{"title":"从公共卫生角度探讨对综合护理的理解:范围审查。","authors":"Fadumo Noor, Gabriel Gulis, Leena Eklund Karlsson","doi":"10.1177/22799036231181210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many health care systems attempt to develop an integrated care approach that is a whole population health-oriented system. However, knowledge of strategies to support this effort are scarce and fragmented. The aim of the current paper is to investigate existing concepts of integrated care and their elements from a public health perspective and to propose an elaborated approach that could be applied to explore the public health orientation of integrated care.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We applied a scoping review approach. A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for the period 2000-2020 yielding 16 studies for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the papers, 14 frameworks were identified. Nine of these referred to the Chronic Care Model (CCM). Service delivery, person-centeredness, IT systems design and utilization and decision support were identified as the core elements of most of the included frameworks. The descriptions of these elements were mainly clinical-oriented focusing particularly on clinical care processes and treatment of diseases instead of wider determinants of population health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A synthesized model is proposed that emphasizes the importance of mapping the unique needs and characteristics of the population it aims to serve, leans on the social determinants approach with a commitment to individual and community empowerment, health literacy and suggests reorienting services to meet the expressed needs of the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"12 3","pages":"22799036231181210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/b9/10.1177_22799036231181210.PMC10331197.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of understanding of integrated care from a public health perspective: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Fadumo Noor, Gabriel Gulis, Leena Eklund Karlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036231181210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many health care systems attempt to develop an integrated care approach that is a whole population health-oriented system. However, knowledge of strategies to support this effort are scarce and fragmented. The aim of the current paper is to investigate existing concepts of integrated care and their elements from a public health perspective and to propose an elaborated approach that could be applied to explore the public health orientation of integrated care.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We applied a scoping review approach. A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for the period 2000-2020 yielding 16 studies for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the papers, 14 frameworks were identified. Nine of these referred to the Chronic Care Model (CCM). Service delivery, person-centeredness, IT systems design and utilization and decision support were identified as the core elements of most of the included frameworks. The descriptions of these elements were mainly clinical-oriented focusing particularly on clinical care processes and treatment of diseases instead of wider determinants of population health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A synthesized model is proposed that emphasizes the importance of mapping the unique needs and characteristics of the population it aims to serve, leans on the social determinants approach with a commitment to individual and community empowerment, health literacy and suggests reorienting services to meet the expressed needs of the population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"22799036231181210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/b9/10.1177_22799036231181210.PMC10331197.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231181210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231181210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:许多医疗保健系统都试图开发一种以全民健康为导向的综合护理方法。然而,有关支持这一努力的战略的知识却非常匮乏和零散。本文旨在从公共卫生的角度研究现有的综合医疗概念及其要素,并提出一种可用于探索综合医疗的公共卫生导向的详细方法:我们采用了范围审查法。我们在 Embase、Medline、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中进行了 2000-2020 年期间的文献检索,共纳入了 16 项研究:结果:在所有文献中,共确定了 14 个框架。结果:在所有论文中,共发现了 14 个框架,其中 9 个提到了慢性病护理模式(CCM)。服务提供、以人为本、IT 系统设计和利用以及决策支持被确定为大多数纳入框架的核心要素。对这些要素的描述主要以临床为导向,尤其侧重于临床护理流程和疾病治疗,而不是更广泛的人口健康决定因素:结论:提出了一个综合模式,该模式强调了解其服务对象的独特需求和特征的重要性,采用社会决定因素方法,致力于个人和社区赋权、健康知识普及,并建议调整服务方向以满足人口的明确需求。
Exploration of understanding of integrated care from a public health perspective: A scoping review.
Background: Many health care systems attempt to develop an integrated care approach that is a whole population health-oriented system. However, knowledge of strategies to support this effort are scarce and fragmented. The aim of the current paper is to investigate existing concepts of integrated care and their elements from a public health perspective and to propose an elaborated approach that could be applied to explore the public health orientation of integrated care.
Design and methods: We applied a scoping review approach. A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for the period 2000-2020 yielding 16 studies for inclusion.
Results: Across the papers, 14 frameworks were identified. Nine of these referred to the Chronic Care Model (CCM). Service delivery, person-centeredness, IT systems design and utilization and decision support were identified as the core elements of most of the included frameworks. The descriptions of these elements were mainly clinical-oriented focusing particularly on clinical care processes and treatment of diseases instead of wider determinants of population health.
Conclusions: A synthesized model is proposed that emphasizes the importance of mapping the unique needs and characteristics of the population it aims to serve, leans on the social determinants approach with a commitment to individual and community empowerment, health literacy and suggests reorienting services to meet the expressed needs of the population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.