[创伤和创伤后应激障碍的动物模型]。

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Karim Benchenane
{"title":"[创伤和创伤后应激障碍的动物模型]。","authors":"Karim Benchenane","doi":"10.1051/jbio/2023022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Initially believed to be specific to humans emerging from life-threatening events, Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been found to occur in wild animals and can also be experimentally induced in laboratory rodents. This article aims to highlight and discuss the evolution and relevance of animal models in PTSD research. Studies by LeDoux, Davis, and McGaugh have made significant contributions to our understanding of PTSD. By focusing on fear responses in rodents and aversive Pavlovian conditioning, they suggested that PTSD could result from excessively efficient aversive learning processes, with a significant role played by amygdala. However, numerous studies have shown that this explanation fails to account for the complexity of processes involved in PTSD. Current hypotheses focus on deficits in extinction retention, perception of safety signals, or emotional regulation. This review will specifically address the animal models that closely resemble human PTSD and explore reasons for their limited utilization, as a majority of animal studies continues to employ classical Pavlovian conditioning protocols. Furthermore, this review will present cutting-edge experimental studies that tackle previously challenging questions in animal research. Specifically, we will examine the relationship between respiration and the maintenance of fear states, offering a potential explanation for the efficacy of meditation and breath control techniques in emotion regulation. We will also shed light on recent findings on decoding neural activity related to internal representations in animals, thus enabling now the exploration of rumination, a characteristic symptom of PTSD previously inaccessible to animal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":39068,"journal":{"name":"Biologie Aujourd''hui","volume":"217 1-2","pages":"89-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Animal models of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder].\",\"authors\":\"Karim Benchenane\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/jbio/2023022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Initially believed to be specific to humans emerging from life-threatening events, Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been found to occur in wild animals and can also be experimentally induced in laboratory rodents. This article aims to highlight and discuss the evolution and relevance of animal models in PTSD research. Studies by LeDoux, Davis, and McGaugh have made significant contributions to our understanding of PTSD. By focusing on fear responses in rodents and aversive Pavlovian conditioning, they suggested that PTSD could result from excessively efficient aversive learning processes, with a significant role played by amygdala. However, numerous studies have shown that this explanation fails to account for the complexity of processes involved in PTSD. Current hypotheses focus on deficits in extinction retention, perception of safety signals, or emotional regulation. This review will specifically address the animal models that closely resemble human PTSD and explore reasons for their limited utilization, as a majority of animal studies continues to employ classical Pavlovian conditioning protocols. Furthermore, this review will present cutting-edge experimental studies that tackle previously challenging questions in animal research. Specifically, we will examine the relationship between respiration and the maintenance of fear states, offering a potential explanation for the efficacy of meditation and breath control techniques in emotion regulation. We will also shed light on recent findings on decoding neural activity related to internal representations in animals, thus enabling now the exploration of rumination, a characteristic symptom of PTSD previously inaccessible to animal studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biologie Aujourd''hui\",\"volume\":\"217 1-2\",\"pages\":\"89-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biologie Aujourd''hui\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2023022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologie Aujourd''hui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2023022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)最初被认为是人类从危及生命的事件中出现的特异性疾病,现已发现发生在野生动物身上,也可以在实验室啮齿类动物身上实验诱发。本文旨在强调和讨论动物模型在PTSD研究中的演变及其相关性。LeDoux、Davis和McGaugh的研究对我们理解创伤后应激障碍做出了重大贡献。通过关注啮齿动物的恐惧反应和厌恶的巴甫洛夫条件反射,他们认为创伤后应激障碍可能是由于过度高效的厌恶学习过程造成的,杏仁核在其中发挥了重要作用。然而,大量的研究表明,这种解释无法解释创伤后应激障碍所涉及的过程的复杂性。目前的假设集中在消退保留、安全信号感知或情绪调节方面的缺陷。这篇综述将特别讨论与人类创伤后应激障碍非常相似的动物模型,并探讨其应用有限的原因,因为大多数动物研究仍然使用经典的巴甫洛夫条件反射协议。此外,本综述将介绍解决动物研究中先前具有挑战性的问题的前沿实验研究。具体来说,我们将研究呼吸和恐惧状态维持之间的关系,为冥想和呼吸控制技术在情绪调节中的功效提供一个潜在的解释。我们还将阐明最近在解码与动物内部表征相关的神经活动方面的发现,从而使现在能够探索反刍,这是以前无法在动物研究中获得的创伤后应激障碍的特征症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Animal models of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder].

Initially believed to be specific to humans emerging from life-threatening events, Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been found to occur in wild animals and can also be experimentally induced in laboratory rodents. This article aims to highlight and discuss the evolution and relevance of animal models in PTSD research. Studies by LeDoux, Davis, and McGaugh have made significant contributions to our understanding of PTSD. By focusing on fear responses in rodents and aversive Pavlovian conditioning, they suggested that PTSD could result from excessively efficient aversive learning processes, with a significant role played by amygdala. However, numerous studies have shown that this explanation fails to account for the complexity of processes involved in PTSD. Current hypotheses focus on deficits in extinction retention, perception of safety signals, or emotional regulation. This review will specifically address the animal models that closely resemble human PTSD and explore reasons for their limited utilization, as a majority of animal studies continues to employ classical Pavlovian conditioning protocols. Furthermore, this review will present cutting-edge experimental studies that tackle previously challenging questions in animal research. Specifically, we will examine the relationship between respiration and the maintenance of fear states, offering a potential explanation for the efficacy of meditation and breath control techniques in emotion regulation. We will also shed light on recent findings on decoding neural activity related to internal representations in animals, thus enabling now the exploration of rumination, a characteristic symptom of PTSD previously inaccessible to animal studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biologie Aujourd''hui
Biologie Aujourd''hui Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信