维持胎溶术,胎膜早破和宫颈环扎术中的胎溶术-德国指南传播后对当前实践的德国范围调查。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Patrick Stelzl, Sven Kehl, Peter Oppelt, Andreas Mayr, Tobias Fleckenstein, Holger Maul, Sabine Enengl, Richard Berger, Werner Rath
{"title":"维持胎溶术,胎膜早破和宫颈环扎术中的胎溶术-德国指南传播后对当前实践的德国范围调查。","authors":"Patrick Stelzl,&nbsp;Sven Kehl,&nbsp;Peter Oppelt,&nbsp;Andreas Mayr,&nbsp;Tobias Fleckenstein,&nbsp;Holger Maul,&nbsp;Sabine Enengl,&nbsp;Richard Berger,&nbsp;Werner Rath","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2022-0572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the adherence of German perinatal specialist units and those of basic obstetric care to the national guideline we compared data from a nation-wide survey on the practice of maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in the perioperative setting of cervical cerclage, and bedrest during and after tocolysis with recommendations from the current German Guideline 015/025 \"Prevention and Treatment of Preterm Birth\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 632 obstetric clinics in Germany were approached and received a link to an online questionnaire. Data were descriptively analyzed by performing measures of frequency. To compare two or more groups Fisher's exact test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 19%; 23 (19.2%) of respondents did not perform maintenance tocolysis, while 97 (80.8%) conducted maintenance tocolysis; 30 (25.0%) of obstetric units performed cervical cerclage without tocolysis and 90 (75.0%) combined cervical cerclage with tocolysis; 11 (9.2%) of respondents did not use tocolytics in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes, while 109 (90.8%) conducted tocolysis in these patients; 69 (57.5%) of obstetric units did not recommend bed rest during tocolysis, whereas 51 (42.5%) favored bedrest. Perinatal care centers of basic obstetric care recommend bed arrest during tocolysis statistically significant more often to their patients than those of higher perinatal care levels (53.6 vs. 32.8%, p=0.0269).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of our survey are in accordance to others from different countries and reveal considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":"51 6","pages":"775-781"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in cervical cerclage - a Germany-wide survey on the current practice after dissemination of the German guideline.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Stelzl,&nbsp;Sven Kehl,&nbsp;Peter Oppelt,&nbsp;Andreas Mayr,&nbsp;Tobias Fleckenstein,&nbsp;Holger Maul,&nbsp;Sabine Enengl,&nbsp;Richard Berger,&nbsp;Werner Rath\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpm-2022-0572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the adherence of German perinatal specialist units and those of basic obstetric care to the national guideline we compared data from a nation-wide survey on the practice of maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in the perioperative setting of cervical cerclage, and bedrest during and after tocolysis with recommendations from the current German Guideline 015/025 \\\"Prevention and Treatment of Preterm Birth\\\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 632 obstetric clinics in Germany were approached and received a link to an online questionnaire. Data were descriptively analyzed by performing measures of frequency. To compare two or more groups Fisher's exact test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 19%; 23 (19.2%) of respondents did not perform maintenance tocolysis, while 97 (80.8%) conducted maintenance tocolysis; 30 (25.0%) of obstetric units performed cervical cerclage without tocolysis and 90 (75.0%) combined cervical cerclage with tocolysis; 11 (9.2%) of respondents did not use tocolytics in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes, while 109 (90.8%) conducted tocolysis in these patients; 69 (57.5%) of obstetric units did not recommend bed rest during tocolysis, whereas 51 (42.5%) favored bedrest. Perinatal care centers of basic obstetric care recommend bed arrest during tocolysis statistically significant more often to their patients than those of higher perinatal care levels (53.6 vs. 32.8%, p=0.0269).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of our survey are in accordance to others from different countries and reveal considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"775-781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0572\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:为了调查德国围产期专科单位和基础产科护理单位对国家指南的依从性,我们比较了一项全国范围内的调查数据,这些调查涉及维持性胎压、早产胎膜早破和宫颈环扎围手术期的胎压、以及胎压期间和之后的卧床,这些数据与德国现行指南015/025“预防和治疗早产”的建议。方法:与德国632家产科诊所进行了接触,并收到了在线问卷的链接。通过执行频率测量对数据进行描述性分析。为了比较两个或更多组,使用Fisher精确检验。结果:有效率为19%;23例(19.2%)未进行维持性产融,97例(80.8%)进行了维持性产融;30个产科单位(25.0%)进行宫颈环切术不溶胎术,90个产科单位(75.0%)进行宫颈环切术合并溶胎术;11例(9.2%)的应答者未对早产胎膜早破患者使用溶胎药,而109例(90.8%)的应答者在这些患者中使用了溶胎药;69个(57.5%)产科单位不建议产妇在妊娠期卧床休息,而51个(42.5%)产科单位赞成卧床休息。基础产科护理的围产期护理中心比围产期护理水平较高的围产期护理中心更常建议患者在围产期停床(53.6%比32.8%,p=0.0269)。结论:我们的调查结果与其他来自不同国家的调查结果一致,并揭示了循证指南建议与日常临床实践之间存在相当大的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in cervical cerclage - a Germany-wide survey on the current practice after dissemination of the German guideline.

Objectives: To investigate the adherence of German perinatal specialist units and those of basic obstetric care to the national guideline we compared data from a nation-wide survey on the practice of maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in the perioperative setting of cervical cerclage, and bedrest during and after tocolysis with recommendations from the current German Guideline 015/025 "Prevention and Treatment of Preterm Birth".

Methods: A total of 632 obstetric clinics in Germany were approached and received a link to an online questionnaire. Data were descriptively analyzed by performing measures of frequency. To compare two or more groups Fisher's exact test was used.

Results: The response rate was 19%; 23 (19.2%) of respondents did not perform maintenance tocolysis, while 97 (80.8%) conducted maintenance tocolysis; 30 (25.0%) of obstetric units performed cervical cerclage without tocolysis and 90 (75.0%) combined cervical cerclage with tocolysis; 11 (9.2%) of respondents did not use tocolytics in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes, while 109 (90.8%) conducted tocolysis in these patients; 69 (57.5%) of obstetric units did not recommend bed rest during tocolysis, whereas 51 (42.5%) favored bedrest. Perinatal care centers of basic obstetric care recommend bed arrest during tocolysis statistically significant more often to their patients than those of higher perinatal care levels (53.6 vs. 32.8%, p=0.0269).

Conclusions: The results of our survey are in accordance to others from different countries and reveal considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信