Mitomycin-C在喉气管狭窄中的应用:一项重点临床综述。

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Christopher Di Felice, Michael S Machuzak, Ray W Shepherd
{"title":"Mitomycin-C在喉气管狭窄中的应用:一项重点临床综述。","authors":"Christopher Di Felice,&nbsp;Michael S Machuzak,&nbsp;Ray W Shepherd","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic options for managing laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) are limited. Endoscopy is a minimally invasive approach to treating LTS, but carries a high risk of stenosis recurrence. Mitomycin C (MMC) is often used as an adjunct therapy to delay the time to symptomatic recurrence of LTS. This review synthesizes the current literature on the topic of MMC as an adjunct treatment strategy for LTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focused literature search was carried out from PubMed on June 12, 2022 using the terms \"mitomycin c AND stenosis\" in all fields with no date limitations. Evidence-based recommendations relevant to the clinical application of MMC as an adjunct therapy for LTS were formulated. Three questions were addressed: 1) efficacy of MMC, 2) single versus multiple application(s) of MMC, and 3) safety of MMC. The evidence rating and recommendation strength were guided by the GRADE system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies were reviewed. The efficacy of MMC as an adjunct therapy for LTS varied across studies. Randomized controlled trials have not shown an outcome difference with MMC use, although methodologic flaws including underpowering were noted. A meta-analysis of observational studies with a comparator arm found the unadjusted probability of remaining symptom-free for > 1 year is greater with versus without MMC application (73% vs. 35%). Single versus multiple application(s) of MMC resulted in similar restenosis rates at long-term follow-up. Complications related to MMC use are rarely reported using conventional doses (0.4 mg/mL). Overall, the quality of evidence was low and the recommendation for intervention was weak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role for MMC as an adjunct therapy in LTS is uncertain. While safe in its application, the efficacy of MMC in reducing stenosis recurrence remains a matter of debate. Large, prospective studies are needed to inform future recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Mitomycin-C in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: A Focused Clinical Review.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Di Felice,&nbsp;Michael S Machuzak,&nbsp;Ray W Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic options for managing laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) are limited. Endoscopy is a minimally invasive approach to treating LTS, but carries a high risk of stenosis recurrence. Mitomycin C (MMC) is often used as an adjunct therapy to delay the time to symptomatic recurrence of LTS. This review synthesizes the current literature on the topic of MMC as an adjunct treatment strategy for LTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focused literature search was carried out from PubMed on June 12, 2022 using the terms \\\"mitomycin c AND stenosis\\\" in all fields with no date limitations. Evidence-based recommendations relevant to the clinical application of MMC as an adjunct therapy for LTS were formulated. Three questions were addressed: 1) efficacy of MMC, 2) single versus multiple application(s) of MMC, and 3) safety of MMC. The evidence rating and recommendation strength were guided by the GRADE system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies were reviewed. The efficacy of MMC as an adjunct therapy for LTS varied across studies. Randomized controlled trials have not shown an outcome difference with MMC use, although methodologic flaws including underpowering were noted. A meta-analysis of observational studies with a comparator arm found the unadjusted probability of remaining symptom-free for > 1 year is greater with versus without MMC application (73% vs. 35%). Single versus multiple application(s) of MMC resulted in similar restenosis rates at long-term follow-up. Complications related to MMC use are rarely reported using conventional doses (0.4 mg/mL). Overall, the quality of evidence was low and the recommendation for intervention was weak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role for MMC as an adjunct therapy in LTS is uncertain. While safe in its application, the efficacy of MMC in reducing stenosis recurrence remains a matter of debate. Large, prospective studies are needed to inform future recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:治疗喉气管狭窄的选择是有限的。内窥镜是一种微创的治疗LTS的方法,但有很高的狭窄复发风险。丝裂霉素C(MMC)通常被用作辅助治疗,以延迟LTS症状复发的时间。这篇综述综合了目前关于MMC作为LTS辅助治疗策略的文献。方法:2022年6月12日,在PubMed进行了一项重点文献检索,在所有领域使用术语“丝裂霉素c和狭窄”,没有日期限制。制定了与MMC作为LTS辅助治疗的临床应用相关的循证建议。讨论了三个问题:1)MMC的疗效,2)MMC的单次应用与多次应用,以及3)MMC的安全性。证据评级和推荐强度以GRADE系统为指导。结果:回顾了29项研究。MMC作为LTS辅助治疗的疗效因研究而异。随机对照试验没有显示MMC使用的结果差异,尽管注意到了包括动力不足在内的方法学缺陷。一项对对照组观察性研究的荟萃分析发现,与不应用MMC相比,未经调整的1年以上无症状的概率更大(73%对35%)。MMC的单次和多次应用在长期随访中导致相似的再狭窄率。使用常规剂量(0.4 mg/mL)与MMC使用相关的并发症很少报道。总体而言,证据质量较低,干预建议较弱。结论:MMC作为LTS辅助治疗的作用尚不明确。虽然MMC的应用是安全的,但其在减少狭窄复发方面的疗效仍然存在争议。需要进行大规模的前瞻性研究,为未来的建议提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Mitomycin-C in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: A Focused Clinical Review.

Background: Therapeutic options for managing laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) are limited. Endoscopy is a minimally invasive approach to treating LTS, but carries a high risk of stenosis recurrence. Mitomycin C (MMC) is often used as an adjunct therapy to delay the time to symptomatic recurrence of LTS. This review synthesizes the current literature on the topic of MMC as an adjunct treatment strategy for LTS.

Methods: A focused literature search was carried out from PubMed on June 12, 2022 using the terms "mitomycin c AND stenosis" in all fields with no date limitations. Evidence-based recommendations relevant to the clinical application of MMC as an adjunct therapy for LTS were formulated. Three questions were addressed: 1) efficacy of MMC, 2) single versus multiple application(s) of MMC, and 3) safety of MMC. The evidence rating and recommendation strength were guided by the GRADE system.

Results: Twenty-nine studies were reviewed. The efficacy of MMC as an adjunct therapy for LTS varied across studies. Randomized controlled trials have not shown an outcome difference with MMC use, although methodologic flaws including underpowering were noted. A meta-analysis of observational studies with a comparator arm found the unadjusted probability of remaining symptom-free for > 1 year is greater with versus without MMC application (73% vs. 35%). Single versus multiple application(s) of MMC resulted in similar restenosis rates at long-term follow-up. Complications related to MMC use are rarely reported using conventional doses (0.4 mg/mL). Overall, the quality of evidence was low and the recommendation for intervention was weak.

Conclusion: The role for MMC as an adjunct therapy in LTS is uncertain. While safe in its application, the efficacy of MMC in reducing stenosis recurrence remains a matter of debate. Large, prospective studies are needed to inform future recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信