文化如何影响患者对医生以患者为中心的护理的偏好。

Q2 Social Sciences
Nicola Sheeran, Liz Jones, Rachyl Pines, Blair Jin, Aron Pamoso, Jessica Eigeland, Maria Benedetti
{"title":"文化如何影响患者对医生以患者为中心的护理的偏好。","authors":"Nicola Sheeran,&nbsp;Liz Jones,&nbsp;Rachyl Pines,&nbsp;Blair Jin,&nbsp;Aron Pamoso,&nbsp;Jessica Eigeland,&nbsp;Maria Benedetti","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2022.2095098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-centered care (PCC) is the prevailing model of care globally. However, most research on PCC has been conducted in Westernized countries or has focused on only two facets of PCC: decision-making and information exchange. Our study examined how culture influences patients' preferences for five facets of PCC, including communication, decision-making, empathy, individualized focus, and relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 2071) from Hong Kong, the Philippines, Australia, and the U.S.A. completed an online survey assessing their preferences for exchange of information, autonomy in decision-making, expression and validation of their emotions, focus on them as an individual, and the doctor-patient relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants from all four countries had similar preferences for empathy and shared decision-making. For other facets of PCC, participants in the Philippines and Australia expressed somewhat similar preferences, as did those in the U.S.A. and Hong Kong, challenging East-West stereotypes. Participants in the Philippines placed greater value on relationships, whereas Australians valued more autonomy. Participants in Hong Kong more commonly preferred doctor-directed care, with less importance placed on the relationship. Responses from U.S.A. participants were surprising, as they ranked the need for individualized care and two-way flow of information as least important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Empathy, information exchange, and shared decision-making are values shared across countries, while preferences for how the information is shared, and the importance of the doctor-patient relationship differ.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":"16 2","pages":"186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How culture influences patient preferences for patient-centered care with their doctors.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Sheeran,&nbsp;Liz Jones,&nbsp;Rachyl Pines,&nbsp;Blair Jin,&nbsp;Aron Pamoso,&nbsp;Jessica Eigeland,&nbsp;Maria Benedetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538068.2022.2095098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-centered care (PCC) is the prevailing model of care globally. However, most research on PCC has been conducted in Westernized countries or has focused on only two facets of PCC: decision-making and information exchange. Our study examined how culture influences patients' preferences for five facets of PCC, including communication, decision-making, empathy, individualized focus, and relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 2071) from Hong Kong, the Philippines, Australia, and the U.S.A. completed an online survey assessing their preferences for exchange of information, autonomy in decision-making, expression and validation of their emotions, focus on them as an individual, and the doctor-patient relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants from all four countries had similar preferences for empathy and shared decision-making. For other facets of PCC, participants in the Philippines and Australia expressed somewhat similar preferences, as did those in the U.S.A. and Hong Kong, challenging East-West stereotypes. Participants in the Philippines placed greater value on relationships, whereas Australians valued more autonomy. Participants in Hong Kong more commonly preferred doctor-directed care, with less importance placed on the relationship. Responses from U.S.A. participants were surprising, as they ranked the need for individualized care and two-way flow of information as least important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Empathy, information exchange, and shared decision-making are values shared across countries, while preferences for how the information is shared, and the importance of the doctor-patient relationship differ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"186-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2022.2095098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2022.2095098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:以患者为中心的护理(PCC)是全球流行的护理模式。然而,大多数关于合作伙伴关系的研究都是在西方化的国家进行的,或者只关注合作伙伴关系的两个方面:决策和信息交流。我们的研究考察了文化如何影响患者对PCC五个方面的偏好,包括沟通、决策、移情、个性化关注和关系。方法:来自香港、菲律宾、澳大利亚和美国的参与者(N = 2071)完成了一项在线调查,评估他们在信息交流、决策自主、情绪表达和确认、个人关注和医患关系方面的偏好。结果:来自四个国家的参与者在移情和共同决策方面有相似的偏好。对于PCC的其他方面,菲律宾和澳大利亚的参与者表达了类似的偏好,美国和香港的参与者也表达了类似的偏好,挑战了东西方的刻板印象。菲律宾的受访者更看重人际关系,而澳大利亚人则更看重自主权。香港的参与者通常更喜欢医生指导的护理,而不太重视这种关系。美国参与者的反应令人惊讶,因为他们将个性化护理和双向信息流动的需求排在最不重要的位置。结论:同理心、信息交流和共同决策是各国共有的价值观,而对信息共享方式的偏好和医患关系的重要性则有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How culture influences patient preferences for patient-centered care with their doctors.

Background: Patient-centered care (PCC) is the prevailing model of care globally. However, most research on PCC has been conducted in Westernized countries or has focused on only two facets of PCC: decision-making and information exchange. Our study examined how culture influences patients' preferences for five facets of PCC, including communication, decision-making, empathy, individualized focus, and relationship.

Methods: Participants (N = 2071) from Hong Kong, the Philippines, Australia, and the U.S.A. completed an online survey assessing their preferences for exchange of information, autonomy in decision-making, expression and validation of their emotions, focus on them as an individual, and the doctor-patient relationship.

Results: Participants from all four countries had similar preferences for empathy and shared decision-making. For other facets of PCC, participants in the Philippines and Australia expressed somewhat similar preferences, as did those in the U.S.A. and Hong Kong, challenging East-West stereotypes. Participants in the Philippines placed greater value on relationships, whereas Australians valued more autonomy. Participants in Hong Kong more commonly preferred doctor-directed care, with less importance placed on the relationship. Responses from U.S.A. participants were surprising, as they ranked the need for individualized care and two-way flow of information as least important.

Conclusions: Empathy, information exchange, and shared decision-making are values shared across countries, while preferences for how the information is shared, and the importance of the doctor-patient relationship differ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信