德国亲子/幼儿心理治疗培训现状研究

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Anna Katharina Georg, Svenja Taubner, Oliver Evers
{"title":"德国亲子/幼儿心理治疗培训现状研究","authors":"Anna Katharina Georg,&nbsp;Svenja Taubner,&nbsp;Oliver Evers","doi":"10.13109/prkk.2023.72.5.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulation disorders in early childhood and postpartum mental disorders of parents can be effectively treated by interventions that involve parents and child (so-called parent-infant psychotherapy, PIP). Availability of PIP in routine care remains low, even though the intervention is in high demand. This study aims to map the current situation of psychotherapy training in PIP in Germany, to record existing obstacles from the perspective of the institutes, and to obtain indications for improving training. Contact persons of training institutes all over Germany were invited to participate in an online survey. N = 95 persons answered questions about possible training in PIP and related advantages and hurdles as well as conditions for a future implementation. Nineteen (22.4 %) of the institutions indicated that PIP was part of their training concept. In 84.2 % of the cases this was aimed at child and adolescent psychotherapists. In 63.6 % of the institutes PIP was treated comprehensively. On average, 2.55 barriers were perceived, most frequently of an organizational nature. 75.9 % of the institutes that did not yet offer PIP would be willing to do so in the future under at least one condition. Among those conditions, information on PIP curricula and specific training content was most frequent (40.7 %).The low implementation of PIP in training seems to be mainly due to barriers of an organizational nature that can be overcome by some simple means, such as the dissemination of model curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":45178,"journal":{"name":"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[On the State of Training in Parent-Infant/Toddler Psychotherapy in Germany].\",\"authors\":\"Anna Katharina Georg,&nbsp;Svenja Taubner,&nbsp;Oliver Evers\",\"doi\":\"10.13109/prkk.2023.72.5.392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Regulation disorders in early childhood and postpartum mental disorders of parents can be effectively treated by interventions that involve parents and child (so-called parent-infant psychotherapy, PIP). Availability of PIP in routine care remains low, even though the intervention is in high demand. This study aims to map the current situation of psychotherapy training in PIP in Germany, to record existing obstacles from the perspective of the institutes, and to obtain indications for improving training. Contact persons of training institutes all over Germany were invited to participate in an online survey. N = 95 persons answered questions about possible training in PIP and related advantages and hurdles as well as conditions for a future implementation. Nineteen (22.4 %) of the institutions indicated that PIP was part of their training concept. In 84.2 % of the cases this was aimed at child and adolescent psychotherapists. In 63.6 % of the institutes PIP was treated comprehensively. On average, 2.55 barriers were perceived, most frequently of an organizational nature. 75.9 % of the institutes that did not yet offer PIP would be willing to do so in the future under at least one condition. Among those conditions, information on PIP curricula and specific training content was most frequent (40.7 %).The low implementation of PIP in training seems to be mainly due to barriers of an organizational nature that can be overcome by some simple means, such as the dissemination of model curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2023.72.5.392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2023.72.5.392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

幼儿期调节障碍和父母产后精神障碍可以通过涉及父母和孩子的干预措施(所谓的亲子心理治疗,PIP)得到有效治疗。尽管干预需求很大,但PIP在常规护理中的可用性仍然很低。本研究旨在绘制德国PIP心理治疗培训的现状,从机构的角度记录存在的障碍,并获得改进培训的指示。邀请德国各地培训机构的联系人参与在线调查。N = 95人回答了关于可能的PIP培训、相关优势和障碍以及未来实施条件的问题。19所院校(22.4%)表示,PIP是其培训概念的一部分。在84.2%的案例中,这是针对儿童和青少年心理治疗师的。63.6%的医院对PIP进行了综合治疗。平均有2.55个障碍被察觉,最常见的是组织性质的障碍。75.9%尚未提供PIP的学院在至少一个条件下愿意在未来提供PIP。在这些条件中,有关PIP课程和具体培训内容的信息最为常见(40.7%)。培训方面执行和平执行方案的程度较低似乎主要是由于组织性质的障碍,这些障碍可以通过一些简单的手段克服,例如传播示范课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[On the State of Training in Parent-Infant/Toddler Psychotherapy in Germany].

Regulation disorders in early childhood and postpartum mental disorders of parents can be effectively treated by interventions that involve parents and child (so-called parent-infant psychotherapy, PIP). Availability of PIP in routine care remains low, even though the intervention is in high demand. This study aims to map the current situation of psychotherapy training in PIP in Germany, to record existing obstacles from the perspective of the institutes, and to obtain indications for improving training. Contact persons of training institutes all over Germany were invited to participate in an online survey. N = 95 persons answered questions about possible training in PIP and related advantages and hurdles as well as conditions for a future implementation. Nineteen (22.4 %) of the institutions indicated that PIP was part of their training concept. In 84.2 % of the cases this was aimed at child and adolescent psychotherapists. In 63.6 % of the institutes PIP was treated comprehensively. On average, 2.55 barriers were perceived, most frequently of an organizational nature. 75.9 % of the institutes that did not yet offer PIP would be willing to do so in the future under at least one condition. Among those conditions, information on PIP curricula and specific training content was most frequent (40.7 %).The low implementation of PIP in training seems to be mainly due to barriers of an organizational nature that can be overcome by some simple means, such as the dissemination of model curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Beiträge aus Praxis und Forschung, die sich mit Störungen der Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen sowie deren psychotherapeutischer Behandlung beschäftigen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信