%)被建议佩戴远视镜,15 名患者(19.23%)被建议佩戴放大镜,2 名患者(2.56%)被建议佩戴电子光学设备,1 名患者(1.28%)被建议佩戴远视镜。此外,有 17 名病人(21.8%)獲處方多於一種低視能輔助儀器。然而,在远视方面,只有 29 名患者(37.18%)获得了低视力助视器的建议:结论:患有 ARMD 相关性地理萎缩的低视力患者应尽快配戴低视力助视器,并将其纳入低视力康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rehabilitation Methods for Patients with Geographic Atrophy due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Effects of Rehabilitation on Quality of Life.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the low vision rehabilitation methods and to investigate the effect of visual rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with low vision due to geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration (ARMD).

Methods: The better-seeing eye of 78 patients with geographic atrophy due to ARMD were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, ophthalmological examination findings, and preferred low vision aids for near and distant were recorded. Fifty-seven patients who preferred to use a low vision aid device in daily life were considered as a rehabilitation group, whereas 21 patients who did not use any device were considered as a control group. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) was applied to all patients at the initial examination and at least 6 months after the initial examination.

Results: In the rehabilitation group, statistically significant increases were found in the overall composite score, and general vision, near and distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, and dependency subscale scores of the NEI-VFQ-25 quality of life scale after low vision rehabilitation (p=0.009 for general vision, p < 0.001; for others). In the control group, there was no statistically significant change in any of the subscale scores or the overall score of the scale (p > 0.05). All patients (n = 78) were recommended to use at least one low vision aid for near vision. Hyperocular glasses were recommended for 77 patients (98.72%), magnifiers for 15 patients (19.23%), electro-optical devices for 2 patients (2.56%), and telemicroscope for one patient (1.28%). Furthermore, 17 patients (21.8%) were prescribed more than one low vision aids. However, for distance vision, only 29 patients (37.18%) received a recommendation for a low vision aid.

Conclusions: Low vision patients with ARMD-related geographic atrophy should meet with low vision aids as soon as possible and should be included in low vision rehabilitation programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信