Lenstar LS900 vs EchoScan US-800:带和不带隐形眼镜的光学和超声生物识别的比较及其与其他生物识别参数的关系。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Veronica Noya-Padin, Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga, Maria Iacubitchii, Maria J Giraldez, Eva Yebra-Pimentel, Hugo Pena-Verdeal
{"title":"Lenstar LS900 vs EchoScan US-800:带和不带隐形眼镜的光学和超声生物识别的比较及其与其他生物识别参数的关系。","authors":"Veronica Noya-Padin,&nbsp;Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga,&nbsp;Maria Iacubitchii,&nbsp;Maria J Giraldez,&nbsp;Eva Yebra-Pimentel,&nbsp;Hugo Pena-Verdeal","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2233410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the increasing use of contact lenses (CL) and the interest in ocular and body size relationships, this study aimed to compare measurements from two biometers (contact ultrasonic EchoScan US-800 and non-contact optical Lenstar LS900) with and without CL and to explore the relationship between ocular and body biometric parameters.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study measured ocular biometry using two biometers along with their body height and right foot length in 50 participants. Differences between biometry data from the two devices were compared and correlations between ocular and body biometric values were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All parameters showed interbiometric differences (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.030), except crystalline lens thickness during CL wear (<i>p</i> = 0.159). Comparing measurements with and without CL, differences were observed in axial length (<i>p</i> < 0.001), vitreous length measured by optical biometer (<i>p</i> = 0.016), and anterior chamber depth by ultrasonic biometer (<i>p</i> < 0.016). Lens thickness remained unaffected (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.190). Body height and foot length were correlated with anterior chamber depth, vitreous length, and axial length (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.019, <i>r</i> ≥ 0.330). Most biometric parameters were correlated among them using both devices (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.037, <i>r</i> ≥ 0.296).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These biometers are not interchangeable and CL affects measurements. Body height and foot length correlate with ocular dimensions, and most ocular biometric values correlate positively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12330,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lenstar LS900 vs EchoScan US-800: comparison between optical and ultrasound biometry with and without contact lenses and its relationship with other biometric parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Noya-Padin,&nbsp;Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga,&nbsp;Maria Iacubitchii,&nbsp;Maria J Giraldez,&nbsp;Eva Yebra-Pimentel,&nbsp;Hugo Pena-Verdeal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2023.2233410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the increasing use of contact lenses (CL) and the interest in ocular and body size relationships, this study aimed to compare measurements from two biometers (contact ultrasonic EchoScan US-800 and non-contact optical Lenstar LS900) with and without CL and to explore the relationship between ocular and body biometric parameters.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study measured ocular biometry using two biometers along with their body height and right foot length in 50 participants. Differences between biometry data from the two devices were compared and correlations between ocular and body biometric values were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All parameters showed interbiometric differences (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.030), except crystalline lens thickness during CL wear (<i>p</i> = 0.159). Comparing measurements with and without CL, differences were observed in axial length (<i>p</i> < 0.001), vitreous length measured by optical biometer (<i>p</i> = 0.016), and anterior chamber depth by ultrasonic biometer (<i>p</i> < 0.016). Lens thickness remained unaffected (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.190). Body height and foot length were correlated with anterior chamber depth, vitreous length, and axial length (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.019, <i>r</i> ≥ 0.330). Most biometric parameters were correlated among them using both devices (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.037, <i>r</i> ≥ 0.296).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These biometers are not interchangeable and CL affects measurements. Body height and foot length correlate with ocular dimensions, and most ocular biometric values correlate positively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2233410\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2233410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:由于隐形眼镜(CL)的使用越来越多,人们对眼睛和身体尺寸之间的关系越来越感兴趣,本研究旨在比较两种生物计(接触式超声EchoScan US-800和非接触式光学Lenstar LS900)在使用和不使用CL时的测量结果,并探讨眼睛和身体生物特征参数之间的关系。设计和方法:本横断面研究使用两个生物计测量了50名参与者的眼生物特征以及他们的身高和右脚长度。比较了两种设备的生物特征数据的差异,并分析了眼部和身体生物特征值之间的相关性。结果:除晶状体磨损时晶状体厚度差异(p = 0.159)外,其余参数均存在生物统计学差异(p≤0.030)。超声生物计测量的轴长(p = 0.016)和前房深度(p≥0.190)与未加CL的测量结果比较,差异有统计学意义。体高、足长与前房深度、玻璃体长度、眼轴长度相关(p≤0.019,r≥0.330)。使用两种设备时,大多数生物特征参数之间存在相关性(p≤0.037,r≥0.296)。结论:这些生物计不可互换,CL影响测量。身高和脚长与眼部尺寸相关,大多数眼部生物特征值呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lenstar LS900 vs EchoScan US-800: comparison between optical and ultrasound biometry with and without contact lenses and its relationship with other biometric parameters.

Background: Due to the increasing use of contact lenses (CL) and the interest in ocular and body size relationships, this study aimed to compare measurements from two biometers (contact ultrasonic EchoScan US-800 and non-contact optical Lenstar LS900) with and without CL and to explore the relationship between ocular and body biometric parameters.

Design and methods: This cross-sectional study measured ocular biometry using two biometers along with their body height and right foot length in 50 participants. Differences between biometry data from the two devices were compared and correlations between ocular and body biometric values were analyzed.

Results: All parameters showed interbiometric differences (p ≤ 0.030), except crystalline lens thickness during CL wear (p = 0.159). Comparing measurements with and without CL, differences were observed in axial length (p < 0.001), vitreous length measured by optical biometer (p = 0.016), and anterior chamber depth by ultrasonic biometer (p < 0.016). Lens thickness remained unaffected (p ≥ 0.190). Body height and foot length were correlated with anterior chamber depth, vitreous length, and axial length (p ≤ 0.019, r ≥ 0.330). Most biometric parameters were correlated among them using both devices (p ≤ 0.037, r ≥ 0.296).

Conclusions: These biometers are not interchangeable and CL affects measurements. Body height and foot length correlate with ocular dimensions, and most ocular biometric values correlate positively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Expert Review of Medical Devices 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections: Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信