认知补救的学习原则与早期精神病患者认知和职业结果之间的关系——一项对RCT数据的探索性分析。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-13 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2023.2199935
Daniëlle van Duin, Lars de Winter, Hans Kroon, Wim Veling, Jaap van Weeghel
{"title":"认知补救的学习原则与早期精神病患者认知和职业结果之间的关系——一项对RCT数据的探索性分析。","authors":"Daniëlle van Duin, Lars de Winter, Hans Kroon, Wim Veling, Jaap van Weeghel","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2023.2199935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most cognitive remediation (CR) programs are based on multiple scientific learning principles. The role of those learning principles in the beneficial effects of CR is poorly understood. A better understanding of such underlying mechanisms is important to further tailor the intervention and to learn about optimal contexts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An explorative secondary analysis was conducted of data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with and without CR. The present study evaluated how CR learning principles of \"massed practice,\" \"errorless learning,\" \"strategy use\" and \"therapist contribution\" (therapist fidelity) were associated with cognitive and vocational outcomes within 26 participants in this RCT who were treatment exposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive gains after CR were positively associated with \"massed practice\" and \"errorless learning.\" Negative associations were found with \"strategy use\" and \"therapist fidelity.\" No direct relationship was found between CR principles and vocational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results tentatively suggest that CR is most effective and efficient with a good balance between sufficient intensity, of more than 200 tasks, and a limited duration of the training up to 20 h, using tasks that remain both challenging and rewarding, being applied in a context that facilitates real-life practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"628-638"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between learning principles of cognitive remediation and cognitive and vocational outcomes in early psychosis-an exploratory analysis of RCT data.\",\"authors\":\"Daniëlle van Duin, Lars de Winter, Hans Kroon, Wim Veling, Jaap van Weeghel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2023.2199935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most cognitive remediation (CR) programs are based on multiple scientific learning principles. The role of those learning principles in the beneficial effects of CR is poorly understood. A better understanding of such underlying mechanisms is important to further tailor the intervention and to learn about optimal contexts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An explorative secondary analysis was conducted of data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with and without CR. The present study evaluated how CR learning principles of \\\"massed practice,\\\" \\\"errorless learning,\\\" \\\"strategy use\\\" and \\\"therapist contribution\\\" (therapist fidelity) were associated with cognitive and vocational outcomes within 26 participants in this RCT who were treatment exposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive gains after CR were positively associated with \\\"massed practice\\\" and \\\"errorless learning.\\\" Negative associations were found with \\\"strategy use\\\" and \\\"therapist fidelity.\\\" No direct relationship was found between CR principles and vocational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results tentatively suggest that CR is most effective and efficient with a good balance between sufficient intensity, of more than 200 tasks, and a limited duration of the training up to 20 h, using tasks that remain both challenging and rewarding, being applied in a context that facilitates real-life practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"628-638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2199935\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2199935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数认知补救(CR)项目是基于多种科学的学习原则。这些学习原则在CR的有益效果中的作用尚不清楚。更好地理解这种潜在机制对于进一步调整干预措施和了解最佳环境非常重要。方法:对随机对照试验(RCT)的数据进行探索性二次分析,比较了个体安置和支持(IPS)在有和没有CR的情况下的效果,本研究评估了26名接受治疗的参与者的CR学习原则“群体实践”、“无错误学习”、“策略使用”和“治疗师贡献”(治疗师忠诚)与认知和职业结果的关系。结果:CR后的认知增益与“大量练习”和“无错误学习”呈正相关。“策略使用”和“治疗师忠诚”呈负相关。社会责任原则与职业结果之间无直接关系。结论:结果初步表明,在200多个任务的足够强度和20小时的有限训练时间之间取得良好平衡时,CR是最有效和高效的,使用既具有挑战性又有回报的任务,并在促进现实生活实践的背景下应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between learning principles of cognitive remediation and cognitive and vocational outcomes in early psychosis-an exploratory analysis of RCT data.

Background: Most cognitive remediation (CR) programs are based on multiple scientific learning principles. The role of those learning principles in the beneficial effects of CR is poorly understood. A better understanding of such underlying mechanisms is important to further tailor the intervention and to learn about optimal contexts.

Method: An explorative secondary analysis was conducted of data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) with and without CR. The present study evaluated how CR learning principles of "massed practice," "errorless learning," "strategy use" and "therapist contribution" (therapist fidelity) were associated with cognitive and vocational outcomes within 26 participants in this RCT who were treatment exposed.

Results: Cognitive gains after CR were positively associated with "massed practice" and "errorless learning." Negative associations were found with "strategy use" and "therapist fidelity." No direct relationship was found between CR principles and vocational outcomes.

Conclusions: Results tentatively suggest that CR is most effective and efficient with a good balance between sufficient intensity, of more than 200 tasks, and a limited duration of the training up to 20 h, using tasks that remain both challenging and rewarding, being applied in a context that facilitates real-life practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信