UN ETEROCLITO BABUINO: On Giordano Bruno's Candelaio and the Infinitization of the Sexes.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Homosexuality Pub Date : 2024-07-28 Epub Date: 2023-07-05 DOI:10.1080/00918369.2023.2221142
J Edgar Bauer
{"title":"UN ETEROCLITO BABUINO: On Giordano Bruno's Candelaio and the Infinitization of the Sexes.","authors":"J Edgar Bauer","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2023.2221142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Giordano Bruno (Nola 1548 - Rome 1600) published in 1582 <i>Candelaio</i>, a comedy that anticipates the core arguments he developed in the six dialogs written <i>in volgare</i> during the philosopher's stay in England (1583-1585). In the comedy, the term <i>candelaio</i> (candlebearer) is deployed not only as a trope for light and illumination, but also as a slang designation for sodomite. Thus, sexual dissident Bonifacio, the tragicomic personage to which the title refers, brings to light the mostly unavowed or denigrated, albeit ineradicable complexities of every sexual individuality. In this framework, the personality, lifestyle, and views of disruptive Bonifacio/Candelaio serve as narrative support for a critical stance aiming at undoing the validity claims of the man/woman dichotomy. At the antipodes of the finitization of sexuality fostered by Christian creationism, Bruno's sexual approach is framed within a conception of \"natura naturante,\" the all-pervasive, inexhaustible and animating power, which enables the emergence of utterly diversified beings throughout the infinitude of the existing worlds. Having dismantled the epistemic pretentions of sexual binarity and its possible closed supplementations, Bruno effectively frees Bonifacio's sexual heteroclisis from the stigma of unnaturalness. Notwithstanding the trailblazing traits of Bruno's sexual thought and its ontological framework, Brunian scholarship to the present has ignored that the philosopher from Nola posed the arguably most profound and consistent challenge to binary sexuality and its finite suppletions in pre-Darwinian Modernity. In view of the critiques of patriarchy and anti-feminism that began to develop at the turn to the twentieth century, it is striking that no systematic effort has been undertaken to relate Bruno's principled reversion of the form/matter hierarchy to his advocacy for the axiological restauration of femaleness in the masculinist-centered culture of the West. In accordance with Bruno's explicit design to \"turn upside down the reversed world,\" his philosophy seeks to reveal the endless profusion of sexual forms not as creations of an omnipotent paternal figure, but as emergences from an inexhaustible source, which he signally terms \"the maternal womb of Nature.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>UN ETEROCLITO BABUINO</i>: On Giordano Bruno's <i>Candelaio</i> and the Infinitization of the Sexes.\",\"authors\":\"J Edgar Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2023.2221142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Giordano Bruno (Nola 1548 - Rome 1600) published in 1582 <i>Candelaio</i>, a comedy that anticipates the core arguments he developed in the six dialogs written <i>in volgare</i> during the philosopher's stay in England (1583-1585). In the comedy, the term <i>candelaio</i> (candlebearer) is deployed not only as a trope for light and illumination, but also as a slang designation for sodomite. Thus, sexual dissident Bonifacio, the tragicomic personage to which the title refers, brings to light the mostly unavowed or denigrated, albeit ineradicable complexities of every sexual individuality. In this framework, the personality, lifestyle, and views of disruptive Bonifacio/Candelaio serve as narrative support for a critical stance aiming at undoing the validity claims of the man/woman dichotomy. At the antipodes of the finitization of sexuality fostered by Christian creationism, Bruno's sexual approach is framed within a conception of \\\"natura naturante,\\\" the all-pervasive, inexhaustible and animating power, which enables the emergence of utterly diversified beings throughout the infinitude of the existing worlds. Having dismantled the epistemic pretentions of sexual binarity and its possible closed supplementations, Bruno effectively frees Bonifacio's sexual heteroclisis from the stigma of unnaturalness. Notwithstanding the trailblazing traits of Bruno's sexual thought and its ontological framework, Brunian scholarship to the present has ignored that the philosopher from Nola posed the arguably most profound and consistent challenge to binary sexuality and its finite suppletions in pre-Darwinian Modernity. In view of the critiques of patriarchy and anti-feminism that began to develop at the turn to the twentieth century, it is striking that no systematic effort has been undertaken to relate Bruno's principled reversion of the form/matter hierarchy to his advocacy for the axiological restauration of femaleness in the masculinist-centered culture of the West. In accordance with Bruno's explicit design to \\\"turn upside down the reversed world,\\\" his philosophy seeks to reveal the endless profusion of sexual forms not as creations of an omnipotent paternal figure, but as emergences from an inexhaustible source, which he signally terms \\\"the maternal womb of Nature.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2023.2221142\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2023.2221142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乔尔丹诺-布鲁诺(1548 年出生于诺拉,1600 年出生于罗马)于 1582 年出版了喜剧《烛台》,这部喜剧预示了他在英国逗留期间(1583-1585 年)用伏尔加语撰写的六篇对话中提出的核心论点。在这部喜剧中,"烛台"(candelaio)一词不仅被用作光明和照明的特例,还被用作鸡奸者的俚语。因此,标题所指的性异议者博尼法西奥(Bonifacio)这个悲喜剧人物,揭示了每一个性个体的复杂性,尽管这些复杂性是不可磨灭的,但却大多不为人知或遭到诋毁。在这一框架下,具有破坏性的博尼法西奥/坎德雷奥的个性、生活方式和观点为一种批判立场提供了叙事支持,这种批判立场旨在推翻男人/女人二分法的有效性主张。与基督教创世论所提倡的性的有限性截然相反,布鲁诺的性研究方法是以 "自然 "这一概念为框架的。"自然 "是一种无处不在、取之不尽、用之不竭的生生不息的力量,它使得在无穷无尽的现存世界中出现了完全不同的生命。布鲁诺打破了性二元性及其可能的封闭性补充的认识论伪装,有效地将博尼法乔的性异质性从非自然性的污名中解放出来。尽管布鲁诺的性思想及其本体论框架具有开拓性特征,但迄今为止的布鲁诺学术研究却忽视了这位来自诺拉的哲学家对达尔文现代性之前的二元性及其有限补充提出了可以说是最深刻、最一致的挑战。鉴于二十世纪之交开始出现的对父权制和反女性主义的批判,令人震惊的是,没有人系统地将布鲁诺对形式/物质等级的原则性还原与他在西方以男性主义为中心的文化中倡导恢复女性的公理联系起来。按照布鲁诺 "颠倒颠倒世界 "的明确设计,他的哲学试图揭示无穷无尽的性形式不是全能的父性形象的创造物,而是取之不尽用之不竭的源泉,他明确地称之为 "大自然的母性子宫"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UN ETEROCLITO BABUINO: On Giordano Bruno's Candelaio and the Infinitization of the Sexes.

Giordano Bruno (Nola 1548 - Rome 1600) published in 1582 Candelaio, a comedy that anticipates the core arguments he developed in the six dialogs written in volgare during the philosopher's stay in England (1583-1585). In the comedy, the term candelaio (candlebearer) is deployed not only as a trope for light and illumination, but also as a slang designation for sodomite. Thus, sexual dissident Bonifacio, the tragicomic personage to which the title refers, brings to light the mostly unavowed or denigrated, albeit ineradicable complexities of every sexual individuality. In this framework, the personality, lifestyle, and views of disruptive Bonifacio/Candelaio serve as narrative support for a critical stance aiming at undoing the validity claims of the man/woman dichotomy. At the antipodes of the finitization of sexuality fostered by Christian creationism, Bruno's sexual approach is framed within a conception of "natura naturante," the all-pervasive, inexhaustible and animating power, which enables the emergence of utterly diversified beings throughout the infinitude of the existing worlds. Having dismantled the epistemic pretentions of sexual binarity and its possible closed supplementations, Bruno effectively frees Bonifacio's sexual heteroclisis from the stigma of unnaturalness. Notwithstanding the trailblazing traits of Bruno's sexual thought and its ontological framework, Brunian scholarship to the present has ignored that the philosopher from Nola posed the arguably most profound and consistent challenge to binary sexuality and its finite suppletions in pre-Darwinian Modernity. In view of the critiques of patriarchy and anti-feminism that began to develop at the turn to the twentieth century, it is striking that no systematic effort has been undertaken to relate Bruno's principled reversion of the form/matter hierarchy to his advocacy for the axiological restauration of femaleness in the masculinist-centered culture of the West. In accordance with Bruno's explicit design to "turn upside down the reversed world," his philosophy seeks to reveal the endless profusion of sexual forms not as creations of an omnipotent paternal figure, but as emergences from an inexhaustible source, which he signally terms "the maternal womb of Nature."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信