Antonio Izzo, Arianna Sgadari, Antonio Coviello, Francesco Smeraglia, Giovanni Balato, Massimo Mariconda, Alessio Bernasconi
{"title":"螺钉数量对踝关节融合术愈合率有影响吗?荟萃分析和系统评价。","authors":"Antonio Izzo, Arianna Sgadari, Antonio Coviello, Francesco Smeraglia, Giovanni Balato, Massimo Mariconda, Alessio Bernasconi","doi":"10.1177/19386400231171508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether the number of cannulated screws used during ankle arthrodesis (AA) might influence the union and complication rate.MethodsIn this Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant PROSPERO-registered systematic review, multiple databases were searched including studies in which patients undergone AA using cannulated screws as exclusive fixation method were followed. Data were harvested regarding the cohort, the study design, the surgical technique, the nonunion, and complication rate at the longest follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). Two groups were built (arthrodeses fixed with 2 screws [group 1, G1] vs arthrodeses fixed with 3 screws [group 2 G2]) and compared.ResultsFifteen series of patients from 15 studies (667 ankles) were selected (G1 = 458 ankles and G2 = 209). The pooled proportion estimate revealed a similar nonunion rate in the 2-screw group as compared with the 3-screw group (4% vs 3%; P = .68). The pooled proportion of complications was higher in G1 (19%) than in G2 (8%), but it was not significantly different either (P = .45). After exclusion of \"symptomatic hardware and screw removal,\" the difference was still not significant (P = .28) although it resulted lower in G1 than in G2 (4% vs 8%, respectively).ConclusionsUsing 3 cannulated screws during AA as compared with a 2-screw construct does not significantly reduce the risk of nonunion nor the risk of complications.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Systematic review of level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"464-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Number of Screws Influence the Union Rate in Ankle Arthrodesis? A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Izzo, Arianna Sgadari, Antonio Coviello, Francesco Smeraglia, Giovanni Balato, Massimo Mariconda, Alessio Bernasconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19386400231171508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether the number of cannulated screws used during ankle arthrodesis (AA) might influence the union and complication rate.MethodsIn this Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant PROSPERO-registered systematic review, multiple databases were searched including studies in which patients undergone AA using cannulated screws as exclusive fixation method were followed. Data were harvested regarding the cohort, the study design, the surgical technique, the nonunion, and complication rate at the longest follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). Two groups were built (arthrodeses fixed with 2 screws [group 1, G1] vs arthrodeses fixed with 3 screws [group 2 G2]) and compared.ResultsFifteen series of patients from 15 studies (667 ankles) were selected (G1 = 458 ankles and G2 = 209). The pooled proportion estimate revealed a similar nonunion rate in the 2-screw group as compared with the 3-screw group (4% vs 3%; P = .68). The pooled proportion of complications was higher in G1 (19%) than in G2 (8%), but it was not significantly different either (P = .45). After exclusion of \\\"symptomatic hardware and screw removal,\\\" the difference was still not significant (P = .28) although it resulted lower in G1 than in G2 (4% vs 8%, respectively).ConclusionsUsing 3 cannulated screws during AA as compared with a 2-screw construct does not significantly reduce the risk of nonunion nor the risk of complications.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Systematic review of level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"464-473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400231171508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400231171508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨在踝关节融合术(AA)中使用空心螺钉的数量对关节愈合及并发症发生率的影响。方法在本系统评价和meta分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)符合普洛斯罗注册的系统评价中,检索了多个数据库,包括采用空心螺钉作为唯一固定方法接受AA治疗的患者的研究。收集有关队列、研究设计、手术技术、骨不连和最长随访时并发症发生率的数据。采用改良的Coleman方法学评分(mCMS)评估偏倚风险。建立两组(2螺钉固定组[1组,G1]与3螺钉固定组[2组,G2])进行比较。结果从15项研究中选取15组患者(667例踝关节),G1 = 458例,G2 = 209例。合并比例估计显示2螺钉组与3螺钉组的骨不连率相似(4% vs 3%; P = 0.68)。并发症合并比例G1组(19%)高于G2组(8%),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.45)。在排除“有症状的内固定和螺钉取出”后,尽管G1组比G2组低(分别为4%和8%),但差异仍然不显著(P = 0.28)。结论与2枚空心螺钉相比,使用3枚空心螺钉并没有显著降低骨不连和并发症的风险。证据等级:IV级,IV级的系统评价。
Does the Number of Screws Influence the Union Rate in Ankle Arthrodesis? A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether the number of cannulated screws used during ankle arthrodesis (AA) might influence the union and complication rate.MethodsIn this Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant PROSPERO-registered systematic review, multiple databases were searched including studies in which patients undergone AA using cannulated screws as exclusive fixation method were followed. Data were harvested regarding the cohort, the study design, the surgical technique, the nonunion, and complication rate at the longest follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). Two groups were built (arthrodeses fixed with 2 screws [group 1, G1] vs arthrodeses fixed with 3 screws [group 2 G2]) and compared.ResultsFifteen series of patients from 15 studies (667 ankles) were selected (G1 = 458 ankles and G2 = 209). The pooled proportion estimate revealed a similar nonunion rate in the 2-screw group as compared with the 3-screw group (4% vs 3%; P = .68). The pooled proportion of complications was higher in G1 (19%) than in G2 (8%), but it was not significantly different either (P = .45). After exclusion of "symptomatic hardware and screw removal," the difference was still not significant (P = .28) although it resulted lower in G1 than in G2 (4% vs 8%, respectively).ConclusionsUsing 3 cannulated screws during AA as compared with a 2-screw construct does not significantly reduce the risk of nonunion nor the risk of complications.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Systematic review of level IV.