权力下放、卫生和可持续发展目标3。

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
R Anju, R Sadanandan, K Vijayakumar, V Raman Kutty, B Soman, R M Ravindran, R P Varma
{"title":"权力下放、卫生和可持续发展目标3。","authors":"R Anju,&nbsp;R Sadanandan,&nbsp;K Vijayakumar,&nbsp;V Raman Kutty,&nbsp;B Soman,&nbsp;R M Ravindran,&nbsp;R P Varma","doi":"10.5588/pha.22.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kerala State, India, implemented decentralising reforms of healthcare institutions 25 years ago through transfer of administrative control and a sizeable share of the financial allocation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the main impacts of decentralisation in Kerala on local policy formulation, programme implementation and service delivery for sustainable health systems.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was part of a broader qualitative study on decentralisation and health in Kerala. We conducted 25 in-depth interviews and reviewed 31 government orders or policy documents, five related transcripts and five thematic reports from the main study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liaising between health system and local governments has improved over time. A shift from welfare-centric projects to infrastructure, human resources and services was evident. Considerable heterogeneity existed due to varying degrees of involvement, capacity, resources and needs of the community. State-level discourse and recent augmentation efforts for moving towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) strongly uphold the role of local governments in planning, financing and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 25-year history of decentralised healthcare administration in Kerala indicates both successes and failures. Central support without disempowering the local governments can be a viable option to allow flexible decision-making consistent with broader system goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46239,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Action","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983807/pdf/i2220-8372-13-s1-51.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decentralisation, health and Sustainable Development Goal 3.\",\"authors\":\"R Anju,&nbsp;R Sadanandan,&nbsp;K Vijayakumar,&nbsp;V Raman Kutty,&nbsp;B Soman,&nbsp;R M Ravindran,&nbsp;R P Varma\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/pha.22.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kerala State, India, implemented decentralising reforms of healthcare institutions 25 years ago through transfer of administrative control and a sizeable share of the financial allocation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the main impacts of decentralisation in Kerala on local policy formulation, programme implementation and service delivery for sustainable health systems.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was part of a broader qualitative study on decentralisation and health in Kerala. We conducted 25 in-depth interviews and reviewed 31 government orders or policy documents, five related transcripts and five thematic reports from the main study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liaising between health system and local governments has improved over time. A shift from welfare-centric projects to infrastructure, human resources and services was evident. Considerable heterogeneity existed due to varying degrees of involvement, capacity, resources and needs of the community. State-level discourse and recent augmentation efforts for moving towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) strongly uphold the role of local governments in planning, financing and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 25-year history of decentralised healthcare administration in Kerala indicates both successes and failures. Central support without disempowering the local governments can be a viable option to allow flexible decision-making consistent with broader system goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Action\",\"volume\":\"13 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983807/pdf/i2220-8372-13-s1-51.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.22.0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.22.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:25年前,印度喀拉拉邦通过转移行政控制和分配相当大份额的财政拨款,对医疗机构实施了下放改革。目的:描述喀拉拉邦权力下放对地方政策制定、项目实施和可持续卫生系统服务提供的主要影响。设计:这是关于喀拉拉邦权力下放与健康的更广泛定性研究的一部分。我们进行了25次深度访谈,审查了31份政府命令或政策文件、5份相关成绩单和5份主要研究的专题报告。结果:随着时间的推移,卫生系统与地方政府之间的联系有所改善。从以福利为中心的项目向基础设施、人力资源和服务的转变是显而易见的。由于社区的参与程度、能力、资源和需要各不相同,因此存在相当大的异质性。为实现联合国可持续发展目标(sdg),国家层面的讨论和最近的加强努力强烈支持地方政府在规划、融资和实施方面的作用。结论:喀拉拉邦25年的分散医疗管理历史表明既有成功也有失败。在不剥夺地方政府权力的情况下,中央支持是一个可行的选择,可以使决策灵活,与更广泛的系统目标相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decentralisation, health and Sustainable Development Goal 3.

Setting: Kerala State, India, implemented decentralising reforms of healthcare institutions 25 years ago through transfer of administrative control and a sizeable share of the financial allocation.

Objective: To describe the main impacts of decentralisation in Kerala on local policy formulation, programme implementation and service delivery for sustainable health systems.

Design: This was part of a broader qualitative study on decentralisation and health in Kerala. We conducted 25 in-depth interviews and reviewed 31 government orders or policy documents, five related transcripts and five thematic reports from the main study.

Results: Liaising between health system and local governments has improved over time. A shift from welfare-centric projects to infrastructure, human resources and services was evident. Considerable heterogeneity existed due to varying degrees of involvement, capacity, resources and needs of the community. State-level discourse and recent augmentation efforts for moving towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) strongly uphold the role of local governments in planning, financing and implementation.

Conclusion: The 25-year history of decentralised healthcare administration in Kerala indicates both successes and failures. Central support without disempowering the local governments can be a viable option to allow flexible decision-making consistent with broader system goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Action
Public Health Action RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Launched on 1 May 2011, Public Health Action (PHA) is an official publication of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). It is an open access, online journal available world-wide to physicians, health workers, researchers, professors, students and decision-makers, including public health centres, medical, university and pharmaceutical libraries, hospitals, clinics, foundations and institutions. PHA is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that actively encourages, communicates and reports new knowledge, dialogue and controversy in health systems and services for people in vulnerable and resource-limited communities — all topics that reflect the mission of The Union, Health solutions for the poor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信